After updating to the latest 389-ds packages I can connect to my admin console again but I happened to notice that the version displayed when I click on Directory Server shows 1.2.6 but yum says differently:
Summary * * : 389 Directory Server (base)URL * * * * : http://port389.org/License * * : GPLv2 with exceptionsDescription : 389 Directory Server is an LDAPv3 compliant server. *The base
** * * * * *: package includes the LDAP server and command line utilities for** * * * * *: server administration.
Obviously not a big deal but may confuse people. *This is on a completely up-to-date fedora 14 x86_64 machine.
Thanks,
Aaron
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
12-14-2010, 02:46 PM
Rich Megginson
incorrect version displayed in console
On 12/14/2010 08:39 AM, Aaron Hagopian wrote:
After updating to the latest 389-ds packages I can
connect to my admin console again but I happened to notice that
the version displayed when I click on Directory Server shows 1.2.6
but yum says differently:
Name * * * *: 389-ds-base
Arch * * * *: x86_64
Version * * : 1.2.7.2
Release * * : 1.fc14
Size * * * *: 5.5 M
Repo * * * *: installed
From repo * : updates
Summary * * : 389 Directory Server (base)
URL * * * * : http://port389.org/
License * * : GPLv2 with exceptions
Description : 389 Directory Server is an LDAPv3 compliant
server. *The base
** * * * * *: package includes the LDAP server and command
line utilities for
** * * * * *: server administration.
Obviously not a big deal but may confuse people. *This is on
a completely up-to-date fedora 14 x86_64 machine.
After upgrading, did you run
setup-ds-admin.pl -u
?
Thanks,
Aaron
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
12-14-2010, 02:59 PM
Aaron Hagopian
incorrect version displayed in console
I did not. *Basically just doing my regular updates, nothing from updates-testing so I didn't know I would need to take any user intervention. *After running that it DOES show the correct version.
Is that something for Fedora only or will my RHEL machines using EPEL need to do that as well when I upgrade those to 1.2.7.x?
On 12/14/2010 08:39 AM, Aaron Hagopian wrote:
After updating to the latest 389-ds packages I can
connect to my admin console again but I happened to notice that
the version displayed when I click on Directory Server shows 1.2.6
but yum says differently:
Name * * * *: 389-ds-base
Arch * * * *: x86_64
Version * * : 1.2.7.2
Release * * : 1.fc14
Size * * * *: 5.5 M
Repo * * * *: installed
From repo * : updates
Summary * * : 389 Directory Server (base)
URL * * * * : http://port389.org/
License * * : GPLv2 with exceptions
Description : 389 Directory Server is an LDAPv3 compliant
server. *The base
** * * * * *: package includes the LDAP server and command
line utilities for
** * * * * *: server administration.
Obviously not a big deal but may confuse people. *This is on
a completely up-to-date fedora 14 x86_64 machine.
After upgrading, did you run
setup-ds-admin.pl -u
?
Thanks,
Aaron
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
12-14-2010, 03:07 PM
Rich Megginson
incorrect version displayed in console
On 12/14/2010 08:59 AM, Aaron Hagopian wrote:
I did not. *Basically just doing my regular updates,
nothing from updates-testing so I didn't know I would need to take
any user intervention. *After running that it DOES show the
correct version.
Is that something for Fedora only or will my RHEL machines
using EPEL need to do that as well when I upgrade those to
1.2.7.x?
Yes.* The base packages themselves are automatically upgraded (i.e.
things like schema, local configuration, etc.)
The only things that cannot be done automatically are console
related (things like the version displayed in the console, console
specific configuration entries, etc.) because:
1) the configuration directory server must be up and running -
changes have to be made over LDAP
2) must have the admin password in order to make the changes
There is unfortunately no easy way to do this without user
intervention, that's why you are required to run setup-ds-admin.pl
-u to update this information.
Thanks,
Aaron*
2010/12/14 Rich Megginson <rmeggins@redhat.com>
On 12/14/2010 08:39 AM, Aaron Hagopian
wrote:
After updating to the latest
389-ds packages I can connect to my admin console
again but I happened to notice that the version
displayed when I click on Directory Server shows
1.2.6 but yum says differently:
Name * * * *: 389-ds-base
Arch * * * *: x86_64
Version * * : 1.2.7.2
Release * * : 1.fc14
Size * * * *: 5.5 M
Repo * * * *: installed
From repo * : updates
Summary * * : 389 Directory Server (base)
URL * * * * : http://port389.org/
License * * : GPLv2 with exceptions
Description : 389 Directory Server is an
LDAPv3 compliant server. *The base
** * * * * *: package includes the LDAP
server and command line utilities for
** * * * * *: server administration.
Obviously not a big deal but may confuse
people. *This is on a completely up-to-date fedora
14 x86_64 machine.
After upgrading, did you run
setup-ds-admin.pl -u
?
Thanks,
Aaron
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
12-15-2010, 07:12 PM
Aaron Hagopian
incorrect version displayed in console
Thanks your explanation makes sense. *
2010/12/14 Rich Megginson <rmeggins@redhat.com>
On 12/14/2010 08:59 AM, Aaron Hagopian wrote:
I did not. *Basically just doing my regular updates,
nothing from updates-testing so I didn't know I would need to take
any user intervention. *After running that it DOES show the
correct version.
Is that something for Fedora only or will my RHEL machines
using EPEL need to do that as well when I upgrade those to
1.2.7.x?
Yes.* The base packages themselves are automatically upgraded (i.e.
things like schema, local configuration, etc.)
The only things that cannot be done automatically are console
related (things like the version displayed in the console, console
specific configuration entries, etc.) because:
1) the configuration directory server must be up and running -
changes have to be made over LDAP
2) must have the admin password in order to make the changes
There is unfortunately no easy way to do this without user
intervention, that's why you are required to run setup-ds-admin.pl
-u to update this information.
Thanks,
Aaron*
2010/12/14 Rich Megginson <rmeggins@redhat.com>
On 12/14/2010 08:39 AM, Aaron Hagopian
wrote:
After updating to the latest
389-ds packages I can connect to my admin console
again but I happened to notice that the version
displayed when I click on Directory Server shows
1.2.6 but yum says differently:
Name * * * *: 389-ds-base
Arch * * * *: x86_64
Version * * : 1.2.7.2
Release * * : 1.fc14
Size * * * *: 5.5 M
Repo * * * *: installed
From repo * : updates
Summary * * : 389 Directory Server (base)
URL * * * * : http://port389.org/
License * * : GPLv2 with exceptions
Description : 389 Directory Server is an
LDAPv3 compliant server. *The base
** * * * * *: package includes the LDAP
server and command line utilities for
** * * * * *: server administration.
Obviously not a big deal but may confuse
people. *This is on a completely up-to-date fedora
14 x86_64 machine.
After upgrading, did you run
setup-ds-admin.pl -u
?
Thanks,
Aaron
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
incorrect version displayed in console
