FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Marketing

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 10-17-2008, 11:55 AM
"Arnav Kalra"
 
Default wikipedia goodbye redhat and fedora

why don't we have a long release (even no.) released every year which has support for 2 more long releases. scrap odd no. releases for fortnightly test releases like opensolaris.*

--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
 
Old 10-18-2008, 08:29 AM
Frank Murphy
 
Default wikipedia goodbye redhat and fedora

On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 17:25 +0530, Arnav Kalra wrote:
> why don't we have a long release (even no.) released every year which
> has support for 2 more long releases. scrap odd no. releases for
> fortnightly test releases like opensolaris.

Basically there's no interest in it.
I would say your flogging a dead horse.

Frank


--
gpg id EB547226 Revoked Forgot Password
aMSN: Frankly3D
http://www.frankly3d.com

--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
 
Old 10-18-2008, 09:18 PM
Rex Dieter
 
Default wikipedia goodbye redhat and fedora

Frank Murphy wrote:

> On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 17:25 +0530, Arnav Kalra wrote:
>> why don't we have a long release (even no.) released every year which
>> has support for 2 more long releases. scrap odd no. releases for
>> fortnightly test releases like opensolaris.
>
> Basically there's no interest in it.
> I would say your flogging a dead horse.

There's interest alright, though it's unclear at the moment whether that interest will develop into any *work* being done by those interested. Either way, probably not all that relevant for *this* list.

-- Rex

--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
 
Old 10-19-2008, 09:05 AM
Jonas Karlsson
 
Default wikipedia goodbye redhat and fedora

My question is: how will RH look upon a Fedora LTS distribution, that
upgrades correctly and easy when next LTS release is out. This will most
likely eat a part of the RHEL userbase. Will it even be possible for the
Fedora community to publish an LTS considering the above?


//Jonas




Rex Dieter wrote:

Frank Murphy wrote:



On Fri, 2008-10-17 at 17:25 +0530, Arnav Kalra wrote:


why don't we have a long release (even no.) released every year which
has support for 2 more long releases. scrap odd no. releases for
fortnightly test releases like opensolaris.


Basically there's no interest in it.
I would say your flogging a dead horse.



There's interest alright, though it's unclear at the moment whether that interest will develop into any *work* being done by those interested. Either way, probably not all that relevant for *this* list.

-- Rex




--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
 
Old 10-20-2008, 12:37 AM
Itamar - IspBrasil
 
Default wikipedia goodbye redhat and fedora

will eat some rh users.

but will also eat all centos users.

for redhat the best is the people using fedora instead of centos.


On 10/19/2008 7:05 AM, Jonas Karlsson wrote:
My question is: how will RH look upon a Fedora LTS distribution, that
upgrades correctly and easy when next LTS release is out. This will
most likely eat a part of the RHEL userbase. Will it even be possible
for the Fedora community to publish an LTS considering the above?


//Jonas





--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
 
Old 10-20-2008, 09:39 AM
"Arnav Kalra"
 
Default wikipedia goodbye redhat and fedora

but 2 yr support vs 7 yr support??

--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
 
Old 10-20-2008, 10:19 AM
Jonas Karlsson
 
Default wikipedia goodbye redhat and fedora

so if you look at it in the long run RH will get more users.. at first
they might see a drop in the RHEL userbase. next users using different
distros will switch to Fedora LTS, and in the long run some of the
Fedora LTS'ers will go for RHEL. They might even gain users!

//Jonas

Itamar - IspBrasil wrote:

will eat some rh users.

but will also eat all centos users.

for redhat the best is the people using fedora instead of centos.


On 10/19/2008 7:05 AM, Jonas Karlsson wrote:
My question is: how will RH look upon a Fedora LTS distribution, that
upgrades correctly and easy when next LTS release is out. This will
most likely eat a part of the RHEL userbase. Will it even be possible
for the Fedora community to publish an LTS considering the above?


//Jonas







--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 08:16 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org