FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Packaging

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 09-15-2012, 09:43 PM
Michael Schwendt
 
Default glibc-devel (or libstdc++-devel) not BuildRequires exceptions?

On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 16:20:54 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:

> Was about to comment on a review that
> BuildRequires: glibc-devel
> isn't needed and was in the list of exceptions, and was to link the list
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2
> only to discover it indeed is not there.
>
> Shouldn't it be?
>
> A Similar argument could probably be made for libstdc++-devel

It hasn't come up often enough over the past years. The guidelines say:

| There is no need to include the following packages
| or their dependencies ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
(!)

* gcc and gcc-c++ are on the list
* gcc requires glibc-devel
* gcc-c++ requires libstdc++-devel

--
Fedora release 17 (Beefy Miracle) - Linux 3.5.3-1.fc17.x86_64
loadavg: 0.20 0.29 0.29
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 01:09 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org