FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Directory

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 01-26-2011, 07:41 PM
Maurice James
 
Default RHEL6 support

Is it not possible to use Redhat Directory Service?
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*

*
*
*
*
From: 389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Hagopian
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 2:25 PM
To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Subject: [389-users] RHEL6 support
*
It looks like EPEL is now stable on RHEL6 but I do not see any 389ds packages in the epel or epel-testing repos. *Any idea when that is happening? *I'm setting up a new machine and wanted to start using RHEL6 if possible to take advantage of some of the new fun features of RHEL6.
*
Thanks for all your hard work, 389ds is great!
*
Sincerely,
*
Aaron Hagopian
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
 
Old 01-26-2011, 07:45 PM
Maurice James
 
Default RHEL6 support

Isn’t it possible to use Red Hat Directory Service
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
From: 389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org [mailto:389-users-bounces@lists.fedoraproject.org] On Behalf Of Aaron Hagopian
Sent: Wednesday, January 26, 2011 2:25 PM
To: General discussion list for the 389 Directory server project.
Subject: [389-users] RHEL6 support
*
It looks like EPEL is now stable on RHEL6 but I do not see any 389ds packages in the epel or epel-testing repos. *Any idea when that is happening? *I'm setting up a new machine and wanted to start using RHEL6 if possible to take advantage of some of the new fun features of RHEL6.
*
Thanks for all your hard work, 389ds is great!
*
Sincerely,
*
Aaron Hagopian
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
 
Old 01-26-2011, 07:52 PM
Rich Megginson
 
Default RHEL6 support

On 01/26/2011 12:25 PM, Aaron Hagopian wrote:
It looks like EPEL is now stable on RHEL6 but I do not
see any 389ds packages in the epel or epel-testing repos. *Any
idea when that is happening? *I'm setting up a new machine and
wanted to start using RHEL6 if possible to take advantage of some
of the new fun features of RHEL6.
389-ds-base will be going into RHEL 6 at some point.* We cannot put
it in EPEL6 because it would conflict.* We are interested in
suggestions about how to provide binary packages on EL6.






Thanks for all your hard work, 389ds is great!



Sincerely,



Aaron Hagopian


--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users





--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
 
Old 01-27-2011, 07:33 AM
Sean Murray
 
Default RHEL6 support

Rich Megginson wrote:

389-ds-base will be going into RHEL 6 at some point. We cannot put it
in EPEL6 because it would conflict. We are interested in suggestions
about how to provide binary packages on EL6.



pardon my ignorance, but what would it clash with ?

Cheers
Sean

--
A bus station is where a bus stops
A train station is where a train stops
On my desk, I have a work station
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
 
Old 01-27-2011, 01:25 PM
Rich Megginson
 
Default RHEL6 support

On 01/27/2011 01:33 AM, Sean Murray wrote:
Rich
Megginson wrote:




389-ds-base will be going into RHEL 6 at
some point.* We cannot put it in EPEL6 because it would
conflict.* We are interested in suggestions about how to provide
binary packages on EL6.







pardon my ignorance, but what would it clash with ?



389-ds-base in RHEL6.




Cheers


Sean






--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users





--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
 
Old 01-27-2011, 02:33 PM
Aaron Hagopian
 
Default RHEL6 support

389-ds-base will be going into RHEL 6 at
some point.* We cannot put it in EPEL6 because it would
conflict.* We are interested in suggestions about how to provide
binary packages on EL6.







pardon my ignorance, but what would it clash with ?



389-ds-base in RHEL6.


And I assume that's in the Directory Server channel because on my RHEL6 machine no 389-ds-base package exists and I do not have a subscription to Redhat Directory service. *Again working on my assumption that means that RH directory service is using the same package name as 389ds which would create the conflict. *So either 389-ds packages are renamed or cannot go in EPEL, now its making sense.


So is there some obstacle for the 389ds project to host its own yum repo?



--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
 
Old 01-27-2011, 02:41 PM
Rich Megginson
 
Default RHEL6 support

On 01/27/2011 08:33 AM, Aaron Hagopian wrote:









389-ds-base will be going into
RHEL 6 at some point.* We cannot put it in EPEL6
because it would conflict.* We are interested in
suggestions about how to provide binary packages on
EL6.





pardon my ignorance, but what would it clash with ?



389-ds-base in RHEL6.









And I assume that's in the Directory Server channel because
on my RHEL6 machine no 389-ds-base package exists and I do not
have a subscription to Redhat Directory service. *Again
working on my assumption that means that RH directory service
is using the same package name as 389ds which would create the
conflict. *So either 389-ds packages are renamed or cannot go
in EPEL, now its making sense.


389-ds-base is not _yet_ in RHEL6.* Will be there in 6.1 or 6.2.






So is there some obstacle for the 389ds project to host its
own yum repo?


Other than being a PITA?* But if that is the only way . . .














--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users





--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 02:31 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org