Now, there are currently no packages in Fedora that provide
/usr/lib/ada/adalib and /usr/share/ada/adainclude. gcc-gnat does
provide /usr/lib/gcc/i386-redhat-linux/4.1.2/adainclude, but this is
clearly for internal use.
So, what package should provide these two directories? filesystem?
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion@cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
02-12-2008, 01:49 PM
"Tom "spot" Callaway"
Ada packages
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 13:45 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> The latest release of plplot includes Ada bindings. The Ada development
> files are installed in:
>
> /usr/lib/ada/adalib/plplotadad/ (*.ali)
>
> and
>
> /usr/share/ada/adainclude/plplotadad/ (*.ads and *.adb)
>
> The PLplot project are following the recommendations made here:
>
> http://www.ada-france.org/debian/debian-ada-policy.html
Keep in mind that a lot of the debian packaging policies aren't terribly
useful to us because Debian has no concept of multilib. So, where debian
just dumps anything arch specific in /usr/lib, we want to use
%{_libdir}.
~spot
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
02-12-2008, 03:46 PM
Orion Poplawski
Ada packages
Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 13:45 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
The latest release of plplot includes Ada bindings. The Ada development
files are installed in:
/usr/lib/ada/adalib/plplotadad/ (*.ali)
and
/usr/share/ada/adainclude/plplotadad/ (*.ads and *.adb)
The PLplot project are following the recommendations made here:
Keep in mind that a lot of the debian packaging policies aren't terribly
useful to us because Debian has no concept of multilib. So, where debian
just dumps anything arch specific in /usr/lib, we want to use
%{_libdir}.
Sorry, that should have read %{_libdir}. The plplot package already
does that.
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion@cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
02-12-2008, 04:36 PM
"Tom "spot" Callaway"
Ada packages
On Mon, 2008-02-11 at 13:45 -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> So, what package should provide these two directories? filesystem?
Is there anything that all ada packages will depend on for runtime
functionality? If not, then filesystem seems like the only other way.
~spot
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
02-12-2008, 04:39 PM
Bill Nottingham
Ada packages
Tom spot Callaway (tcallawa@redhat.com) said:
> > So, what package should provide these two directories? filesystem?
>
> Is there anything that all ada packages will depend on for runtime
> functionality?
libgnat, presumably.
Bill
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
02-12-2008, 07:38 PM
Orion Poplawski
Ada packages
Bill Nottingham wrote:
Tom spot Callaway (tcallawa@redhat.com) said:
So, what package should provide these two directories? filesystem?
Is there anything that all ada packages will depend on for runtime
functionality?
libgnat, presumably.
Well, these directories are only required for Ada development, not
runtime. For Ada development you're going to need gcc-gnat (and libgnat).
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion@cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
Ada packages
