Get paid to package! (Etherpad Lite)
Hey all!
I didn't post this bounty, but it came across our system and it seems like you guys might be able to earn a quick bit of money on this one: http://gun.io/contracts/16/rpm-based-install-for-etherpad-lite-on-rhel-128 Any takers? -- Rich Jones Director, Gun.io -- packaging mailing list packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging |
Get paid to package! (Etherpad Lite)
On 12/20/2011 07:10 PM, Rich Jones wrote:
Hey all! I didn't post this bounty, but it came across our system and it seems like you guys might be able to earn a quick bit of money on this one: http://gun.io/contracts/16/rpm-based-install-for-etherpad-lite-on-rhel-128 Any takers? -- Rich Jones Director, Gun.io <http://Gun.io> Moving this to epel-devel, which may be more appropriate. I took a look at last night and this is what I discovered: - Current etherpad 1.1 seems to require scala 2.7 and does not like 2.8, which is currently packaged for Fedora (not epel). Apparently patches exist to make etherpad compatible with 2.8 at the expense of 2.7 compatibility, but have not yet been merged in. - scala as currently packaged requires jline and shtools. shtools is easy, jline less so. But scala bundles jline and could probably be used for the purposes of this bounty. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- packaging mailing list packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging |
Get paid to package! (Etherpad Lite)
On 12/20/2011 07:10 PM, Rich Jones wrote:
Hey all! I didn't post this bounty, but it came across our system and it seems like you guys might be able to earn a quick bit of money on this one: http://gun.io/contracts/16/rpm-based-install-for-etherpad-lite-on-rhel-128 Any takers? -- Rich Jones Director, Gun.io <http://Gun.io> Moving this to epel-devel, which may be more appropriate. I took a look at last night and this is what I discovered: - Current etherpad 1.1 seems to require scala 2.7 and does not like 2.8, which is currently packaged for Fedora (not epel). Apparently patches exist to make etherpad compatible with 2.8 at the expense of 2.7 compatibility, but have not yet been merged in. - scala as currently packaged requires jline and shtools. shtools is easy, jline less so. But scala bundles jline and could probably be used for the purposes of this bounty. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list epel-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list |
Get paid to package! (Etherpad Lite)
On ons, 2011-12-21 at 19:44 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> - scala as currently packaged requires jline and shtools. shtools is > easy, jline less so. But scala bundles jline and could probably be used > for the purposes of this bounty. For the purpose of this bounty: Maybe so. For inclusion in Fedora/Epel: Probably not, see http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Bundling_of_multiple_projects and http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Duplication_of_system_librari es -- David Juran Sr. Consultant Red Hat +46-725-345801 _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list epel-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list |
Get paid to package! (Etherpad Lite)
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 4:44 AM, Orion Poplawski <orion@cora.nwra.com> wrote:
On 12/20/2011 07:10 PM, Rich Jones wrote: Hey all! I didn't post this bounty, but it came across our system and it seems like you guys might be able to earn a quick bit of money on this one: http://gun.io/contracts/16/rpm-based-install-for-etherpad-lite-on-rhel-128 Any takers? -- Rich Jones Director, Gun.io <http://Gun.io> Moving this to epel-devel, which may be more appropriate. I took a look at last night and this is what I discovered: - Current etherpad 1.1 seems to require scala 2.7 and does not like 2.8, which is currently packaged for Fedora (not epel). *Apparently patches exist to make etherpad compatible with 2.8 at the expense of 2.7 compatibility, but have not yet been merged in. - scala as currently packaged requires jline and shtools. *shtools is easy, jline less so. *But scala bundles jline and could probably be used for the purposes of this bounty. I think Rich is talking about Etherpad-lite which doesn't need scala, but node.js. -- Nikos Roussos about | linkedin -- packaging mailing list packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging |
Get paid to package! (Etherpad Lite)
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 4:44 AM, Orion Poplawski <orion@cora.nwra.com> wrote:
On 12/20/2011 07:10 PM, Rich Jones wrote: Hey all! I didn't post this bounty, but it came across our system and it seems like you guys might be able to earn a quick bit of money on this one: http://gun.io/contracts/16/rpm-based-install-for-etherpad-lite-on-rhel-128 Any takers? -- Rich Jones Director, Gun.io <http://Gun.io> Moving this to epel-devel, which may be more appropriate. I took a look at last night and this is what I discovered: - Current etherpad 1.1 seems to require scala 2.7 and does not like 2.8, which is currently packaged for Fedora (not epel). *Apparently patches exist to make etherpad compatible with 2.8 at the expense of 2.7 compatibility, but have not yet been merged in. - scala as currently packaged requires jline and shtools. *shtools is easy, jline less so. *But scala bundles jline and could probably be used for the purposes of this bounty. I think Rich is talking about Etherpad-lite which doesn't need scala, but node.js. -- Nikos Roussos about | linkedin _______________________________________________ epel-devel-list mailing list epel-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/epel-devel-list |
Get paid to package! (Etherpad Lite)
On Thu, 22 Dec 2011 11:20:57 +0000, JBG (Jóhann) wrote:
> For example could etherpad-lite be shipped with the distribution when it > depends on 3 party repo No. -- packaging mailing list packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 10:12 PM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.