On Sat, 31 Jan 2009 17:01:54 -0500
Susan Lauber <laubersm@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> Greetings to the authors/maintainers of Package Maintainer wiki pages,
>
> I introduced myself last week [1] and since then I have dug into the
> pages and set up a task table [2]
Greetings!
> I have already added a category to most pages so they can all be found
> together [3].
> If there are others or if you create a new page just add the string
> [[Category:Package Maintainers]] to the bottom of the page.
>
> The next step is renaming so that pages are easier to find in a
> search. It will also make the category page easier to use. I have
> started making suggested in the packagemaintainers.psv [4] file in
> the wikirename.git repo and
>
> ***I encourage others to check the proposed names and offer additional
> suggestions.***
ok. Here's my suggestions:
--- a/packagemaintainers.psv
+++ b/packagemaintainers.psv
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@ PackageMaintainers/CvsAccess|CVS access for package maintainers
#PackageMaintainers/FC6Status|Archive:PackageMaintainers/FC6Status
PackageMaintainers/FEver|Using FEver to track upstream changes
PackageMaintainers/HelpWanted|Help wanted for package maintainance
-PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored|How to get a package sponsored
+PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored|How to get a sponsored into the packager group
PackageMaintainers/InProgressReviewRequests|
PackageMaintainers/Join|Join the package collection maintainers
#following Main* are included in other pages
@@ -30,13 +30,15 @@ PackageMaintainers/MainPagePackaging|
PackageMaintainers/MainPageUsers|
PackageMaintainers/MaintainerResponsibility|Package maintainer responsibilities
#following needs love - I can't tell a good name from content.
-PackageMaintainers/Makefile|Handling the Makefile
+#This is out of date and 'make help' should be used instead anyhow - kevin
+PackageMaintainers/Makefile|Archive:PackageMaintainers/Makefile
PackageMaintainers/MockTricks|Using Mock to test package builds
PackageMaintainers/NewPackageProcess|New package process for existing contributors
PackageMaintainers/OrphanedPackages|Orphaned package that need new maintainers
PackageMaintainers/PackageEndOfLife|How to remove a package at end of life
PackageMaintainers/PackageStatus|Package status
#archive the following CompsF*Missing ?
+#yes, I would think so - kevin
PackageMaintainers/PackageStatus/CompsF10Missing|
PackageMaintainers/PackageStatus/CompsF7Missing|
PackageMaintainers/PackageStatus/CompsF8Missing|
@@ -47,7 +49,8 @@ PackageMaintainers/Policy|Package maintainer policy
PackageMaintainers/Policy/EOL|Policy for package lifecycle
PackageMaintainers/Policy/EncourageComaintainership|Policy for encouraging comaintainers
PackageMaintainers/Policy/FESCoElections|FESCo election policy
-PackageMaintainers/Policy/KernelModules|Packaging kernel modules
+# should be removed, no longer applicable
+PackageMaintainers/Policy/KernelModules|
PackageMaintainers/Policy/NonResponsiveMaintainers|Policy for nonresponsive package maint
PackageMaintainers/Policy/StalledReviews|Policy for stalled package reviews
> I would like to have this file ready for the wikibot by the end of
> the week (Feb 7).
> Lack of response will be seen as a vote of confidence
Excellent. Thanks for looking at this!
> Thanks,
> Susan
kevin
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
PackageMaintainers wiki cleanup update
