Help needed handling package move
I package the eclipse-photran feature. Currently this is at version
5.0.0. The Photran project has merged with the PTP project which I currently am in the process of packaging. I'm still splitting out the photran compenents with the package names "eclipse-photran*" , but because PTP is at version 3.0.1, their versions are now lower. The photran component is still considered to be at 5.0.0 (or 5.0.1). Any suggestions on how to handle this would be appreciated. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- packaging mailing list packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging |
Help needed handling package move
On 01/21/2010 12:23 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I package the eclipse-photran feature. Currently this is at version > 5.0.0. The Photran project has merged with the PTP project which I > currently am in the process of packaging. > > I'm still splitting out the photran compenents with the package names > "eclipse-photran*" , but because PTP is at version 3.0.1, their versions > are now lower. The photran component is still considered to be at 5.0.0 > (or 5.0.1). add an Epoch ? -- Rex -- packaging mailing list packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging |
Help needed handling package move
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:23 PM, Orion Poplawski <orion@cora.nwra.com> wrote:
> I package the eclipse-photran feature. *Currently this is at version > 5.0.0. *The Photran project has merged with the PTP project which I > currently am in the process of packaging. > > I'm still splitting out the photran compenents with the package names > "eclipse-photran*" , but because PTP is at version 3.0.1, their versions > are now lower. *The photran component is still considered to be at 5.0.0 > (or 5.0.1). > > Any suggestions on how to handle this would be appreciated. Specify a version for the Photran subpackage? -- Garrett Holmstrom -- packaging mailing list packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging |
Help needed handling package move
On 01/21/2010 11:38 AM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
> > Specify a version for the Photran subpackage? > Can that be done? -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- packaging mailing list packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging |
Help needed handling package move
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:41 PM, Orion Poplawski <orion@cora.nwra.com> wrote:
> On 01/21/2010 11:38 AM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: >> >> Specify a version for the Photran subpackage? >> > > Can that be done? It certainly can in F12, at least. -- Garrett Holmstrom -- packaging mailing list packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging |
Help needed handling package move
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 11:41:33 -0700
Orion Poplawski <orion@cora.nwra.com> wrote: > On 01/21/2010 11:38 AM, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: > > > > Specify a version for the Photran subpackage? > > > > Can that be done? Certainly. See the perl package for a multitude of examples where the subpackages for individual perl modules have their own version numbers. Paul. -- packaging mailing list packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 02:25 PM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.