On 2009-03-02, 11:17 GMT, Brian Chadwick wrote:
> This is happening after the last round of F10 updates involving
> postfix.
>
> postfix-2.5.6-1.fc10.i386.rpm
Known problem
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221347) and
apparently not simple to tackle. Moreover, upstream doesn't seem
to consider SELinux as something to consider. Oh well.
Matěj
--
fedora-selinux-list mailing list
fedora-selinux-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
03-02-2009, 04:09 PM
Daniel J Walsh
postfix trying to access /boot AVC
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 2009-03-02, 11:17 GMT, Brian Chadwick wrote:
>> This is happening after the last round of F10 updates involving
>> postfix.
>>
>> postfix-2.5.6-1.fc10.i386.rpm
>
> Known problem
> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=221347) and
> apparently not simple to tackle. Moreover, upstream doesn't seem
> to consider SELinux as something to consider. Oh well.
>
> Matěj
>
> --
> fedora-selinux-list mailing list
> fedora-selinux-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-selinux-list
I think we should fix this in policy and allow postfix domains to search
mountpoints.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org