Hi Rich,
I looked at both access log and error log.* The access log has an addition of ldap_add failure but the error log doesn't say anything about the failure on loading the 2nd database.
- David
Access Log
[23/Jun/2010:18:37:09 -0400] conn=12180 fd=118 slot=118 connection from 138.125.205.65 to 138.125.205.65
[23/Jun/2010:18:37:09 -0400] conn=12180 op=0 BIND dn="cn=Directory Manager" method=128 version=3
[23/Jun/2010:18:37:09 -0400] conn=12180 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=97 nentries=0 etime=0 dn="cn=tscei ldap directory manager"
[23/Jun/2010:18:37:09 -0400] conn=12180 op=1 ADD dn="cn=import_2010_6_23_18_37_9, cn=import, cn=tasks, cn=config"
[23/Jun/2010:18:37:11 -0400] conn=12180 op=1 RESULT err=0 tag=105 nentries=0 etime=2
[23/Jun/2010:18:37:11 -0400] conn=12180 op=2 UNBIND
[23/Jun/2010:18:37:11 -0400] conn=12180 op=2 fd=118 closed - U1
[23/Jun/2010:18:37:11 -0400] conn=12181 fd=119 slot=119 connection from 138.125.205.65 to 138.125.205.65
[23/Jun/2010:18:37:11 -0400] conn=12181 op=0 BIND dn="cn=Directory Manager" method=128 version=3
[23/Jun/2010:18:37:11 -0400] conn=12181 op=0 RESULT err=0 tag=97 nentries=0 etime=0 dn="cn=tscei ldap directory manager"
[23/Jun/2010:18:37:11 -0400] conn=12181 op=1 ADD dn="cn=import_2010_6_23_18_37_12, cn=import, cn=tasks, cn=config"
[23/Jun/2010:18:37:11 -0400] conn=12181 op=1 RESULT err=1 tag=105 nentries=0 etime=0
[23/Jun/2010:18:37:11 -0400] conn=12181 op=2 UNBIND
Error Log
[23/Jun/2010:18:37:11 -0400] - WARNING: Import is running with nsslapd-db-private-import-mem on; No other process is allowed to access the database
[23/Jun/2010:18:37:11 -0400] - import userRoot: Beginning import job...
[23/Jun/2010:18:37:11 -0400] - ldbm: 'userRoot' is already in the middle of another task and cannot be disturbed.
[23/Jun/2010:18:37:11 -0400] - import userRoot: Index buffering enabled with bucket size 19
[23/Jun/2010:18:37:11 -0400] - import userRoot: Processing file "/home/chud/OLAY/LDAP_REPOPULATION_TEST/dit.ldif"
[23/Jun/2010:18:37:11 -0400] - import userRoot: Finished scanning file "/home/chud/OLAY/LDAP_REPOPULATION_TEST/dit.ldif" (97 entries)
[23/Jun/2010:18:37:12 -0400] - import userRoot: Workers finished; cleaning up...
[23/Jun/2010:18:37:12 -0400] - import userRoot: Workers cleaned up.
[23/Jun/2010:18:37:12 -0400] - import userRoot: Cleaning up producer thread...
[23/Jun/2010:18:37:12 -0400] - import userRoot: Indexing complete.* Post-processing...
[23/Jun/2010:18:37:12 -0400] - import userRoot: Flushing caches...
[23/Jun/2010:18:37:12 -0400] - import userRoot: Closing files...
[23/Jun/2010:18:37:12 -0400] - import userRoot: Import complete.* Processed 97 entries (91 entries were skipped because they don't belong to this database) in 1 seconds. (97.00 entries/sec)
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins@redhat.com> wrote:
Chun Tat David Chu wrote:
> Hi Rich,
>
> Thanks for helping. *I followed your direction and exported another
> LDIF for my 2nd database but whenever I try to load it I get an error
> message "ldap_add: Operations error".
What's in the errors log?
>
> Here's a little information on my DIT hierarchy.
> Database 1: dc=foo,dc=com
> Database 2: dc=new_foo,dc=foo,dc=com
>
> I ran the ldif2db.pl <http://ldif2db.pl> using the verbose switch and
> here's the output.
