FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

» Linux Archive
Home
New Posts
Search
FAQ


Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Packaging

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 06-26-2008, 11:40 PM
Matthew Jurgens
 
Default Packaging of Nagios

I am waiting for the release of the fedora Nagios package and was
wondering if I could get involved to help speed up the process?



--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
 
Old 06-26-2008, 11:46 PM
Matthew Jurgens
 
Default Packaging of Nagios

I am referring to Nagios v3

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
 
Old 06-26-2008, 11:51 PM
Rex Dieter
 
Default Packaging of Nagios

Matthew Jurgens wrote:
I am waiting for the release of the fedora Nagios package and was
wondering if I could get involved to help speed up the process?


This list is for discussing fedora packaging policy and guidelines.

Contacting the maintainer, filing a bug, or asking on fedora-devel list
would get you closer to what you're after.


-- Rex

--
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
 
Old 06-27-2008, 12:01 AM
Matthew Jurgens
 
Default Packaging of Nagios

I am waiting for the release of the fedora Nagios v3 package and was

wondering if I could get involved to help speed up the process?






--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 06-27-2008, 04:22 PM
Roy-Magne Mo
 
Default Packaging of Nagios

Matthew Jurgens skreiv:

I am waiting for the release of the fedora Nagios v3 package and was

wondering if I could get involved to help speed up the process?


I've packaged Nagios 3 for my self and contacted Shawn Starr and asked
if he was interested in the updates to the existing package. He replied
that it wasn't interesting before the nagios 2 line was killed off.


So, it seems like fedora has been debianized

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 06-27-2008, 04:32 PM
Dan Horák
 
Default Packaging of Nagios

Roy-Magne Mo pÃ*Å¡e v Pá 27. 06. 2008 v 18:22 +0200:
> Matthew Jurgens skreiv:
> > I am waiting for the release of the fedora Nagios v3 package and was
> >
> > wondering if I could get involved to help speed up the process?
>
> I've packaged Nagios 3 for my self and contacted Shawn Starr and asked
> if he was interested in the updates to the existing package. He replied
> that it wasn't interesting before the nagios 2 line was killed off.
>
> So, it seems like fedora has been debianized
>

But you can submit a package called nagios3 and when there will be no
conflicts with nagios then Fedora will have both.


Dan

--
Fedora and Red Hat package maintainer

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 06-27-2008, 04:33 PM
"Shawn Starr"
 
Default Packaging of Nagios

> -----Original Message-----
> From: fedora-devel-list-bounces@redhat.com
> [mailto:fedora-devel-list-bounces@redhat.com]On Behalf Of Roy-Magne Mo
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 12:23 PM
> To: Development discussions related to Fedora
> Subject: Re: Packaging of Nagios
>
>
> Matthew Jurgens skreiv:
> > I am waiting for the release of the fedora Nagios v3 package and was
> >
> > wondering if I could get involved to help speed up the process?
>
> I've packaged Nagios 3 for my self and contacted Shawn Starr
> and asked
> if he was interested in the updates to the existing package.
> He replied
> that it wasn't interesting before the nagios 2 line was killed off.
>
> So, it seems like fedora has been debianized
>

It's not that. If we want to drop Nagios 2.x how will people upgrade properly? We could make a nagios3 package but my worry is what depends on Nagios (I haven't seen the list yet).

Shawn.


> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 06-27-2008, 04:35 PM
Mike McGrath
 
Default Packaging of Nagios

On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Dan Horák wrote:

>
> Roy-Magne Mo pÃ*Å¡e v Pá 27. 06. 2008 v 18:22 +0200:
> > Matthew Jurgens skreiv:
> > > I am waiting for the release of the fedora Nagios v3 package and was
> > >
> > > wondering if I could get involved to help speed up the process?
> >
> > I've packaged Nagios 3 for my self and contacted Shawn Starr and asked
> > if he was interested in the updates to the existing package. He replied
> > that it wasn't interesting before the nagios 2 line was killed off.
> >
> > So, it seems like fedora has been debianized
> >
>
> But you can submit a package called nagios3 and when there will be no
> conflicts with nagios then Fedora will have both.
>
>

It amuses me that, for whatever reason, none of you have bothered to
contact me about it and instead went to a list that already gets way to
much traffic. My email address is: mmcgrath@fedoraproject.org

If you're interested in getting nagios 3 ready and into Fedora, I could
certainly use help with that.

-Mike--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 06-27-2008, 04:47 PM
Roy-Magne Mo
 
Default Packaging of Nagios

Mike McGrath skreiv:

On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Dan Horák wrote:


Roy-Magne Mo pÃ*Å¡e v Pá 27. 06. 2008 v 18:22 +0200:

Matthew Jurgens skreiv:

I am waiting for the release of the fedora Nagios v3 package and was

wondering if I could get involved to help speed up the process?

I've packaged Nagios 3 for my self and contacted Shawn Starr and asked
if he was interested in the updates to the existing package. He replied
that it wasn't interesting before the nagios 2 line was killed off.

So, it seems like fedora has been debianized


But you can submit a package called nagios3 and when there will be no
conflicts with nagios then Fedora will have both.




It amuses me that, for whatever reason, none of you have bothered to
contact me about it and instead went to a list that already gets way to
much traffic. My email address is: mmcgrath@fedoraproject.org

If you're interested in getting nagios 3 ready and into Fedora, I could
certainly use help with that.


Hi,
I will register a bugzilla in a couple of hours with a upgrade request.
The changes required to upgrade to Nagios 3 isn't all that big spec
wise. There are some changes to the config format, so people should be
aware when upgrading.


I've been running this rpm in production for at least a month now.

This is the spec file:
http://www.sunnmore.net/div/nagios.spec

This is the source rpm:
http://www.sunnmore.net/div/nagios-3.0.3-1.src.rpm

--
Roy-Magne Mo

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 06-27-2008, 05:04 PM
"Michael Weiner"
 
Default Packaging of Nagios

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 12:47 PM, Roy-Magne Mo <rmo@sunnmore.net> wrote:

I will register a bugzilla in a couple of hours with a upgrade request. The changes required to upgrade to Nagios 3 isn't all that big spec wise. There are some changes to the config format, so people should be aware when upgrading.




I've been running this rpm in production for at least a month now.



This is the spec file:

http://www.sunnmore.net/div/nagios.spec



This is the source rpm:

http://www.sunnmore.net/div/nagios-3.0.3-1.src.rpm



Looking at the spec file, it isnt clear to me why there is an initrd patch for nagios? Could you please shed a little more light on that for me, please?

Thanks in advance
Michael Weiner


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 01:16 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org