Self Introduction - Page 8

06-18-2011, 06:59 PM

On 18/06/11 11:20, Paul Flo Williams wrote:
> She might have been half joking. Although packaging fonts is theoretically
> easy because of the packaging templates we use, the state of upstream
> archives is often very poor, with no clear versioning, missing licenses
> and limited language coverage. Welcome :-)

Yes that is what I was thinking as well after looking at a few other
fonts on the wishlist. Upstream could be anybody producing and releasing
fonts with no set policy for releases or versioning in place.

> A foundry is an organisation or single person who issues fonts. The League
> of Moveable Type is one such, and our foundry abbreviation for them is
> tlomt. You'll find some of their other fonts have been packaged already,
> so taking a look at those src.rpms may give you some pointers.

Thanks, I guessed 'tlomt' as well which I guess was correct then. I
didn't know there were some already packaged, looking through those
.src.rpms would be hugely helpful.

> If you look through the wiki pages of fonts that have already been
> packaged, you'll find the bugzilla numbers of their review requests, and
> looking through some of the comments in those reviews will help you avoid
> common mistakes.

Yes, that is the other thing I was wondering about and I will look it up.

> I would recommend you join the fonts mailing list if you have further
> questions.

I have already done so and have joined the 'fonts-bugs' one as well just
in case.

Thanks for the welcome, Paul.

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

06-19-2011, 04:28 PM

Hi there,

*

My name is Yanchuan Nian.I got my master's degree

from Beijing Jiaotong University in the summer of 2009,

and now I'm working for NFS-China(National Fondamental

Software of China).In the past two years, I was

responsible for the distrobution of nfs-server,

a variant of CentOS.Currently,I'm setting up the

Fedora build system(Mock,Koji,Bohdi,Pungi,and so on)

on our servers.For I have gottern so much from Fedora

(CentOS is also derived from Fedora as we all know),

It's my pleasure if I could make Fedora better,even a little.

*

Thanks to someone who will review my first package.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714491

*

That's all.Thanks.

Yanchuan

*

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

06-19-2011, 05:39 PM

Yanchuan wrote:

Hi there,
My name is Yanchuan Nian.I got my master's degree
from Beijing Jiaotong University in the summer of 2009,
...
Thanks to someone who will review my first package.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714491

That's all.Thanks.
Yanchuan

I'll work on providing you some review feedback - ready for next
weekend, this will be my first - I still have some Fedora packaging
reading to do (aside from my own submissions).

Best Regards

Damian
--
Interlinux Engineering Foundation

Central, non-trading, administration, governance and dissemination of
foundation intellectual property and know-how.

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

06-19-2011, 11:18 PM

On 06/18/2011 11:20 AM, Paul Flo Williams wrote:
> The font packaging lifecycle is here:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle
>
> League Gothic is already on the wishlist, so its page is here:
>
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TLOMT_League_Gothic_fonts

I have now packaged this up and submitted it for review here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714408

Thanks

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

06-26-2011, 01:52 PM

(From digest - I have since switched digest off so I generate threaded
responses)

Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 18:39:20 +0100
From: Damian L Brasher <fedora@interlinux.org.uk>
Subject: Self Introduction
>>Yanchuan wrote:
>>
>> Thanks to someone who will review my first package.
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714491

>> That's all.Thanks.
>> Yanchuan

>I'll work on providing you some review feedback - ready for next
>weekend, this will be my first - I still have some Fedora packaging
>reading to do (aside from my own submissions).
>Best Regards
>Damian

I have provided you some informal review feedback.

Damian Brasher

--
Interlinux Engineering Foundation http://www.interlinux.org.uk

Central, non-trading, administration, governance and dissemination of
foundation intellectual property and know-how.

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

06-26-2011, 09:57 PM

ThanksÂ*Damian,and I will update my package this evening.

-----------------------------------

å¹´è‰³å·

åŸºç¡€è½¯ä»¶äº‹ä¸šæœ¬éƒ¨Â*Â* æŠ€æœ¯æœåŠ¡éƒ¨

ä¸*ç§‘æ–¹å¾·è½¯ä»¶æœ‰é™å…¬å¸ï¼ˆåŸºç¡€è½¯ä»¶å›½å® ¶å·¥ç¨‹ç*”ç©¶ä¸*å¿ƒï¼‰

åŒ—äº¬æµ·æ·€åŒºä¸*å…³æ‘å—å››è¡—4å·

Mail: Â* yanchuan@nfs-china.com

MSN: Â* Â*nianyanchuan@hotmail.com

Mobile: 13426012116

åœ¨ 2011-06-26, Sun, 21:55:37 ,Damian L Brasher å†™åˆ°ï¼š

(From digest - I have since switched digest off so I generate threaded responses) Date: Sun, 19 Jun 2011 18:39:20 +0100 From: Damian L Brasher Subject: Self Introduction >>Yanchuan wrote: >> >> Thanks to someone who will review my first package. >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714491 >> That's all.Thanks. >> Yanchuan >I'll work on providing you some review feedback - ready for next >weekend, this will be my first - I still have some Fedora packaging >reading to do (aside from my own submissions). >Best Regards >Damian I have provided you some informal review feedback. Damian Brasher -- Interlinux Engineering Foundation http://www.interlinux.org.uk Central, non-trading, administration, governance and dissemination of foundation intellectual property and know-how. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

