fortran .mod files
Patrice Dumas wrote:
On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 10:07:18AM -0400, Ed Hill wrote: So are we reaching a consensus here on "%{_libdir}/gfortran/modules"? Does anyone have any technical objections to it? I have put a proposal here: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/FortranModulesDir for consideration by the packaging commitee. Did this ever get ratified? I'm starting to look at my .mod multiarch bugs... -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion@cora.nwra.com Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging |
fortran .mod files
On Wed, Dec 05, 2007 at 03:22:01PM -0700, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Patrice Dumas wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 10:07:18AM -0400, Ed Hill wrote: >>> So are we reaching a consensus here on "%{_libdir}/gfortran/modules"? >>> Does anyone have any technical objections to it? >> >> I have put a proposal here: >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/FortranModulesDir >> >> for consideration by the packaging commitee. >> > > Did this ever get ratified? I'm starting to look at my .mod multiarch > bugs... It is ratified, I am waiting for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=373861 to go and fix packages. -- Pat -- Fedora-packaging mailing list Fedora-packaging@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 02:18 PM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.