Am Montag, den 05.05.2008, 12:22 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
> Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > what about gnomebaker instead of brasero? This should remove
> > dependencies on nautilus-burn and gnome-mount and afacs the applications
> > works fine and does everything we need. It still requires gconf and some
> > other gnome stuff, but us will save us some more space.
> >
> > Opinions?
>
> I am not so sure about changing the default of a fairly crucial program
> this late. I haven't done any testing with gnomebaker. Perhaps you can
> post to fedora-devel list and gather some opinions?

That's what I did with this mail. Opinions anyone?
>
> Rahul

Christoph

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: XFCE Spin: gnomebaker instead of brasero?
From: Christoph Wickert <christoph.wickert@googlemail.com>
To: fedora-devel-list <fedora-devel-list@redhat.com>
Date: 05/05/2008 05:12 AM


Am Montag, den 05.05.2008, 12:22 +0530 schrieb Rahul Sundaram:

That's what I did with this mail. Opinions anyone?


I have used gnomebaker in association with XFCE for a few years. It's
been "OK" but if I have to do any serious burning I have to use K3b.
Mainly I cannot burn DVD-Video DVDs unless they are already in ISO format.


Otherwise gnomebaker is a good program. I use it at my workplace to burn
CDs for our updated software for customers. We've never encountered a
problem.




Christoph



--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list