On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Clint Savage wrote:

> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Máirín Duffy <duffy@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
> >
> > Hey folks,
> >
> > I was wondering if anyone had interest in setting up a Wordpress MU install for Fedora's infrastructure?
> >
> > Gerold Kassube on the marketing team had this cool idea to set up a blog per Fedora foundation (freedom, friends, features, first) and the multiuser capabilities of wordpress seem ideal to drive the project.
> >
> > Let me know if you have any interest in this. It would be really, really useful for Fedora's marketing.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > ~m
>
> I'd like you to sell me on the reason for four different blogs
> (essentially what WP-MU gives) as I've set up WP-MU before and it's
> pretty easy...
>
> My concern is that it would be just as easy to create topics in one
> blog and just customize pages to pull based upon topic. Pretty easy
> to do actually.
>
> So anyway, if you can make a good argument for MU, I'd love to help.
>

actually MU was picked a long time ago, just no one has had time to set it
up.

-Mike______________________________________________ _
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

2009/3/5 Mike McGrath <mmcgrath@redhat.com>:
> On Thu, 5 Mar 2009, Clint Savage wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 3:18 PM, Máirín Duffy <duffy@fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hey folks,
>> >
>> > I was wondering if anyone had interest in setting up a Wordpress MU install for Fedora's infrastructure?
>> >
>> > Gerold Kassube on the marketing team had this cool idea to set up a blog per Fedora foundation (freedom, friends, features, first) and the multiuser capabilities of wordpress seem ideal to drive the project.
>> >
>> > Let me know if you have any interest in this. It would be really, really useful for Fedora's marketing.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > ~m
>>
>> I'd like you to sell me on the reason for four different blogs
>> (essentially what WP-MU gives) as I've set up WP-MU before and it's
>> pretty easy...
>>
>> My concern is that it would be just as easy to create topics in one
>> blog and just customize pages to pull based upon topic. *Pretty easy
>> to do actually.
>>
>> So anyway, if you can make a good argument for MU, I'd love to help.
>>
>
> actually MU was picked a long time ago, just no one has had time to set it
> up.
>
> * * * *-Mike
> _______________________________________________

Mike,

Do you have a link to the mailing list thread? I'd like to read up on
it. I like MU, don't get me wrong, just wonder why it was chosen.

Clint

_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

Clint Savage wrote:


Mike,

Do you have a link to the mailing list thread? I'd like to read up on
it. I like MU, don't get me wrong, just wonder why it was chosen.


We wanted it for a Fedora News site. Refer

https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/178

Rahul

_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

Rahul Sundaram wrote:

Clint Savage wrote:


Mike,

Do you have a link to the mailing list thread? I'd like to read up on
it. I like MU, don't get me wrong, just wonder why it was chosen.


We wanted it for a Fedora News site. Refer

https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/178


At this point, I think we're blocked on a theme (outside my skillset).
I think jonrob was going to look at this time-permitting.


If we've made progress on this front, I can help w/ the puppetization,
if that's still outstanding.


--Bret

_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

Bret McMillan wrote:

Rahul Sundaram wrote:

Clint Savage wrote:


Mike,

Do you have a link to the mailing list thread? I'd like to read up on
it. I like MU, don't get me wrong, just wonder why it was chosen.


We wanted it for a Fedora News site. Refer

https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/178


At this point, I think we're blocked on a theme (outside my skillset). I
think jonrob was going to look at this time-permitting.


If we've made progress on this front, I can help w/ the puppetization,
if that's still outstanding.


If you can get an instance up I can poke with, I can write the theme.

~m

_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

Bret McMillan wrote:

Rahul Sundaram wrote:

Clint Savage wrote:


Mike,

Do you have a link to the mailing list thread? I'd like to read up on
it. I like MU, don't get me wrong, just wonder why it was chosen.


We wanted it for a Fedora News site. Refer

https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/178


At this point, I think we're blocked on a theme (outside my skillset). I
think jonrob was going to look at this time-permitting.


Jon Rob won't have time for this for a while.

http://jonrob.wordpress.com/2009/03/09/time-out/

Mo, if you can get a theme going, I would like to launch this news site
soon, ahead of Fedora 11. Thanks for the help.


