On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 15:33 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 16:31 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Roland McGrath (roland@redhat.com) said:
> > > In past versions, I've always found autofs was installed by default, so
> > > /net/foo/bar works out of the box on the first boot of a new install. I
> > > just installed f9 (yesterday's rawhide) with a completely vanilla x86_64
> > > install (minimal set of clicks, default package sets) and it was not there.
> > > What gives?
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427223
>
> -ENOACCESS. Summarize for mortals please.
>
> josh
>
I couldn't clear all the flags, but I made it so that Fedora
contributors could see it.
--
Jesse Keating RHCE (jkeating.livejournal.com)
Fedora Project (fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating)
GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
05-01-2008, 09:00 PM
Jesse Keating
autofs no longer in default install
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 13:54 -0700, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Is it in the release notes? It can be listed under "gratuitous major
> aggravations". I guess there isn't a way without a million extra clicks to
> ask for it at install time. Another five magic commands to type after
> every new install before anything works right. Joy oh joy.
Perhaps the default Fedora install isn't really designed for your use
case.
--
Jesse Keating RHCE (jkeating.livejournal.com)
Fedora Project (fedoraproject.org/wiki/JesseKeating)
GPG Public Key (geek.j2solutions.net/jkeating.j2solutions.pub)
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
05-02-2008, 08:31 PM
Bill Nottingham
autofs no longer in default install
Roland McGrath (roland@redhat.com) said:
> In past versions, I've always found autofs was installed by default, so
> /net/foo/bar works out of the box on the first boot of a new install. I
> just installed f9 (yesterday's rawhide) with a completely vanilla x86_64
> install (minimal set of clicks, default package sets) and it was not there.
> What gives?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
05-02-2008, 08:33 PM
Josh Boyer
autofs no longer in default install
On Fri, 2008-05-02 at 16:31 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Roland McGrath (roland@redhat.com) said:
> > In past versions, I've always found autofs was installed by default, so
> > /net/foo/bar works out of the box on the first boot of a new install. I
> > just installed f9 (yesterday's rawhide) with a completely vanilla x86_64
> > install (minimal set of clicks, default package sets) and it was not there.
> > What gives?
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427223
-ENOACCESS. Summarize for mortals please.
josh
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
05-02-2008, 08:54 PM
Roland McGrath
autofs no longer in default install
Is it in the release notes? It can be listed under "gratuitous major
aggravations". I guess there isn't a way without a million extra clicks to
ask for it at install time. Another five magic commands to type after
every new install before anything works right. Joy oh joy.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
05-02-2008, 09:06 PM
"Jeff Spaleta"
autofs no longer in default install
2008/5/1 Jesse Keating <jkeating@j2solutions.net>:
> Perhaps the default Fedora install isn't really designed for your use
> case.
Man i really wish we had a collection of pre-cooked kickstart files
aimed at specific use case. I have this gut feeling that if people
with similar server needs got together they could agree on a small
finite set of kickstart offerings that helped several easily defined
setups.
-jef
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list