Curiosity FedoraHosted
 

Couldn't see this in Infra SOP

What criteria governs the Upgrading of major compenents of FedoraHosted
FedoraN+, Trac, *sql*, the underlying infra,
not the hosted projects themselves.

--
Regards,
Frank
"Jack of all, fubars"
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructureN���m5������zï¿½ï¿ ½q��}��k�7����Z�(^rG�U�� ҥ���Ƭ�)��:Óª'y�%{�6�֫�×�� Æ*y��t�jb޽���JÖ*����

Curiosity FedoraHosted
 

On 9 October 2012 01:09, Frank Murphy <frankly3d@gmail.com> wrote:
> Couldn't see this in Infra SOP
>
> What criteria governs the Upgrading of major compenents of FedoraHosted
> FedoraN+, Trac, *sql*, the underlying infra,
> not the hosted projects themselves.

Usually a security fix or upgrade of package in EPEL. To get them
upgraded into EPEL it needs to show that upgrading to it won't break
existing systems. If a break would occur then the package needs to be
named appropriately (eg if trac-0.9 wont work with anything sooner
then a package called trac09 needs to be created and put into epel.
Then a test period of how we would update to that (how much downtime
etc) would occur.)

> --
> Regards,
> Frank
> "Jack of all, fubars"
> _______________________________________________
> infrastructure mailing list
> infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure



--
Stephen J Smoogen.
"Don't derail a useful feature for the 99% because you're not in it."
Linus Torvalds
"Years ago my mother used to say to me,... Elwood, you must be oh
so smart or oh so pleasant. Well, for years I was smart. I
recommend pleasant. You may quote me." —James Stewart as Elwood P. Dowd
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure