FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 05-22-2008, 04:52 AM
Mamoru Tasaka
 
Default rpms/csound/devel csound.spec,1.14,1.15

Seth Vidal (skvidal) wrote, at 05/22/2008 01:21 PM +9:00:
> Author: skvidal
>
> Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/csound/devel
> In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv18916
>
> Modified Files:
> csound.spec
> Log Message:
> licensing tag fix
>
>
>
>
> Index: csound.spec
> ================================================== =================
> RCS file: /cvs/pkgs/rpms/csound/devel/csound.spec,v
> retrieving revision 1.14
> retrieving revision 1.15
> diff -u -r1.14 -r1.15
> --- csound.spec 1 Feb 2008 16:29:00 -0000 1.14
> +++ csound.spec 22 May 2008 04:20:59 -0000 1.15
> @@ -13,9 +13,9 @@
> Summary: Csound - sound synthesis language and library
> Name: csound
> Version: 5.03.0
> -Release: 16%{?dist}
> +Release: 17%{?dist}
> URL: http://csound.sourceforge.net/
> -License: LGPL
> +License: LGPLv2+
> Group: Applications/Multimedia
>
> BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
> @@ -419,6 +419,9 @@
> %doc tutorial/*.py
>
> %changelog
> +* Thu May 22 2008 Seth Vidal <skvidal at fedoraproject.org> - 5.03.0-17
> +- license tag fix
> +
> * Fri Feb 1 2008 Dan Williams <dcbw@redhat.com> - 5.03.0-16
> - Fix default plugin path on 64-bit platforms (rh #407911)
> - Fix file conflicts with other packages (rh #210215)

Well, actually the license of csound is a bit problematic.
See my comment on
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597#c8

Regards,
Mamoru

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 05-22-2008, 12:27 PM
seth vidal
 
Default rpms/csound/devel csound.spec,1.14,1.15

On Thu, 2008-05-22 at 13:52 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote:

> Well, actually the license of csound is a bit problematic.
> See my comment on
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440597#c8

>From the way I read it the license should be LGPLv2+ byt the
readme-csound5.txt file. You're right about some files needing to be
pulled out of it, though.

-sv


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 04:31 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org