Fixing recursive fault but reboot is needed!
 

Does this mean anything? Just popped up!

[root@localhost ~]# dmesg | tail
[<ffffffff812906c8>] ? thread_return+0x63/0xa7
[<ffffffff8106d214>] ? audit_syscall_exit+0x331/0x353
[<ffffffff812924e9>] error_exit+0x0/0x51


Code: 48 ff c9 eb 62 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 65 4c 8b 04 25 10 00 00 00 49
81 e8 d8 1f 00 00 48 83 c1 03 72 0f 49 3b 48 20 73 09 48 83 e9 03 <89>
11 31 c0 c3 48 83 e9 03 eb 31 0f 1f 44 00 00 65 4c 8b 04 25
RIP [<ffffffff811326a0>] __put_user_4+0x20/0x30
RSP <ffff810071dcbcd0>
---[ end trace ef51479770fd9cdc ]---
Fixing recursive fault but reboot is needed!
[root@localhost ~]#


--
projecthuh.com
All of my bits are free, are yours? Fedoraproject.org

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Fixing recursive fault but reboot is needed!
 

On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 06:49:26PM -0400, Dr. Diesel wrote:
> Does this mean anything?

yes, bad voodoo.

> [root@localhost ~]# dmesg | tail

please file a bugzilla with the full dmesg output.
(unless you're using any binary-only modules, in which case
all bets are off)

thanks,

Dave

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Fixing recursive fault but reboot is needed!
 

On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 06:49:26PM -0400, Dr. Diesel wrote:
> > Does this mean anything?
>
> yes, bad voodoo.
>
> > [root@localhost ~]# dmesg | tail
>
> please file a bugzilla with the full dmesg output.
> (unless you're using any binary-only modules, in which case
> all bets are off)
>
> thanks,
>
> Dave

No binary modules. Today's Rawhide.

Wait a minute, I did just install VirtualBox 1.6 not long before?
Which has a kernel module...

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445049

Thanks
Andy


--
projecthuh.com
All of my bits are free, are yours? Fedoraproject.org

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Fixing recursive fault but reboot is needed!
 

On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 07:01:53PM -0400, Dr. Diesel wrote:
> On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 06:49:26PM -0400, Dr. Diesel wrote:
> > > Does this mean anything?
> >
> > yes, bad voodoo.
> >
> > > [root@localhost ~]# dmesg | tail
> >
> > please file a bugzilla with the full dmesg output.
> > (unless you're using any binary-only modules, in which case
> > all bets are off)
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > Dave
>
> No binary modules. Today's Rawhide.
>
> Wait a minute, I did just install VirtualBox 1.6 not long before?
> Which has a kernel module...

Which does all sorts of futzing with page tables.
Chances are it can't cope with the changes done in .25 to support PAT.
(Though I've seen it cause numerous cases of corruption in even
before these changes).

If I were a betting man, I'd put odds on that module being the cause
of your problems.

Dave

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Fixing recursive fault but reboot is needed!
 

On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 07:01:53PM -0400, Dr. Diesel wrote:
> > On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 6:52 PM, Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> wrote:
> > > On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 06:49:26PM -0400, Dr. Diesel wrote:
> > > > Does this mean anything?
> > >
> > > yes, bad voodoo.
> > >
> > > > [root@localhost ~]# dmesg | tail
> > >
> > > please file a bugzilla with the full dmesg output.
> > > (unless you're using any binary-only modules, in which case
> > > all bets are off)
> > >
> > > thanks,
> > >
> > > Dave
> >
> > No binary modules. Today's Rawhide.
> >
> > Wait a minute, I did just install VirtualBox 1.6 not long before?
> > Which has a kernel module...
>
> Which does all sorts of futzing with page tables.
> Chances are it can't cope with the changes done in .25 to support PAT.
> (Though I've seen it cause numerous cases of corruption in even
> before these changes).
>
> If I were a betting man, I'd put odds on that module being the cause
> of your problems.
>
>
>
> Dave
>

According to their change log here http://virtualbox.org/wiki/Changelog

Linux additions: compatibility fixes with Linux 2.6.25

Give the word and I'll post a bug to them.

Thanks
Andy





--
projecthuh.com
All of my bits are free, are yours? Fedoraproject.org

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list