Bill Nottingham <notting@redhat.com> writes:

> As a followup to FESCo ticket 346 (https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/346),
> FESCo would like the Fedora Packaging Committee to draft a guideline against
> dependencies on redhat-lsb

Why not remove redhab-lsb completely from Fedora? It seems to be
unmaintained and critical bugs stay forever. Keeping it in current
state would give people who search for an LSB compliant distribution a
wrong impression.


Enrico
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging

Till Maas <opensource@till.name> writes:

> I understand the comment from Kevin at "03/16/10 21:11:09" that it
> would also be ok to require potential subpackages once redhat-lsb has
> been made more granular.

package has been split in F-13:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=151092

'lsb-core-noarch' does not have x11 or cups dependencies anymore.


Enrico
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging