FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

» Linux Archive
Home
New Posts
Search
FAQ


Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora/Linux Management Tools

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 08-14-2008, 11:15 PM
"Daniel P. Berrange"
 
Default Installing RHEL 2 (yes, "*2*") inside a F9 KVM VM...

On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 05:55:51PM -0400, Cole Robinson wrote:
> Michael DeHaan wrote:
> > I'm finding that RHEL 2 (last dot release) does not seem to have a
> > virtual NIC of the type that Anaconda can discover.
> >
> > Has anyone tested EL2, and if so, should I be sending something extra
> > down to python virtinst for that?
> >
> > --Michael
> >
>
> Actually I just committed some work to virtinst that may help solve
> this issue.
>
> Try running qemu-kvm manually and testing out the -nic models. Try
> 'qemu-kvm -hda /any/old/file -net nic,model=?' to see a list of the
> available ones. See if you can find a model that works, and we can
> trivially put it in the virtinst os database. So if someone in
> the future tries

I've got to imagine that the ne2k NIC wil do the job, though I'm kinda
suprised there's no rtl8139 support.

> virt-install --os-type linux --os-variant rhel2.1 --blah ...
>
> We can automatically set the correct network model.

Excellant - I assume you've got that setup to use VirtIO for F9/10
and Ubuntu Hardy ?

Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|

_______________________________________________
et-mgmt-tools mailing list
et-mgmt-tools@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
 
Old 08-14-2008, 11:29 PM
"Daniel P. Berrange"
 
Default Installing RHEL 2 (yes, "*2*") inside a F9 KVM VM...

On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 06:21:58PM -0400, Michael DeHaan wrote:
>
> I'm not passing down variant now for virtinst API calls (but can
> probably do this in a future
> release if the user supplies it). Is there a suggestion to just make it
> default to the compatible NIC that would
> be good for all Fedora/RHEL (or are there performance issues in doing
> this or something)?

That's the situation we've got already - we compile Xen and KVM to use
the rtl8139 nic since that's the best lowest-common denominator. It was
a barely passable approach so far, but with VirtIO it is now past its sell
by date and we have to key off os type/variant. If we don't then we'll
be limiting guests to 1/100 of the their potential performance. Not cool


Daniel
--
|: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :|
|: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :|
|: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :|
|: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :|

_______________________________________________
et-mgmt-tools mailing list
et-mgmt-tools@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/et-mgmt-tools
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 10:08 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org