FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Directory

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 03-25-2012, 04:36 PM
Tom Tucker
 
Default High CPU Consumption by ns-slapd

Hello! *I have eight 389 DS all running the same OS, same 389 DS version, handling the same LDAP data and with same HW specs. *For some reason my two dev systems are consistently showing higher cpu than the other 6 systems. *Any troubleshooting suggestions to help determine why this might be?

The two dev DS report the ns-slapd process consuming 0-90+% of the CPU. * The other six servers typically stay below 5%. *I have looked at logs, monitored the number of connections, memory consumption, etc. *I just can't explain it.

Any suggestions?
Thank you,
Tom

389-console-1.1.7-1.fc15.noarch389-ds-base-1.2.10-0.5.a5.fc15.i686
389-ds-console-doc-1.2.6-1.fc15.noarch389-admin-1.1.25-1.fc15.i686389-ds-1.2.2-1.fc15.noarch389-admin-console-1.1.8-1.fc15.noarch389-ds-base-libs-1.2.10-0.5.a5.fc15.i686
389-admin-console-doc-1.1.8-1.fc15.noarch389-ds-console-1.2.6-1.fc15.noarch389-dsgw-1.1.7-2.fc15.i686389-adminutil-1.1.14-1.fc15.i686
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
 
Old 03-26-2012, 01:25 PM
Rich Megginson
 
Default High CPU Consumption by ns-slapd

On 03/25/2012 10:36 AM, Tom Tucker wrote:


Hello! *I have eight 389 DS all running the same OS, same 389
DS version, handling the same LDAP data and with same HW specs.
*For some reason my two dev systems are consistently showing
higher cpu than the other 6 systems. *Any troubleshooting
suggestions to help determine why this might be?



The two dev DS report the ns-slapd process consuming 0-90+%
of the CPU. * The other six servers typically stay below 5%. *I
have looked at logs, monitored the number of connections, memory
consumption, etc. *I just can't explain it.



I strongly encourage you to upgrade from the 1.2.10 alpha 5 release
to the 1.2.10.4-2 release which should be in Stable if not already.





Any suggestions?



Thank you,



Tom







389-console-1.1.7-1.fc15.noarch
389-ds-base-1.2.10-0.5.a5.fc15.i686
389-ds-console-doc-1.2.6-1.fc15.noarch
389-admin-1.1.25-1.fc15.i686
389-ds-1.2.2-1.fc15.noarch
389-admin-console-1.1.8-1.fc15.noarch
389-ds-base-libs-1.2.10-0.5.a5.fc15.i686
389-admin-console-doc-1.1.8-1.fc15.noarch
389-ds-console-1.2.6-1.fc15.noarch
389-dsgw-1.1.7-2.fc15.i686
389-adminutil-1.1.14-1.fc15.i686






--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users





--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 09:47 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org