FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Infrastructure

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 07-07-2008, 04:07 PM
Robin Norwood
 
Default FAS instance on publictest10?

Hi,

I've been trying to use the FAS instance on publictest10, and it's
acting very strangely. Basically, after a restart, it goes like this:

o FAS works fine, both from the web UI and using the API for a few
minutes.

o After a few minutes, it starts to give 500 errors with stuff like
this in the error_log:

[Mon Jul 07 08:23:07 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] File
"/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/fas/model/fasmodel.py", line 6 1, in ?
[Mon Jul 07 08:23:07 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] PeopleTable =
Table('people', metadata, autoload=True)
[...]
[Mon Jul 07 08:23:07 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] File
"/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/sqlalchemy/databases/postgres. py",
line 462, in reflecttable [Mon Jul 07 08:23:07 2008] [error] [client
127.0.0.1] raise exceptions.NoSuchTableError(table.name) [Mon Jul
07 08:23:07 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] NoSuchTableError: people


Very strange.

Any ideas what's going on here? If FAS on publictest10 is going
through some development upheaval, I can set one up locally for
development and try a public deployment of amber again in a few weeks.

Thanks,

-RN

--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.

"The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone."
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching

_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
 
Old 07-08-2008, 03:06 PM
Robin Norwood
 
Default FAS instance on publictest10?

On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 12:07:50 -0400
Robin Norwood <rnorwood@redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to use the FAS instance on publictest10, and it's
> acting very strangely. Basically, after a restart, it goes like this:
>
> o FAS works fine, both from the web UI and using the API for a few
> minutes.
>
> o After a few minutes, it starts to give 500 errors with stuff like
> this in the error_log:
>
> [Mon Jul 07 08:23:07 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] File
> "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/fas/model/fasmodel.py", line 6 1,
> in ? [Mon Jul 07 08:23:07 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1]
> PeopleTable = Table('people', metadata, autoload=True)
> [...]
> [Mon Jul 07 08:23:07 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] File
> "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/sqlalchemy/databases/postgres. py",
> line 462, in reflecttable [Mon Jul 07 08:23:07 2008] [error] [client
> 127.0.0.1] raise exceptions.NoSuchTableError(table.name) [Mon Jul
> 07 08:23:07 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] NoSuchTableError: people
>
>
> Very strange.
>
> Any ideas what's going on here? If FAS on publictest10 is going
> through some development upheaval, I can set one up locally for
> development and try a public deployment of amber again in a few weeks.

This still seems to be broken - anybody have any suggestions? I was
hoping to let the websites team and others have a look at what I've got
so far so I can get some feedback this week.

-RN

--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.

"The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone."
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching

_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
 
Old 07-08-2008, 09:46 PM
Robin Norwood
 
Default FAS instance on publictest10?

Ricky set up a FAS instance on pt9 that seems to work fine so far, so
I'm done whining. :-)

Thanks!

-RN

--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.

"The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone."
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching

_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
 
Old 07-09-2008, 12:48 AM
Luke Macken
 
Default FAS instance on publictest10?

On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 05:46:07PM -0400, Robin Norwood wrote:
> Ricky set up a FAS instance on pt9 that seems to work fine so far, so
> I'm done whining. :-)

Hmmm, so what is the difference between the pt10 and pt9 deployments?
We've been testing the bleeding-edge python-fedora package on pt10, so
if that is causing the issues we definitely need to track it down asap.

luke

_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
 
Old 07-09-2008, 12:51 AM
Ricky Zhou
 
Default FAS instance on publictest10?

On 2008-07-08 08:48:57 PM, Luke Macken wrote:
> Hmmm, so what is the difference between the pt10 and pt9 deployments?
> We've been testing the bleeding-edge python-fedora package on pt10, so
> if that is causing the issues we definitely need to track it down asap.
I manually updated python-fedora on pt9 to test that as well - so far,
so good, although I still never figured out what was causing the
NoSuchTable errors on publictest10.

Thanks,
Ricky
_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
 
Old 07-09-2008, 03:12 PM
Robin Norwood
 
Default FAS instance on publictest10?

On Tue, 8 Jul 2008 20:51:04 -0400
Ricky Zhou <ricky@fedoraproject.org> wrote:

> On 2008-07-08 08:48:57 PM, Luke Macken wrote:
> > Hmmm, so what is the difference between the pt10 and pt9
> > deployments? We've been testing the bleeding-edge python-fedora
> > package on pt10, so if that is causing the issues we definitely
> > need to track it down asap.
> I manually updated python-fedora on pt9 to test that as well - so far,
> so good, although I still never figured out what was causing the
> NoSuchTable errors on publictest10.

Well, this morning things started misbehaving on pt9, too...just
differently. :-(

>From web browser, if I go to:
http://publictest9.fedoraproject.org/accounts/

and log in, I get redirected to publictest10! If I browse back to
pt9, it appears I did log in successfully. The equivalent thing
happens if I log out from pt9.

Looking at the /etc/fas.cfg on pt9, this is probably the cause of that:

samadhi.baseurl = 'http://publictest10.fedoraproject.org'

I didn't fix it b/c I haven't familiarized myself with your puppet
stuff yet.


Second, a few minutes ago I was getting 500 errors from
that fas instance when logging in from my app, but now I can't reproduce
it. :-/

Looking at the logs, it looks like the 500 errors are related to this
error:

[Wed Jul 09 14:59:40 2008] [error] raise
exceptions.DBAPIError.instance(statement, parameters, e, connection_invalidated=
is_disconnect)
[Wed Jul 09 14:59:40 2008] [error] ProgrammingError: (ProgrammingError)
server closed the connection unexpectedly
[Wed Jul 09 14:59:40 2008] [error] This probably means the server
terminated abnormally
[Wed Jul 09 14:59:40 2008] [error] before or while processing the
request.
[Wed Jul 09 14:59:40 2008] [error] 'SELECT session.id AS session_id,
session.data AS session_data, session.expiration_time A
S session_expiration_time
FROM session
WHERE session.id =
%(param_1)s' {'param_1': '620e1904fbcde17dacb96779e77ec9db223
48554'}


But, like I said, they aren't happening now. Curious. Maybe it just
needed a second cup of coffee.

Thanks,

-RN

--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.

"The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone."
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching

_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 04:27 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org