On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 01:49 +0300, Pavel Shevchuk wrote:
> swfdec depends on less gnome-libs, and at least for me it works much
> better than gnash. It also has very nice "click to enable" feature
How did you get it to even work? For me, with gstreamer -good -bad -ugly
and -ffmpeg, doesn't work at all. With the same setup, gnash at least
works in some cases (youtube for instance).
I'd rather just use Adblock/NoScripts to block such content on sites I
don't want to display. This way, it also collapses the given flash
Further, swfdec-mozilla depends swfdec-gtk, whereas I don't see any
Gnome related deps for gnash...
> On 5/15/08, Francis Earl <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> > Are there any technical reasons as to why Fedora seems to prefer SWFdec
> > over Gnash?
> > I understand that to be part of the Gnome Developer Platform, your
> > project must be LGPL, which Gnash is not, but Gnash actually works today
> > for the more popular use cases (YouTube and friends) and seems to be
> > implemented in a far better way (OpenGL etc) ...
> > Also, wrt to gcjwebplugin, is there any way to make games like
> > games.yahoo.com/pl work? I am sort of addicted to that game, but I'd
> > rather not install the proprietary plugin.
> > Thank you for any assistance, or feedback
> > --
> > fedora-devel-list mailing list
> > email@example.com
> > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
fedora-devel-list mailing list