FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 05-25-2008, 08:47 PM
sean darcy
 
Default 2.6.26-0.25.rc3.git4 or VirtualBox ?

I'm using VirtualBox to run rawhide.

kernel-2.6.26-0.25.rc3.git4.fc10.i686 locks up hard with:

unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000246

2.6.25.3-18 works fine.

Does anyone else see this, or is it VirtualBox?

sean

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 05-25-2008, 10:27 PM
David Boles
 
Default 2.6.26-0.25.rc3.git4 or VirtualBox ?

sean darcy wrote:

I'm using VirtualBox to run rawhide.

kernel-2.6.26-0.25.rc3.git4.fc10.i686 locks up hard with:

unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000246

2.6.25.3-18 works fine.

Does anyone else see this, or is it VirtualBox?

sean




I see what is probably the same thing.

--


David

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 05-25-2008, 10:46 PM
Arjan van de Ven
 
Default 2.6.26-0.25.rc3.git4 or VirtualBox ?

On Sun, 25 May 2008 16:47:39 -0400
sean darcy <seandarcy2@gmail.com> wrote:

> I'm using VirtualBox to run rawhide.
>
> kernel-2.6.26-0.25.rc3.git4.fc10.i686 locks up hard with:
>
> unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000246
>
> 2.6.25.3-18 works fine.

I wouldn't call it "fine";
VirtualBox is one of the top causes of kernel oopses that we're seeing
on Linux right now... I'm not surprised it's not working well with
2.6.26 either.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 05-25-2008, 11:36 PM
"Pavel Shevchuk"
 
Default 2.6.26-0.25.rc3.git4 or VirtualBox ?

After Sun bought Innotek i can't wait for xen dom0 kernel availability
in fedora9. For me vbox is dead =(


On 5/25/08, sean darcy <seandarcy2@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm using VirtualBox to run rawhide.
>
> kernel-2.6.26-0.25.rc3.git4.fc10.i686 locks up hard with:
>
> unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000246
>
> 2.6.25.3-18 works fine.
>
> Does anyone else see this, or is it VirtualBox?
>
> sean
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>


--
http://scwlab.com

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 05-26-2008, 01:26 AM
sean darcy
 
Default 2.6.26-0.25.rc3.git4 or VirtualBox ?

Arjan van de Ven wrote:

On Sun, 25 May 2008 16:47:39 -0400
sean darcy <seandarcy2@gmail.com> wrote:


I'm using VirtualBox to run rawhide.

kernel-2.6.26-0.25.rc3.git4.fc10.i686 locks up hard with:

unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000246

2.6.25.3-18 works fine.


I wouldn't call it "fine";
VirtualBox is one of the top causes of kernel oopses that we're seeing
on Linux right now... I'm not surprised it's not working well with
2.6.26 either.



"fine" means it WFM. It does all I ask.

I'm certainly not a vbox fanatic. In fact, I've only been using it for a
couple of days. That's why I posted: is this a vbox problem, or a kernel
issue.


If no one else is seeing a hard lockup on bare metal, then it's vbox.
AFAICS from the response, 1 guy sees the same lockup on bare metal, 2
don't like vbox.


sean

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 05-26-2008, 01:35 AM
"孙宗君"
 
Default 2.6.26-0.25.rc3.git4 or VirtualBox ?

Hi, sean

I am not an expert on Virtual box or kernel, but I know
kernel-2.6.26-0.25.rc3.git4.fc10.i686 is for F10, I use virtualbox
1.6.0 on Fedora 9, it works fine realy. AFAIK virtual box only
supports Fedora9 or older Fedora series now. F10 is not in the scope
of consideration now since its Alpha version is not ready now.

Thanks

Zongjun

2008/5/26 sean darcy <seandarcy2@gmail.com>:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, 25 May 2008 16:47:39 -0400
>> sean darcy <seandarcy2@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm using VirtualBox to run rawhide.
>>>
>>> kernel-2.6.26-0.25.rc3.git4.fc10.i686 locks up hard with:
>>>
>>> unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000246
>>>
>>> 2.6.25.3-18 works fine.
>>
>> I wouldn't call it "fine";
>> VirtualBox is one of the top causes of kernel oopses that we're seeing
>> on Linux right now... I'm not surprised it's not working well with
>> 2.6.26 either.
>>
>
> "fine" means it WFM. It does all I ask.
>
> I'm certainly not a vbox fanatic. In fact, I've only been using it for a
> couple of days. That's why I posted: is this a vbox problem, or a kernel
> issue.
>
> If no one else is seeing a hard lockup on bare metal, then it's vbox. AFAICS
> from the response, 1 guy sees the same lockup on bare metal, 2 don't like
> vbox.
>
> sean
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 05-26-2008, 06:29 AM
Arjan van de Ven
 
Default 2.6.26-0.25.rc3.git4 or VirtualBox ?

On Sun, 25 May 2008 21:26:09 -0400
sean darcy <seandarcy2@gmail.com> wrote:

> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > On Sun, 25 May 2008 16:47:39 -0400
> > sean darcy <seandarcy2@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I'm using VirtualBox to run rawhide.
> >>
> >> kernel-2.6.26-0.25.rc3.git4.fc10.i686 locks up hard with:
> >>
> >> unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000246
> >>
> >> 2.6.25.3-18 works fine.
> >
> > I wouldn't call it "fine";
> > VirtualBox is one of the top causes of kernel oopses that we're
> > seeing on Linux right now... I'm not surprised it's not working
> > well with 2.6.26 either.
> >
>
> "fine" means it WFM. It does all I ask.
>
> I'm certainly not a vbox fanatic. In fact, I've only been using it
> for a couple of days. That's why I posted: is this a vbox problem, or
> a kernel issue.

you're probably seeing:

http://www.kerneloops.org/search.php?search=g_abExecMemory

which a lot of other folks are seeing, so much so that this is in the
top 15 of all kernel oopses/warnings reported in the last week.

Given the backtrace and the high frequency of this thing, I'm pretty
sure it's a VirtualBox bug.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 06:14 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org