Hi,

Getting ikvm to build is proving to be a hideous problem.

1. classpath needs to be rebuilt
2. ecj needs to be built with ikvm

The only reason for this is that there is one dll required which is
prebuilt.

Given the amount of problems this one dll will cause, can ikvm be given
special consideration and be allowed the dll? It is not causing problems
on my x86 or x86_64 boxes.

TTFN

Paul
--
Sie können mich aufreizen und wirklich heiß machen!

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Paul wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Getting ikvm to build is proving to be a hideous problem.
>
> 1. classpath needs to be rebuilt


I don't get it. Building classpath requires java-devel, which is a
standard part of Fedora.

> 2. ecj needs to be built with ikvm

Err, why? ecj is also a standard prt of Fedora.

Andrew.


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Hi,

> > Getting ikvm to build is proving to be a hideous problem.
> >
> > 1. classpath needs to be rebuilt
>
>
> I don't get it. Building classpath requires java-devel, which is a
> standard part of Fedora.

Yep - I know that. ikvm builds classpath for itself. That really isn't a
problem, the tarball can be extracted within the ikvm directories and
the script fiddled with. It does add almost 10Mb to the src.rpm size

> > 2. ecj needs to be built with ikvm
>
> Err, why? ecj is also a standard prt of Fedora.

To build part of ikvm, ecj is rebuilt by ikvm which means another
package being brought in to build a 80k dll!

TTFN

Paul
--
Sie können mich aufreizen und wirklich heiß machen!

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Paul wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> Getting ikvm to build is proving to be a hideous problem.
>>>
>>> 1. classpath needs to be rebuilt
>>
>> I don't get it. Building classpath requires java-devel, which is a
>> standard part of Fedora.
>
> Yep - I know that. ikvm builds classpath for itself. That really isn't a
> problem, the tarball can be extracted within the ikvm directories and
> the script fiddled with. It does add almost 10Mb to the src.rpm size

Ok.

>>> 2. ecj needs to be built with ikvm
>> Err, why? ecj is also a standard prt of Fedora.
>
> To build part of ikvm, ecj is rebuilt by ikvm which means another
> package being brought in to build a 80k dll!

OK, so what are you complaining about? What is this hideous problem?
Doesn't seem there is any problem at all.

Andrew.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Le lundi 12 mai 2008 à 15:36 +0100, Paul a écrit :

> > > 2. ecj needs to be built with ikvm
> >
> > Err, why? ecj is also a standard prt of Fedora.
>
> To build part of ikvm, ecj is rebuilt by ikvm which means another
> package being brought in to build a 80k dll!

That's the free software way, sorry Same rule for everyone. Be sure
to relay all your issues to ikvm upstream so it fixes its build options

--
Nicolas Mailhot
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list