FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Infrastructure

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 08-03-2010, 02:49 PM
Mike McGrath
 
Default Change Request: git-1.7.2.1-2

I'd like to use this build:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2376842

on pkgs01 via the infrastructure repo to fix this problem:

http://bugzilla.redhat.com/620805

Can I get 2+1's (to sign it, add it to the repo and update it on pkgs01).
It should be easy to revert if something goes wrong though I talked with
tmz (a git maintainer) and he said it should be a pretty safe upgrade.


-Mike

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
 
Old 08-03-2010, 02:53 PM
 
Default Change Request: git-1.7.2.1-2

+1

--
Matt Domsch
Technology Strategist
Dell | Office of the CTO

-----Original Message-----
From: infrastructure-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:infrastructure-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Mike McGrath
Sent: Tuesday, August 03, 2010 9:49 AM
To: Infrastructure
Subject: Change Request: git-1.7.2.1-2

I'd like to use this build:

http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2376842

on pkgs01 via the infrastructure repo to fix this problem:

http://bugzilla.redhat.com/620805

Can I get 2+1's (to sign it, add it to the repo and update it on pkgs01).
It should be easy to revert if something goes wrong though I talked with tmz (a git maintainer) and he said it should be a pretty safe upgrade.


-Mike

_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
 
Old 08-03-2010, 02:55 PM
seth vidal
 
Default Change Request: git-1.7.2.1-2

On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 09:49 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> I'd like to use this build:
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2376842
>
> on pkgs01 via the infrastructure repo to fix this problem:
>
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/620805
>
> Can I get 2+1's (to sign it, add it to the repo and update it on pkgs01).
> It should be easy to revert if something goes wrong though I talked with
> tmz (a git maintainer) and he said it should be a pretty safe upgrade.
>
>

+1
-sv


_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
 
Old 08-03-2010, 03:13 PM
Dennis Gilmore
 
Default Change Request: git-1.7.2.1-2

On Tuesday, August 03, 2010 09:49:22 am Mike McGrath wrote:
> I'd like to use this build:
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2376842
>
> on pkgs01 via the infrastructure repo to fix this problem:
>
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/620805
>
> Can I get 2+1's (to sign it, add it to the repo and update it on pkgs01).
> It should be easy to revert if something goes wrong though I talked with
> tmz (a git maintainer) and he said it should be a pretty safe upgrade.
+1

Ill get it signed and pushed now

Dennis
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
 
Old 08-06-2010, 06:55 PM
Jesse Keating
 
Default Change Request: git-1.7.2.1-2

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 08/03/2010 07:49 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> I'd like to use this build:
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2376842
>
> on pkgs01 via the infrastructure repo to fix this problem:
>
> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/620805
>
> Can I get 2+1's (to sign it, add it to the repo and update it on pkgs01).
> It should be easy to revert if something goes wrong though I talked with
> tmz (a git maintainer) and he said it should be a pretty safe upgrade.
>
>

While I'm not opposed to this upgrade, I wonder if I missed something.
When I became aware of this bug, it only seemed to effect client side
installs, that is users who had the bad build could not clone from
pkgs01. But users who had a good build could, without any change to the
infrastructure on pkgs01. Is there a use case failure I'm missing?

- --
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom˛ is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkxcWokACgkQ4v2HLvE71NXPQACgj5nPmdEktp fwvolI07RAMrAo
z1MAoI8odu9qH6tK1QVO7Wz/xL4fEZIG
=A+y9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
 
Old 08-06-2010, 08:36 PM
Mike McGrath
 
Default Change Request: git-1.7.2.1-2

On Fri, 6 Aug 2010, Jesse Keating wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 08/03/2010 07:49 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> > I'd like to use this build:
> >
> > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2376842
> >
> > on pkgs01 via the infrastructure repo to fix this problem:
> >
> > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/620805
> >
> > Can I get 2+1's (to sign it, add it to the repo and update it on pkgs01).
> > It should be easy to revert if something goes wrong though I talked with
> > tmz (a git maintainer) and he said it should be a pretty safe upgrade.
> >
> >
>
> While I'm not opposed to this upgrade, I wonder if I missed something.
> When I became aware of this bug, it only seemed to effect client side
> installs, that is users who had the bad build could not clone from
> pkgs01. But users who had a good build could, without any change to the
> infrastructure on pkgs01. Is there a use case failure I'm missing?
>

I think you're right actually, tmz and I discussed on #fedora-admin and
realized after we upgraded it that it didn't much make a difference on the
server.

-Mike
_______________________________________________
infrastructure mailing list
infrastructure@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/infrastructure
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 10:37 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org