On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 12:21 +0200, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> I'm packaging the open64 compiler, see
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 .
>
> The problem I'm facing is that the prebuilt compiler
> needs /lib/ld-linux.so.2 to operate.

Wait, it needs a specific version of the loader? How does that work?

--
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet@gmail.com>

PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 05:33 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 12:21 +0200, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> > I'm packaging the open64 compiler, see
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 .
> >
> > The problem I'm facing is that the prebuilt compiler
> > needs /lib/ld-linux.so.2 to operate.
>
> Wait, it needs a specific version of the loader? How does that work?

Umm, I'm not sure about that; I added the dependency only
because /lib/ld-linux.so.2 exists on all platforms I've tested so far
(EPEL 4 - Fedora rawhide).

/lib/ld-linux.so.2 is a symlink anyways, in Fedora 9 it points to
ld-2.8.so and in EPEL 4 to ld-2.3.4.so...
--
Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@iki.fi>

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 13:12 +0200, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 05:33 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 12:21 +0200, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> > > I'm packaging the open64 compiler, see
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 .
> > >
> > > The problem I'm facing is that the prebuilt compiler
> > > needs /lib/ld-linux.so.2 to operate.
> >
> > Wait, it needs a specific version of the loader? How does that work?
>
> Umm, I'm not sure about that; I added the dependency only
> because /lib/ld-linux.so.2 exists on all platforms I've tested so far
> (EPEL 4 - Fedora rawhide).

Does it build properly on all platforms if you remove the dependency?

--
Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams <ivazqueznet@gmail.com>

PLEASE don't CC me; I'm already subscribed
--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging

On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 06:31 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 13:12 +0200, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 05:33 -0500, Ignacio Vazquez-Abrams wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2008-11-13 at 12:21 +0200, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> > > > I'm packaging the open64 compiler, see
> > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470830 .
> > > >
> > > > The problem I'm facing is that the prebuilt compiler
> > > > needs /lib/ld-linux.so.2 to operate.
> > >
> > > Wait, it needs a specific version of the loader? How does that work?
> >
> > Umm, I'm not sure about that; I added the dependency only
> > because /lib/ld-linux.so.2 exists on all platforms I've tested so far
> > (EPEL 4 - Fedora rawhide).
>
> Does it build properly on all platforms if you remove the dependency?

No, it fails on x86_64 with the following error:


opencc -march=anyx86 -m64 -D_SGI_SOURCE -D_LANGUAGE_C -Wformat
-funsigned-char -D__GNU_BUG_WORKAROUND -c -DVENDOR_OSP
-DHAVE_CONFIG_H -DLONGLONG -I../../libelf/lib -I../../libelf -m64
-DTARG_X8664 -D__STDC_LIMIT_MACROS -DKEY -DOSP_OPT -DPATHSCALE_MERGE
-DPSC_TO_OPEN64 -DSHARED_BUILD -std=gnu99 -D_GNU_SOURCE -fpic
-I../include -O3 -fno-fast-stdlib -D_MIPSEL -D_LONGLONG
-D_MIPS_SZINT=32 -D_MIPS_SZPTR=64 -D_MIPS_SZLONG=64 -D_LP64 -MMD -O2 -g
-Wall -fexceptions -m64 ../../libelf/lib/32.fsize.c -o 32.fsize.o
sh: /builddir/build/BUILD/open64-4.2-0/opt/open64/bin/opencc: /lib/ld-linux.so.2: bad ELF interpreter: No such file or directory

--
Jussi Lehtola <jussi.lehtola@iki.fi>

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging