I've just got a couple of e-mails stating that two of my packages have
broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
deltarpm-3.4-10.fc9.ppc requires /usr/bin/perl
On x86_64:
deltarpm-3.4-10.fc9.x86_64 requires /usr/bin/perl
On i386:
deltarpm-3.4-10.fc9.i386 requires /usr/bin/perl
On ppc64:
deltarpm-3.4-10.fc9.ppc64 requires /usr/bin/perl
On ppc:
presto-utils-0.3.2-1.fc8.noarch requires /bin/sh
presto-utils-0.3.2-1.fc8.noarch requires /usr/bin/python
On x86_64:
presto-utils-0.3.2-1.fc8.noarch requires /bin/sh
presto-utils-0.3.2-1.fc8.noarch requires /usr/bin/python
On i386:
presto-utils-0.3.2-1.fc8.noarch requires /bin/sh
presto-utils-0.3.2-1.fc8.noarch requires /usr/bin/python
On ppc64:
presto-utils-0.3.2-1.fc8.noarch requires /bin/sh
presto-utils-0.3.2-1.fc8.noarch requires /usr/bin/python
This is just fuzz and I can ignore it, right?
Jonathan
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
05-17-2008, 10:19 AM
Rahul Sundaram
Broken dependencies in Rawhide
Jonathan Dieter wrote:
I've just got a couple of e-mails stating that two of my packages have
broken dependencies in the development tree:
This is just fuzz and I can ignore it, right?
Seems to be just a side effect of breakage from the latest glibc update
in rawhide. Should be safe to ignore IIUC.
Rahul
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
05-17-2008, 10:19 AM
"Peter Lemenkov"
Broken dependencies in Rawhide
Hello All!
2008/5/17 Jonathan Dieter <jdieter@gmail.com>:
> I've just got a couple of e-mails stating that two of my packages have
The same for me.
--
With best regards!
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
05-17-2008, 10:20 AM
pingou
Broken dependencies in Rawhide
Jonathan Dieter wrote:
I've just got a couple of e-mails stating that two of my packages have
broken dependencies in the development tree:
This is just fuzz and I can ignore it, right?
I got them about /bin/sh /sbin/ldconfig, so I guess we can ignore them...
Cheers
Pierre
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list