07-02-2011, 12:51 PM

Hi,

So I have this package that I made, but it has no 'assigned' reviewer:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711547

if someone wouldn't mind doing this, once I am a packager myself, I wouldn't mind reviewing other's packages.

-rhl

On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 9:19 PM, Ryan Lewis <me@ryanlewis.net> wrote:

Hola Fedora developers,

My name is Ryan! Currently i'm a PhD student in computer science theory at dartmouth college. I'm a campus ambassador at dartmouth college. My research interests are in computational & applied topology for a brief introduction to field: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Topological_data_analysis.

I try to contribute to the community as a campus ambassador. I regularly give away install/live media buttons and stickers to just about everyone, and I use them as prizes when I TA computer science classes (which works really well for getting us dartmouth undergrads to contribute).

I've just joined this list, and I'm learning now about how to write RPM spec files, with my ultimate goal of maintaining a few packages.

I recently got my koji browser certs, and I've been reading the guidelines. I move pretty slowly on my own, if anyone nearby me is interested in helping me advance my packaging 'foo' as they say, i'd be open to the assistance!

Cheers,
-rhl

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

07-02-2011, 02:13 PM

On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Ryan Lewis <me@ryanlewis.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So I have this package that I made, but it has no 'assigned' reviewer:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711547
>
> if someone wouldn't mind doing this, once I am a packager myself, I wouldn't
> mind reviewing other's packages.

I'm not a sponsor but I listed some updates you need to your spec file.

And, please don't top post[1]

