Any ideas what's going on here? If FAS on publictest10 is going
through some development upheaval, I can set one up locally for
development and try a public deployment of amber again in a few weeks.
Thanks,
-RN
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
"The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone."
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching
_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
07-08-2008, 03:06 PM
Robin Norwood
FAS instance on publictest10?
On Mon, 7 Jul 2008 12:07:50 -0400
Robin Norwood <rnorwood@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been trying to use the FAS instance on publictest10, and it's
> acting very strangely. Basically, after a restart, it goes like this:
>
> o FAS works fine, both from the web UI and using the API for a few
> minutes.
>
> o After a few minutes, it starts to give 500 errors with stuff like
> this in the error_log:
>
> [Mon Jul 07 08:23:07 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] File
> "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/fas/model/fasmodel.py", line 6 1,
> in ? [Mon Jul 07 08:23:07 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1]
> PeopleTable = Table('people', metadata, autoload=True)
> [...]
> [Mon Jul 07 08:23:07 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] File
> "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/sqlalchemy/databases/postgres. py",
> line 462, in reflecttable [Mon Jul 07 08:23:07 2008] [error] [client
> 127.0.0.1] raise exceptions.NoSuchTableError(table.name) [Mon Jul
> 07 08:23:07 2008] [error] [client 127.0.0.1] NoSuchTableError: people
>
>
> Very strange.
>
> Any ideas what's going on here? If FAS on publictest10 is going
> through some development upheaval, I can set one up locally for
> development and try a public deployment of amber again in a few weeks.
This still seems to be broken - anybody have any suggestions? I was
hoping to let the websites team and others have a look at what I've got
so far so I can get some feedback this week.
-RN
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
"The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone."
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching
_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
07-08-2008, 09:46 PM
Robin Norwood
FAS instance on publictest10?
Ricky set up a FAS instance on pt9 that seems to work fine so far, so
I'm done whining. :-)
Thanks!
-RN
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
"The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone."
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching
_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
07-09-2008, 12:48 AM
Luke Macken
FAS instance on publictest10?
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 05:46:07PM -0400, Robin Norwood wrote:
> Ricky set up a FAS instance on pt9 that seems to work fine so far, so
> I'm done whining. :-)
Hmmm, so what is the difference between the pt10 and pt9 deployments?
We've been testing the bleeding-edge python-fedora package on pt10, so
if that is causing the issues we definitely need to track it down asap.
luke
_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
07-09-2008, 12:51 AM
Ricky Zhou
FAS instance on publictest10?
On 2008-07-08 08:48:57 PM, Luke Macken wrote:
> Hmmm, so what is the difference between the pt10 and pt9 deployments?
> We've been testing the bleeding-edge python-fedora package on pt10, so
> if that is causing the issues we definitely need to track it down asap.
I manually updated python-fedora on pt9 to test that as well - so far,
so good, although I still never figured out what was causing the
NoSuchTable errors on publictest10.
Thanks,
Ricky
_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
> On 2008-07-08 08:48:57 PM, Luke Macken wrote:
> > Hmmm, so what is the difference between the pt10 and pt9
> > deployments? We've been testing the bleeding-edge python-fedora
> > package on pt10, so if that is causing the issues we definitely
> > need to track it down asap.
> I manually updated python-fedora on pt9 to test that as well - so far,
> so good, although I still never figured out what was causing the
> NoSuchTable errors on publictest10.
Well, this morning things started misbehaving on pt9, too...just
differently. :-(
>From web browser, if I go to:
http://publictest9.fedoraproject.org/accounts/
and log in, I get redirected to publictest10! If I browse back to
pt9, it appears I did log in successfully. The equivalent thing
happens if I log out from pt9.
Looking at the /etc/fas.cfg on pt9, this is probably the cause of that:
I didn't fix it b/c I haven't familiarized myself with your puppet
stuff yet.
Second, a few minutes ago I was getting 500 errors from
that fas instance when logging in from my app, but now I can't reproduce
it. :-/
Looking at the logs, it looks like the 500 errors are related to this
error:
[Wed Jul 09 14:59:40 2008] [error] raise
exceptions.DBAPIError.instance(statement, parameters, e, connection_invalidated=
is_disconnect)
[Wed Jul 09 14:59:40 2008] [error] ProgrammingError: (ProgrammingError)
server closed the connection unexpectedly
[Wed Jul 09 14:59:40 2008] [error] This probably means the server
terminated abnormally
[Wed Jul 09 14:59:40 2008] [error] before or while processing the
request.
[Wed Jul 09 14:59:40 2008] [error] 'SELECT session.id AS session_id,
session.data AS session_data, session.expiration_time A
S session_expiration_time
FROM session
WHERE session.id =
%(param_1)s' {'param_1': '620e1904fbcde17dacb96779e77ec9db223
48554'}
But, like I said, they aren't happening now. Curious. Maybe it just
needed a second cup of coffee.
Thanks,
-RN
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
"The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone."
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching
_______________________________________________
Fedora-infrastructure-list mailing list
Fedora-infrastructure-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-infrastructure-list
FAS instance on publictest10?