Rahul

_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

Thu Mar 12 21:30:01 2009
Return-path: <ubuntu-users-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com>
Envelope-to: tom@linux-archive.org
Delivery-date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:54:16 +0200
Received: from chlorine.canonical.com ([91.189.94.204]:58331)
by s2.java-tips.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69)
(envelope-from <ubuntu-users-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com>)
id 1Lhq2q-0005FJ-0P
for tom@linux-archive.org; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 20:54:16 +0200
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=chlorine.canonical.com)
by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <ubuntu-users-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com>)
id 1Lhq65-0006Te-R0; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:57:37 +0000
Received: from ti-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.142.185])
by chlorine.canonical.com with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <evuraan@gmail.com>) id 1Lhq5z-0006P9-2w
for ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com; Thu, 12 Mar 2009 18:57:31 +0000
Received: by ti-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id u3so1091039tia.20
for <ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com>;
Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:57:13 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.76.3 with SMTP id a3mr443430vck.119.1236884232348; Thu, 12
Mar 2009 11:57:12 -0700 (PDT)

Date: Thu, 12 Mar 2009 11:57:12 -0700
Message-ID: <6fbcd0710903121157m124d103aw2d01ee9ac22dd7aa@mail .gmail.com>
Subject: bash "let" barfs on addition
From: =?UTF-8?B?RXZ1cmFhbjo64LSP4LS14LWC4LSw4LS+4LSo4LWN4oCNIA ==?=
<evuraan@gmail.com>
To: "Ubuntu user technical support,
not for general discussions" <ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com>
X-BeenThere: ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.8
Precedence: list
Reply-To: "Ubuntu user technical support,
not for general discussions" <ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com>
List-Id: "Ubuntu user technical support,
not for general discussions" <ubuntu-users.lists.ubuntu.com>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users>,
<mailto:ubuntu-users-request@lists.ubuntu.com?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-users>
List-Post: <mailto:ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com>
List-Help: <mailto:ubuntu-users-request@lists.ubuntu.com?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users>,
<mailto:ubuntu-users-request@lists.ubuntu.com?subject=subscribe>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: ubuntu-users-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com
Errors-To: ubuntu-users-bounces@lists.ubuntu.com

Greetings y'all..!

Seen this sort of behaviour before? :

mybash:> a="7540113804746346429"
mybash:> b="4660046610375530309"
mybash:> let c=(a+b)
mybash:> echo $c
-6246583658587674878

The correct answer should have been: 12200160415121876738

mybash:> echo "$a+$b" |bc -l
12200160415121876738


mybash:> bash --version
GNU bash, version 3.2.25(1)-release (i486-pc-linux-gnu)
Copyright (C) 2005 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
mybash:>

I know, I can use bc,dc,awk, python and even a desk calculator wide
enough - but, I am curious as to why is "let" letting us down?

Does a known bug exist already?

Any input would be much appreciated, many thanks in advance.!

--
ubuntu-users mailing list
ubuntu-users@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-users

Bret McMillan wrote:

Rahul Sundaram wrote:

Clint Savage wrote:


Mike,

Do you have a link to the mailing list thread? I'd like to read up on
it. I like MU, don't get me wrong, just wonder why it was chosen.


We wanted it for a Fedora News site. Refer

https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/178


At this point, I think we're blocked on a theme (outside my skillset). I
think jonrob was going to look at this time-permitting.


If we've made progress on this front, I can help w/ the puppetization,
if that's still outstanding.


Should be set:

http://duffy.fedorapeople.org/webdesign/fedora-wordpress-theme/

~m

_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list

Máirí*n Duffy wrote:
> Bret McMillan wrote:
>> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>>> Clint Savage wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Mike,
>>>>
>>>> Do you have a link to the mailing list thread? I'd like to read up on
>>>> it. I like MU, don't get me wrong, just wonder why it was chosen.
>>>
>>> We wanted it for a Fedora News site. Refer
>>>
>>> https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/178
>>
>> At this point, I think we're blocked on a theme (outside my skillset).
>> I think jonrob was going to look at this time-permitting.
>>
>> If we've made progress on this front, I can help w/ the puppetization,
>> if that's still outstanding.
>
> Should be set:
>
> http://duffy.fedorapeople.org/webdesign/fedora-wordpress-theme/

Thanks Mo. Brett, can you help move this forward?

Rahul

_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list