On Sun, 2008-05-04 at 12:46 -0400, Ricky Zhou wrote:
> It'd be really useful to have awstats track download.fp.o and
> torrent.fp.o. Normally, I wouldn't mention this until after the change
> freeze, but it's really low risk, and we could use this to get a lot of
> valuable statistics during the mass downloading following the release.
> I don't think download.fp.o is in the config yet, and torrent.fp.o is at
> http://fedoraproject.org/awstats/torrent/, but it doesn't seem to be
> working (no stats).
>

How will torrent.fp.o httpd stats help us?

I mean aren't the important torrent stats in the torrent itself?

-sv


_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

On 2008-05-05 12:27:40 AM, seth vidal wrote:
> How will torrent.fp.o httpd stats help us?
>
> I mean aren't the important torrent stats in the torrent itself?
Oh wow, yet another good point. It looks like everything I was
interested in is at http://torrent.fedoraproject.org:6969/.
Eeeexcellent!

Thanks again,
Ricky
_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

On 2008-05-05 01:23:13 AM, Ricky Zhou wrote:
> Oh wow, yet another good point. It looks like everything I was
> interested in is at http://torrent.fedoraproject.org:6969/.
Whoops, I take that back - it doesn't seem to give a downloads vs. time
like awstats did. Still, I'll ask around sometime after the freeze.

Thanks,
Ricky
_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list