Complex search filter doesnt work properly
On 08/15/2012 11:00 AM, Das, Jyoti Ranjan (STSD) wrote:
Hi,
*
Below is one of the few complex filters
which don’t work properly
*
*
Example:
*
Filter: *"(&(&(uid=test1)(cn=t1
est))(&(gidnumber=20))(uidnumber=2559)(&(sn=est))) "
*
In this case, filter ignores “uidnumber=2559”*
after assigning the decoders to this filter. Log details are
given below how it actually behaves
*
[07/Aug/2012:09:40:12
+0200]:09:40:12 +0200] get_filter -* after optimize:
(&(&(uid=test1)(cn=t1
est))(&(gidNumber=20))(uidNumber=2559)(&))
[07/Aug/2012 get_filter - before optimize:
(&(&(uid=test1)(cn=t1
est))(&(gidNumber=20))(uidNumber=2559)(&))
[07/Aug/2012:09:40:12 +0200]
index_subsys_assign_filter_decoders - before: (&(&(uid=test1)(cn=t1
est))(&(gidNumber=20))(uidNumber=25
59)(&(sn=est)))****
---* Before assigning filter decoder it
looks like
[07/Aug/2012:09:40:13 +0200] - slapi_filter_free type 0xA0
[07/Aug/2012:09:40:13 +0200] - slapi_filter_free type 0xA0
[07/Aug/2012:09:40:13 +0200] - slapi_filter_free type 0xA0
[07/Aug/2012:09:40:13 +0200]
index_subsys_assign_filter_decoders -* after: (&(uid=test1)(cn=t1
est)(gidNumber=20)(sn=est)) ***-** here it missed “uidNumber=2559”
Is this a bug or its expected behavior? If yes, is there any
specific reason why it ignores this particular filter?
Not sure.* What version of 389-ds-base?* Can you reproduce this with
1.2.11?
The filter is quite strange, but not illegal afaik - there are 3
redundant & clauses.
*
*
Regards,
Jyoti
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
|
