glibc-devel (or libstdc++-devel) not BuildRequires exceptions?
Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 16:20:54 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Was about to comment on a review that
>> BuildRequires: glibc-devel
>> isn't needed and was in the list of exceptions, and was to link the list
>> only to discover it indeed is not there.
>> Shouldn't it be?
>> A Similar argument could probably be made for libstdc++-devel
> It hasn't come up often enough over the past years. The guidelines say:
> | There is no need to include the following packages
> | or their dependencies ...
packaging mailing list