FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Directory

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 01-17-2011, 08:52 PM
Christopher Wood
 
Default schema for dns

Questions:


When was the dNSDomain schema deprecated in 389 DS?
Why was it deprecated in 389 DS?
What schema do 389 Directory Server or Red Hat Directory Server users customarily use to store DNS zones in their directories?
(Am I asking the right questions?)

As well, my thanks to the list denizens for your collective threads, you're all terribly educational.


Background:


The task is exploring DNS schema storage in ldap, to be a DNS server backend.

I can get the schema into 389 DS without any issues. I'm asking more for the "why" not the "how". So far everything is working out, but I'm concerned that I may have a blind spot in choice of schema. Am I going one way while the world goes another as far as ldap backend is concerned?


The PowerDNS LDAP Backend specifies the dNSDomain2 schema, a child of the dNSDomain schema.

http://www.linuxnetworks.de/doc/index.php/PowerDNS_ldapbackend


Here is previous discussion on this:

http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/2010-March/011146.html


In 2007 this was apparently added to the fedora-ds schema, if I'm reading it right:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=179956


An earlier email which discusses the issue and why it may have appeared in 2005:

http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/2005-July/000520.html
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 07:11 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org