> ldapmodify: started Wed Jun 23 17:11:34 2010
>
> ldap_init( <hostname>, 389 )
> add objectclass:
> * * * * top
> * * * * extensibleObject
> add cn:
> * * * * import_2010_6_23_17_11_34
> add nsInstance:
> * * * * userRoot
> add nsFilename:
> * * * * /home/chud/OLAY/LDAP_REPOPULATION_TEST/second_dit.ldif
> add nsImportChunkSize:
> * * * * 0
> add nsUniqueIdGenerator:
> * * * * time
> adding new entry cn=import_2010_6_23_17_11_34, cn=import, cn=tasks,
> cn=config
> ldap_add: Operations error
>
> At this point, I am stuck. *Do you have any idea what went wrong? *The
> reload of the root database does work but when I reload the 2nd
> database that sits underneath in the root database in the DIT it
> doesn't work.
>
> Thanks in advance!
>
> - David
>
> On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 6:58 PM, Rich Megginson <rmeggins@redhat.com
> <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com>> wrote:
>
> * * Chun Tat David Chu wrote:
> * * > Thanks Rich,
> * * >
> * * > I did more experiment, and I noticed one of my database didn't get
> * * > reload after I ran ldif2db.pl <http://ldif2db.pl>
> * * <http://ldif2db.pl> script
> * * >
> * * > My DIT has a root database and then a sub database under the root
> * * > database. *When I did the export, I exported from the root database.
> * * > When I ran the ldif2db.pl <http://ldif2db.pl>
> * * <http://ldif2db.pl> script, only the root
> * * > database get reloaded but not the sub database.
> * * >
> * * > Do you have any ideas?
> * * Yes. *You need an LDIF for each database.
> * * >
> * * > Thanks in advance
> * * >
> * * > - David
> * * >
> * * > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 5:30 PM, Rich Megginson
> * * <rmeggins@redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com>
> * * > <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com>>> wrote:
> * * >
> * * > * * Chun Tat David Chu wrote:
> * * > * * > Hi Rich,
> * * > * * >
> * * > * * > I did some testing and it appears to be working as you
> * * expected.
> * * > * * > The steps involve
> * * > * * > 1) Export the directory database to a LDIF
> * * > * * > 2) Reload the directory database
> * * > * * > 3) Reinitialize the consumer
> * * > * * >
> * * > * * > I have another question. *I noticed there's an ACI on the
> * * directory
> * * > * * > database LDIF.
> * * > * * > aci: (targetattr = "*")(version 3.0; acl "SIE Group";
> * * allow (all)
> * * > * * > groupdn = "l
> * * > * * > *dap:///cn=slapd-foo, cn=Red Hat Directory Server, cn=Server
> * * > * * Group, cn=
> * * > * * > *foo.com <http://foo.com> <http://foo.com>
> * * <http://foo.com>, ou=tscei.dd-x.com <http://tscei.dd-x.com>
> * * > * * <http://tscei.dd-x.com> <http://tscei.dd-x.com>,
> * * > * * > o=NetscapeRoot"
> * * > * * >
> * * > * * > Do I need to modify the hostname in that ACI if I want to
> * * load the
> * * > * * > same directory database into another LDAP? *Essentially I want
> * * > * * to use
> * * > * * > a basic directory database LDIF and load it to a bunch of
> * * different
> * * > * * > development LDAP we have. *Some LDAPs are multi-mastered
> * * configured
> * * > * * > and most are not.
> * * > * * No, you do not need to change that hostname.
> * * > * * >
> * * > * * > Thanks in advance
> * * > * * >
> * * > * * > - David
> * * > * * >
> * * > * * > On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Rich Megginson
> * * > * * <rmeggins@redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com>
> * * <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com>>
> * * > * * > <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com>
> * * <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com>>>> wrote:
> * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * Chun Tat David Chu wrote:
> * * > * * > * * > Another question about directory re-population.
> * * > * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * > If I want to create a generic LDIF backup for a
> * * bunch of test
> * * > * * > * * > directory servers, in the exported LDIF file, should I
> * * > * * remove the
> * * > * * > * * > following attributes? or it doesn't really matter?
> * * > * * > * * > nsUniqueId: 795dca00-5fa011df-8de2866b-a65dc74a
> * * > * * > * * > creatorsName:
> * * > * * > * * > modifiersName: cn=directory manager
> * * > * * > * * > createTimestamp: 20100514213428Z
> * * > * * > * * > modifyTimestamp: 20100514213430Z
> * * > * * > * * I don't think it matters. *I suppose you might want to
> * * keep
> * * > * * > * * createTimestamp and modifyTimestamp just for your own
> * * > * * information.
> * * > * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * > My LDIF backup will be imported back to the LDAP using
> * * > * * > * * ldif2db.pl <http://ldif2db.pl> <http://ldif2db.pl>
> * * <http://ldif2db.pl>
> * * > * * > * * > <http://ldif2db.pl>.
> * * > * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * > - David
> * * > * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:40 PM, Chun Tat David Chu
> * * > * * > * * > <beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>
> * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>>
> * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>
> * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>
> * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>
> * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>>>>> wrote:
> * * > * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * Thanks Rich, I'll give that a try.
> * * > * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 4:20 PM, Rich Megginson
> * * > * * > * * > * * <rmeggins@redhat.com
> * * <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com> <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com
> * * <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com>>
> * * > * * <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com>
> * * <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com>>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com
> * * <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com> <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com
> * * <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com>>
> * * > * * <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com>
> * * <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com>>>>> wrote:
> * * > * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * Chun Tat David Chu wrote:
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > Hi Rich,
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > Thanks for replying.
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > Just making sure I'm using the right
> * * utility. *To
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * reinitialize the
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > directory, I use the ldif2db.pl
> * * <http://ldif2db.pl>
> * * > * * <http://ldif2db.pl> <http://ldif2db.pl>
> * * > * * > * * <http://ldif2db.pl>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * <http://ldif2db.pl> Perl script right?
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * Yes, if you need to restore _all_ servers
> * * from an LDIF
> * * > * * > * * backup.
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * *The
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * reason I say _all_ is that when you do a restore
> * * > * * from a
> * * > * * > * * "raw"
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * LDIF file,
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * this wipes out all of the replication state
> * * > * * information and
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * changelog
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * information. *This means you will have to
> * * use this
> * * > * * server to
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * re-init
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * other masters and consumers - (I mean
> * * re-init in the
> * * > * * > * * sense of
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * Initializing Consumers -
> * * > * * > * * >
> * * > * * >
> * * >
> * * http://www.redhat.com/docs/manuals/dir-server/8.1/admin/Managing_Replication-Initializing_Consumers.html)
> * * > * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * You can use db2ldif.pl <http://db2ldif.pl>
> * * <http://db2ldif.pl>
> * * > * * <http://db2ldif.pl>
> * * > * * > * * <http://db2ldif.pl> -r to create an
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * LDIF file suitable for offline
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * replica init
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > - David
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > On Fri, Jun 18, 2010 at 3:58 PM, Rich
> * * Megginson
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * <rmeggins@redhat.com
> * * <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com> <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com
> * * <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com>>
> * * > * * <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com>
> * * <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com>>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com
> * * <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com> <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com
> * * <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com>>
> * * > * * <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com>
> * * <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com>>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com
> * * <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com>
> * * > * * <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com
> * * <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com> <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com
> * * <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com>>>
> * * > * * <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com>
> * * <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com
> * * <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com> <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com
> * * <mailto:rmeggins@redhat.com>>>>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * wrote:
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * Chun Tat David Chu wrote:
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > Hi all,
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > I am hitting an issue with
> * * reinitializing the
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * directory database.
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > Basically I have two directory
> * * servers and
> * * > * * they're
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * configured using
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > multi-master replication scheme.
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > When I reinitialize the directory
> * * > * * database, the
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * directory became
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > inaccessible. *I think it is related
> * * with my
> * * > * * > * * multi-master
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * replication
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > setup because when I use only
> * * reinitialize
> * * > * * one LDAP,
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * it would work
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > just fine
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > My question is if multi-master
> * * replication is
> * * > * * > * * enabled
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * on two LDAPs
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > then do I need to reinitialize both
> * * LDAPs
> * * > * * at the
> * * > * * > * * same
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * time or
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * just one
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > LDAP?
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * If you use one master (m1) to re-init the
> * * > * * other master
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * (m2), you
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * do not
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * need to then use m2 to re-init m2.
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > Thanks!
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > - David
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 4:42 PM,
> * * Chun Tat
> * * > * * David Chu
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > <beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>
> * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>
> * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>
> * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>
> * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>
> * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>
> * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>
> * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>
> * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>>>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>
> * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>
> * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>
> * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>
> * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>
> * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>
> * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>
> * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>
> * * > * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com
> * * <mailto:beyonddc.storage@gmail.com>>>>>>> wrote:
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * Reinitializing the directory
> * * database
> * * > * * does the
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * trick! *I'm going
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * to do more testing on it.
