Does anyone know why there are three versions for 'unison' in bugzilla?
-unison
-unison213
-unison227

This seems very inconsistent with most of the other components there.
Can we just go back to one?


Also... I have unison-2.13.16-3.fc6.i386 installed and when I 'yum
update' it wants to install both of these:

---> Package unison227.x86_64 0:2.27.57-8.fc9 set to be updated
---> Package unison213.x86_64 0:2.13.16-10.fc9 set to be updated

Bug or feature?

John

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: three unison versions in bugzilla and strange update
From: John Poelstra <poelstra@redhat.com>
To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list@redhat.com>
Date: 04/24/2008 11:43 AM


Does anyone know why there are three versions for 'unison' in bugzilla?
-unison
-unison213
-unison227

This seems very inconsistent with most of the other components there.
Can we just go back to one?


Also... I have unison-2.13.16-3.fc6.i386 installed and when I 'yum
update' it wants to install both of these:

---> Package unison227.x86_64 0:2.27.57-8.fc9 set to be updated
---> Package unison213.x86_64 0:2.13.16-10.fc9 set to be updated

Bug or feature?

John



This came up on the list just last week.

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-April/msg01229.html

Regards,
Mike

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Mike Cronenworth said the following on 04/24/2008 09:46 AM Pacific Time:

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: three unison versions in bugzilla and strange update
From: John Poelstra <poelstra@redhat.com>
To: Development discussions related to Fedora
<fedora-devel-list@redhat.com>

Date: 04/24/2008 11:43 AM


Does anyone know why there are three versions for 'unison' in bugzilla?
-unison
-unison213
-unison227

This seems very inconsistent with most of the other components there.
Can we just go back to one?


Also... I have unison-2.13.16-3.fc6.i386 installed and when I 'yum
update' it wants to install both of these:

---> Package unison227.x86_64 0:2.27.57-8.fc9 set to be updated
---> Package unison213.x86_64 0:2.13.16-10.fc9 set to be updated

Bug or feature?

John



This came up on the list just last week.

https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-April/msg01229.html

Regards,
Mike



Oops. Sorry, I missed that thread.

What about the three components in bugzilla?

John

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

John Poelstra wrote:

Oops. Sorry, I missed that thread.

What about the three components in bugzilla?

John

Three separate packages, thus three components. We have the same for
other compat type packages.


-Toshio

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

On Thu, April 24, 2008 11:55 am, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> John Poelstra wrote:
>> What about the three components in bugzilla?
>
> Three separate packages, thus three components. We have the same for
> other compat type packages.

The original unison package has been completely replaced by unison213 and
unison227 in all currently shipping distro versions (of Fedora/EPEL).

It'd therefore be nice if the old unison component in Bugzilla could go
away. Of course, I have no idea if that's possible, or if it'd break any
existing bug reports.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Stephen Warren wrote:


The original unison package has been completely replaced by unison213 and
unison227 in all currently shipping distro versions (of Fedora/EPEL).

It'd therefore be nice if the old unison component in Bugzilla could go
away. Of course, I have no idea if that's possible, or if it'd break any
existing bug reports.



You'll need to open a report in bugzilla for this so that the bugzilla
admins can make the change. In addition, all existing reports (I'm
pretty sure, open or closed) would need to be moved to another component.


-Toshio

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

On Thu, April 24, 2008 1:29 pm, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Stephen Warren wrote:
>> It'd therefore be nice if the old unison component in Bugzilla could go
>> away. Of course, I have no idea if that's possible, or if it'd break any
>> existing bug reports.
>
> You'll need to open a report in bugzilla for this so that the bugzilla
> admins can make the change. In addition, all existing reports (I'm
> pretty sure, open or closed) would need to be moved to another component.

OK. What component do I file this bug report against? Presumably not
bugzilla, because that's for the development of bugzilla code, not the
configuration as deployed on the website?

Thanks.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

Stephen Warren wrote:

On Thu, April 24, 2008 1:29 pm, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:

Stephen Warren wrote:

It'd therefore be nice if the old unison component in Bugzilla could go
away. Of course, I have no idea if that's possible, or if it'd break any
existing bug reports.

You'll need to open a report in bugzilla for this so that the bugzilla
admins can make the change. In addition, all existing reports (I'm
pretty sure, open or closed) would need to be moved to another component.


OK. What component do I file this bug report against? Presumably not
bugzilla, because that's for the development of bugzilla code, not the
configuration as deployed on the website?


Here's a bug you can use as an example:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=377631


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list