Change Request: git-18.104.22.168-2
On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> On 08/03/2010 07:49 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > I'd like to use this build:
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2376842
> > on pkgs01 via the infrastructure repo to fix this problem:
> > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/620805
> > Can I get 2+1's (to sign it, add it to the repo and update it on pkgs01).
> > It should be easy to revert if something goes wrong though I talked with
> > tmz (a git maintainer) and he said it should be a pretty safe upgrade.
> While I'm not opposed to this upgrade, I wonder if I missed something.
> When I became aware of this bug, it only seemed to effect client side
> installs, that is users who had the bad build could not clone from
> pkgs01. But users who had a good build could, without any change to the
> infrastructure on pkgs01. Is there a use case failure I'm missing?
I think you're right actually, tmz and I discussed on #fedora-admin and
realized after we upgraded it that it didn't much make a difference on the
infrastructure mailing list