FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Packaging

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 09-15-2012, 09:20 PM
Rex Dieter
 
Default glibc-devel (or libstdc++-devel) not BuildRequires exceptions?

Was about to comment on a review that
BuildRequires: glibc-devel
isn't needed and was in the list of exceptions, and was to link the list
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2
only to discover it indeed is not there.

Shouldn't it be?

A Similar argument could probably be made for libstdc++-devel

-- rex

--
packaging mailing list
packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
 
Old 09-15-2012, 10:03 PM
Rex Dieter
 
Default glibc-devel (or libstdc++-devel) not BuildRequires exceptions?

Michael Schwendt wrote:

> On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 16:20:54 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>
>> Was about to comment on a review that
>> BuildRequires: glibc-devel
>> isn't needed and was in the list of exceptions, and was to link the list
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2
>> only to discover it indeed is not there.
>>
>> Shouldn't it be?
>>
>> A Similar argument could probably be made for libstdc++-devel
>
> It hasn't come up often enough over the past years. The guidelines say:
>
> | There is no need to include the following packages
> | or their dependencies ...
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Oh thanks!

-- rex

--
packaging mailing list
packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 02:33 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org