Hi,

I've this small game I would like to have reviewed:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442022

Its a nice and simple review, anyone want to swap?

Regards,

Hans

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

On Thu, 2008-05-01 at 12:32 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've this small game I would like to have reviewed:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442022
>
> Its a nice and simple review, anyone want to swap?

I don't have anything awaiting review, but I wouldn't mind reviewing it.
Just a heads up that this will be the first package I've reviewed
(somehow I managed to get yum-presto reviewed without reviewing
something else first).

Jonathan
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 12:32:38PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> I've this small game I would like to have reviewed:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442022
>
> Its a nice and simple review, anyone want to swap?

Looks like someone took that one, but I have these to swap with
anyone, with the most important ones (to me) listed first:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442705 (pa_bitmatch)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442871 (virt-top)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443449 (udpcast)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442873 (virt-df, requires 442705)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443449 (ocaml-pgocaml)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=444428 (cmigrep)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435431 (ocaml-deriving)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=442875 (virt-ctrl)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435299 (ocaml-pa-monad)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=435287 (ocaml-json-static)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=434707 (ocaml-sexplib)

If you want me to take some reviews in return, let me know.

Rich.

--
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-p2v converts physical machines to virtual machines. Boot with a
live CD or over the network (PXE) and turn machines into Xen guests.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-p2v

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 6:49 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=443449 (udpcast)

I can take this one. Would you mind reviewing one of these?

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=262401 (jcip-annotations)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=285551 (idw-gpl)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436033 (mona)

The first one is a VERY small package, so it should be easy. If
anyone is interested in findbugs (http://findbugs.sourceforge.net/),
the first two are prerequisites for it.
--
Jerry James
http://loganjerry.googlepages.com/

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 08:41:28AM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=262401 (jcip-annotations)
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436033 (mona)

OK I grabbed the two above.

I'll do them by tomorrow morning.

Rich.

--
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
virt-top is 'top' for virtual machines. Tiny program with many
powerful monitoring features, net stats, disk stats, logging, etc.
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/virt-top

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

On Thu, May 1, 2008 at 9:17 AM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 01, 2008 at 08:41:28AM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=262401 (jcip-annotations)
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436033 (mona)
>
> OK I grabbed the two above.
>
> I'll do them by tomorrow morning.

You took two, and I only took one. Now I feel guilty....
--
Jerry James, wallowing in guilt
http://loganjerry.googlepages.com/

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Hi All,

I've got a few packages which I would like to have reviewed:
lwp - LWP thread library - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446650
rvm - RVM library - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446651
rpc2 - RPC2 library - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446652
coda - Coda distributed file system -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446653
vegastrike-music - Music for Vega Strike -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445847


All pretty easies straightforward reviews and I would be happy to review any
package of yours in return.


Regards,

Hans

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 17:00 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
> coda - Coda distributed file system -
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446653

What the current status on Coda? I remember looking into it years ago
when I was trying to find a good distributed filesystem and it seemed to
be pretty dead. Is it living again?

Jonathan
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

> Hi All,
>
> I've got a few packages which I would like to have reviewed:
> lwp - LWP thread library -
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446650
> rvm - RVM library - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446651
> rpc2 - RPC2 library - https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446652
> coda - Coda distributed file system -
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446653
> vegastrike-music - Music for Vega Strike -
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=445847

I'll take vegastrike-music if you take inksmoto:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=438156

> All pretty easies straightforward reviews and I would be happy to review
> any
> package of yours in return.
>
> Regards,
>
> Hans
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>


--
novus ordo absurdum

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Jonathan Dieter wrote:

On Thu, 2008-05-15 at 17:00 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
coda - Coda distributed file system -
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=446653


What the current status on Coda? I remember looking into it years ago
when I was trying to find a good distributed filesystem and it seemed to
be pretty dead. Is it living again?



I'm using coda for some distributed filesystems lab exercises at the university
where I teach, so I'ven't really stressed it in anyway, but it seems to work
well and yes coda seems very alive, the 6.9.3 release which I've packaged is
from 11-Jan-2008 and there is a 6.9.4-rc2 release from 10-Apr-2008.


Regards,

Hans

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list