|
|

07-19-2008, 02:39 AM
|
|
|
Zimbra changes license to address Fedora concerns
Hi
This paves the way for Zimbra to be packaged for Fedora. Good to see
Yahoo responding to the concerns expressed earlier.
http://www.zimbra.com/forums/announcements/19581-license-5-0-7-foss.html
"Just wanted to provide a heads up that, in collaboration with legal
counsel for the Fedora Community and Red Hat, we have made a minor tweak
to the Yahoo! Public License (YPL), Version 1.0.
...
Our colleagues in the Fedora community were concerned that the old
version of 6.2 did not give licensees enough certainty that they could
keep exercising their license, even if they followed its requirements.
We thought this change was a reasonable request, and we were very
pleased that we were able to respond to the Fedora community in the way
they asked. Many thanks to our Fedora friends for their input"
Rahul
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
|
|

07-19-2008, 05:29 PM
|
|
|
Zimbra changes license to address Fedora concerns
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
Hi
This paves the way for Zimbra to be packaged for Fedora. Good to see
Yahoo responding to the concerns expressed earlier.
http://www.zimbra.com/forums/announcements/19581-license-5-0-7-foss.html
"Just wanted to provide a heads up that, in collaboration with legal
counsel for the Fedora Community and Red Hat, we have made a minor tweak
to the Yahoo! Public License (YPL), Version 1.0.
...
Our colleagues in the Fedora community were concerned that the old
version of 6.2 did not give licensees enough certainty that they could
keep exercising their license, even if they followed its requirements.
We thought this change was a reasonable request, and we were very
pleased that we were able to respond to the Fedora community in the way
they asked. Many thanks to our Fedora friends for their input"
Amazing! Hell yeah!
This is awesome, and as far as I was involved, a direct result from
talking to Zimbra on the Red Hat Summit, where we showed them the exact
same paragraph.
Thanks to Karsten Wade as well!
-Jeroen
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
|
|

07-21-2008, 05:17 PM
|
|
|
Zimbra changes license to address Fedora concerns
On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 18:29 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
> This is awesome, and as far as I was involved, a direct result from
> talking to Zimbra on the Red Hat Summit, where we showed them the exact
> same paragraph.
>
> Thanks to Karsten Wade as well!
Many thanks as well to other fine Fedorans @redhat.com, Jennifer Venable
and Richard Fontana, who made clear the Fedora objections to the YPL.
- Karsten
--
Karsten Wade, Sr. Developer Community Mgr.
Dev Fu : http://developer.redhatmagazine.com
Fedora : http://quaid.fedorapeople.org
gpg key : AD0E0C41
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
|
|

07-22-2008, 03:24 AM
|
|
|
Zimbra changes license to address Fedora concerns
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 18:29 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
>
> > This is awesome, and as far as I was involved, a direct result from
> > talking to Zimbra on the Red Hat Summit, where we showed them the exact
> > same paragraph.
> >
> > Thanks to Karsten Wade as well!
>
> Many thanks as well to other fine Fedorans @redhat.com, Jennifer Venable
> and Richard Fontana, who made clear the Fedora objections to the YPL.
>
This is a pretty bug deal really, is there anything we're doing to help
them out? I know they're doing the right thing but a lot of its been at
our request AFAIK, extending the favor would be a good thing.
-Mike
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
|
|

07-22-2008, 03:37 AM
|
|
|
Zimbra changes license to address Fedora concerns
Mike McGrath wrote:
This is a pretty bug deal really, is there anything we're doing to help
them out? I know they're doing the right thing but a lot of its been at
our request AFAIK, extending the favor would be a good thing.
I don't know if this would be considered a favor but someone from Fedora
India team is working on packaging Zimbra for Fedora/helping Zimbra
upstream with packaging.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-isv-sig-list/2008-July/msg00000.html
If you have other ideas, let us know.
Rahul
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
|
|

07-22-2008, 07:38 AM
|
|
|
Zimbra changes license to address Fedora concerns
Mike McGrath wrote:
On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Karsten 'quaid' Wade wrote:
On Sat, 2008-07-19 at 18:29 +0200, Jeroen van Meeuwen wrote:
This is awesome, and as far as I was involved, a direct result from
talking to Zimbra on the Red Hat Summit, where we showed them the exact
same paragraph.
Thanks to Karsten Wade as well!
Many thanks as well to other fine Fedorans @redhat.com, Jennifer Venable
and Richard Fontana, who made clear the Fedora objections to the YPL.
This is a pretty bug deal really, is there anything we're doing to help
them out? I know they're doing the right thing but a lot of its been at
our request AFAIK, extending the favor would be a good thing.
The ISV SIG has started the initiative to package Zimbra for Fedora, and
I'm making it my personal vendetta to get it into EPEL as well.
Kind regards,
Jeroen van Meeuwen
-kanarip
--
Fedora-marketing-list mailing list
Fedora-marketing-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-marketing-list
|
|
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 04:19 PM.
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org
|