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * Thanks a lot!
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * - David
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 1:43 PM,
> * * David
> * * > * * Boreham
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * <david_list@boreham.org
> * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org <mailto:david_list@boreham.org>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org
> * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org> <mailto:david_list@boreham.org
> * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org
> * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org <mailto:david_list@boreham.org>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org
> * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org
> * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org>>>> <mailto:david_list@boreham.org
> * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org <mailto:david_list@boreham.org>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org
> * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org> <mailto:david_list@boreham.org
> * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org
> * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org <mailto:david_list@boreham.org>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org
> * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org
> * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org>>>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org
> * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org <mailto:david_list@boreham.org>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org
> * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org> <mailto:david_list@boreham.org
> * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org
> * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org <mailto:david_list@boreham.org>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org
> * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org
> * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org>>>> <mailto:david_list@boreham.org
> * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org <mailto:david_list@boreham.org>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org
> * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org> <mailto:david_list@boreham.org
> * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org
> * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org <mailto:david_list@boreham.org>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org
> * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org
> * * <mailto:david_list@boreham.org>>>>>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * wrote:
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * * * On 5/14/2010 11:40 AM, Chun
> * * Tat David
> * * > * * > * * Chu wrote:
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * * * > We use 389 Directory as
> * * part of our
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * development lab.
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * *Every
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * * * time when
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * * * > we do a new test, we need to
> * * > * * > * * repopulate our 389
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * directory to
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * * * a clean
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * * * > slate (i.e. delete all
> * * existing
> * * > * * data and
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * re-create a base
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * * * hierarchy
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * * * > tree).
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * * * > Our current way of doing so is
> * * > * * simply
> * * > * * > * * using
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * the ldapdelete
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * * * command to
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * * * > remove all existing data
> * * and use
> * * > * * > * * ldapadd to
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * re-create
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * the base
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * * * > hierarchy tree. *This approach
> * * > * * is okay but
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * sometime it
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * could
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * * * take up
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * * * > to 20 to 30 minutes to
> * * delete all
> * * > * * > * * existing data
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * depending on the
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * * * > amount of data saved in the
> * * > * * directory.
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * * * > Is there a more efficient
> * * way to
> * * > * * > * * repopulate
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * the 389
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * Directory?
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * * * Yes. Import an almost empty
> * * LDIF file.
> * * > * * > * * You can
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * also copy the
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * * * on-disk
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * * * database underneath a server
> * * (when
> * * > * * it is
> * * > * * > * * shut
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * down), if you
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * * * know what
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * * * you're doing.
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * * * --
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > * * * * 389 users mailing list
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * >
> * * 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * >
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * >
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>>>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * >
> * * > * * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * >
> * * > * * > * * >
> * * > * * >
> * * >
> * * ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > --
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > 389 users mailing list
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * > 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * >
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * --
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * 389 users mailing list
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > * * 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * >
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * >
> * * > * * > * * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * >
> * * > * * > * * >
> * * > * * >
> * * >
> * * ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > --
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > 389 users mailing list
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * > 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * >
> * * > * * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> * * > * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * --
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * 389 users mailing list
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>>
> * * > * * > * * > * * * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>>>
> * * > * * > * * >
> * * > * * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> * * > * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * >
> * * > * * >
> * * >
> * * ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> * * > * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * > --
> * * > * * > * * > 389 users mailing list
> * * > * * > * * > 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>>
> * * > * * > * * >
> * * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> * * > * * >
> * * > * * > * * --
> * * > * * > * * 389 users mailing list
> * * > * * > * * 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> * * > * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>>
> * * > * * > * * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> * * > * * >
> * * > * * >
> * * > * * >
> * * >
> * * ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> * * > * * >
> * * > * * > --
> * * > * * > 389 users mailing list
> * * > * * > 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> * * > * * > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> * * >
> * * > * * --
> * * > * * 389 users mailing list
> * * > * * 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>>
> * * > * * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
> * * >
> * * >
> * * >
> * * ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> * * >
> * * > --
> * * > 389 users mailing list
> * * > 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>
> * * --
> * * 389 users mailing list
> * * 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> * * <mailto:389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org>
> * * https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
--
389 users mailing list
389-users@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-users
Directory Re-population