Thanks,
Richard

[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines#If_You_Are_Replying_to_a_M essage
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Sat Jul 2 17:30:01 2011
Return-path: <bounce-debian-kernel=tom=linux-archive.org@lists.debian.org>
Envelope-to: tom@linux-archive.org
Delivery-date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 17:11:36 +0300
Received: from liszt.debian.org ([82.195.75.100]:42702)
by s2.java-tips.org with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256)
(Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <bounce-debian-kernel=tom=linux-archive.org@lists.debian.org>)
id 1Qd0v2-0007nF-4P
for tom@linux-archive.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 17:11:36 +0300
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP
id 7502913A6847; Sat, 2 Jul 2011 14:15:14 +0000 (UTC)
Old-Return-Path: <debbugs@busoni.debian.org>
X-Original-To: lists-debian-kernel@liszt.debian.org
Delivered-To: lists-debian-kernel@liszt.debian.org
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4164113A678E
for <lists-debian-kernel@liszt.debian.org>; Sat, 2 Jul 2011 14:15:14 +0000 (UTC)
X-Virus-Scanned: at lists.debian.org with policy bank en-ht
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -5.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.9 tagged_above=-10000 required=5.3
tests=[BAYES_00=-2, FOURLA=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4] autolearn=no
Received: from liszt.debian.org ([127.0.0.1])
by localhost (lists.debian.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 2525)
with ESMTP id GbVNZe-XGf3P for <lists-debian-kernel@liszt.debian.org>;
Sat, 2 Jul 2011 14:15:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from busoni.debian.org (busoni.debian.org [140.211.15.34])
(using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
(Client did not present a certificate)
by liszt.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A535913A4406;
Sat, 2 Jul 2011 14:15:06 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from debbugs by busoni.debian.org with local (Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <debbugs@busoni.debian.org>)
id 1Qd0yN-00074q-Ay; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 14:15:03 +0000
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Bug#632373: closed by Ben Hutchings <ben@decadent.org.uk> (Re: Bug#632373: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 0000000000000010)
Reply-To: a.vasilishin@kpi.ua, 632373@bugs.debian.org
Resent-From: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=90=D0=BD=D0=B4=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=B9_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=92=D0=B0=D1=81=D0=B8=D0=BB=D0=B8=D1=88=D0= B8=D0=BD?= <a.vasilishin@kpi.ua>
Resent-To: debian-bugs-dist@lists.debian.org
Resent-CC: Debian Kernel Team <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
X-Loop: owner@bugs.debian.org
Resent-Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 14:15:01 +0000
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.632373.B632373.130961591526887@bugs.debia n.org>
X-Debian-PR-Message: followup 632373
X-Debian-PR-Package: linux-image-2.6-amd64
X-Debian-PR-Keywords:
X-Debian-PR-Source: linux-latest-2.6
Received: via spool by 632373-submit@bugs.debian.org id=B632373.130961591526887
(code B ref 632373); Sat, 02 Jul 2011 14:15:01 +0000
Received: (at 632373) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Jul 2011 14:11:55 +0000
X-Spam-Bayes: score:0.0000 Tokens: new, 11; hammy, 116; neutral, 41; spammy,
0. spammytokens: hammytokens:0.000-+--H*u:1.0b2, 0.000-+--H*UA:1.0b2,
0.000-+--sk:bendec, 0.000-+--sk:ben@dec, 0.000-+--D*decadent.org.uk
Received: from mail0.kpi.ua ([77.47.128.135] helo=mail1.kpi.ua)
by busoni.debian.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <a.vasilishin@kpi.ua>)
id 1Qd0vL-0006zH-F8
for 632373@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 14:11:55 +0000
Authentication-Results: mail1.kpi.ua; auth=pass (auth_dovecot_plain) smtp.mail=andron@kpi.ua
Received: from [10.122.3.90]
by mail1.kpi.ua with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
(Exim 4.72)
(envelope-from <a.vasilishin@kpi.ua>)
id 1Qd0vD-0002wo-4u
for 632373@bugs.debian.org; Sat, 02 Jul 2011 17:11:47 +0300
Message-ID: <4E0F2722.5000401@kpi.ua>
Date: Sat, 02 Jul 2011 17:11:46 +0300
From: =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=90=D0=BD=D0=B4=D1=80=D0=B5=D0=B9_?= =?UTF-8?Q?=D0=92=D0=B0=D1=81=D0=B8=D0=BB=D0=B8=D1=88=D0= B8=D0=BD?=
<a.vasilishin@kpi.ua>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; ru; rv:1.9.2.18) Gecko/20110616 Lightning/1.0b2 Thunderbird/3.1.11
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: 632373@bugs.debian.org
References: <20110701212619.GH29924@decadent.org.uk> <4E0E1CD2.6060309@kpi.ua> <handler.632373.D632373.13095555829960.notifdone@b ugs.debian.org>
In-Reply-To: <handler.632373.D632373.13095555829960.notifdone@b ugs.debian.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1251; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV at mail1.kpi.ua
X-Rc-Virus: 2007-09-13_01
X-Mailing-List: <debian-kernel@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/72369
X-Loop: debian-kernel@lists.debian.org
List-Id: <debian-kernel.lists.debian.org>
List-URL: <http://lists.debian.org/debian-kernel/>
List-Post: <mailto:debian-kernel@lists.debian.org>
List-Help: <mailto:debian-kernel-request@lists.debian.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:debian-kernel-request@lists.debian.org?subject=subscribe>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:debian-kernel-request@lists.debian.org?subject=unsubscribe>
Precedence: list
Resent-Sender: debian-kernel-request@lists.debian.org

I didn't load tpm module, it automatiacaly loaded by OS.
I am waiting for union mounts to get rid of aufs.

--
WBR, Andrey Vasilishin CDIG1-UANIC, CDIG1-RIPE

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kernel-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/4E0F2722.5000401@kpi.ua

07-02-2011, 02:26 PM

On Mon, 20 Jun 2011 00:18:00 +0100
Khusro Jaleel <mailing-lists@kerneljack.com> wrote:

> On 06/18/2011 11:20 AM, Paul Flo Williams wrote:
> > The font packaging lifecycle is here:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle
> >
> > League Gothic is already on the wishlist, so its page is here:
> >
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/TLOMT_League_Gothic_fonts
>
> I have now packaged this up and submitted it for review here:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714408

I'm going to try and review this later today.

kevin
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

07-03-2011, 01:53 AM

-rhl

On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 10:13 AM, Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@gmail.com> wrote:

On Sat, Jul 2, 2011 at 7:51 AM, Ryan Lewis <me@ryanlewis.net> wrote:

> Hi,

>

> So I have this package that I made, but it has no 'assigned' reviewer:

>

> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=711547

>

> if someone wouldn't mind doing this, once I am a packager myself, I wouldn't

> mind reviewing other's packages.

I'm not a sponsor but I listed some updates you need to your spec file.

And, please don't top post[1] *

Thanks,

Richard

[1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines#If_You_Are_Replying_to_a_M essage

--

devel mailing list

devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Thanks,

I have fixed these issues.. if someone could officially review me, that would be wonderful...

-rhl

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel