FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 05-17-2008, 10:16 AM
Jonathan Dieter
 
Default Broken dependencies in Rawhide

I've just got a couple of e-mails stating that two of my packages have
broken dependencies in the development tree:
On ppc:
deltarpm-3.4-10.fc9.ppc requires /usr/bin/perl
On x86_64:
deltarpm-3.4-10.fc9.x86_64 requires /usr/bin/perl
On i386:
deltarpm-3.4-10.fc9.i386 requires /usr/bin/perl
On ppc64:
deltarpm-3.4-10.fc9.ppc64 requires /usr/bin/perl
On ppc:
presto-utils-0.3.2-1.fc8.noarch requires /bin/sh
presto-utils-0.3.2-1.fc8.noarch requires /usr/bin/python
On x86_64:
presto-utils-0.3.2-1.fc8.noarch requires /bin/sh
presto-utils-0.3.2-1.fc8.noarch requires /usr/bin/python
On i386:
presto-utils-0.3.2-1.fc8.noarch requires /bin/sh
presto-utils-0.3.2-1.fc8.noarch requires /usr/bin/python
On ppc64:
presto-utils-0.3.2-1.fc8.noarch requires /bin/sh
presto-utils-0.3.2-1.fc8.noarch requires /usr/bin/python

This is just fuzz and I can ignore it, right?

Jonathan
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 05-17-2008, 10:19 AM
Rahul Sundaram
 
Default Broken dependencies in Rawhide

Jonathan Dieter wrote:

I've just got a couple of e-mails stating that two of my packages have
broken dependencies in the development tree:




This is just fuzz and I can ignore it, right?


Seems to be just a side effect of breakage from the latest glibc update
in rawhide. Should be safe to ignore IIUC.


Rahul

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 05-17-2008, 10:19 AM
"Peter Lemenkov"
 
Default Broken dependencies in Rawhide

Hello All!

2008/5/17 Jonathan Dieter <jdieter@gmail.com>:
> I've just got a couple of e-mails stating that two of my packages have

The same for me.

--
With best regards!

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 05-17-2008, 10:20 AM
pingou
 
Default Broken dependencies in Rawhide

Jonathan Dieter wrote:

I've just got a couple of e-mails stating that two of my packages have
broken dependencies in the development tree:
This is just fuzz and I can ignore it, right?


I got them about /bin/sh /sbin/ldconfig, so I guess we can ignore them...

Cheers

Pierre

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 09:39 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org