minimal install
On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 03:24:09PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > Total download size: 94 M > > > Installed size: 401 M > > Of which one quarter is the kernel and the other quarter is glibc locale > > support, right? > Or more: > 122659574 kernel > 117821428 glibc-common > 35623360 linux-firmware > 14233540 coreutils > 13845828 glibc So, if a minimal image is a very high priority, this could be shrunk. Handwaving aside the difficulty for a moment, if the default kernel split out some of the drivers, maybe that could get down to 60MB. Leave out linux-firmware.... And glibc-common is almost _entirely_ locale and i18n. Because we still want to be _Fedora_, not a tiny-linux distro, let's leave coreutils and glibc as-is. Still, though, we've shaved off 200+ MB. With this, the three versions of "minimal" you give come down to about: @core + kernel: 300MB systemd [...] yum: 240MB 20% savings systemd + not yum: 195M 35% savings Chew away at the dependencies and at the size of some of the other packages (python 2to3, I'm looking at you), and we could get the middle option down below 200MB. -- Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm@fedoraproject.org> -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel |
minimal install
Am 15.10.2012 21:47, schrieb Matthew Miller:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 03:24:09PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: >>>> Total download size: 94 M >>>> Installed size: 401 M >>> Of which one quarter is the kernel and the other quarter is glibc locale >>> support, right? >> Or more: >> 122659574 kernel >> 117821428 glibc-common >> 35623360 linux-firmware >> 14233540 coreutils >> 13845828 glibc > > So, if a minimal image is a very high priority, this could be shrunk. > Handwaving aside the difficulty for a moment, if the default kernel split > out some of the drivers, maybe that could get down to 60MB. Leave out > linux-firmware.... And glibc-common is almost _entirely_ locale and i18n. > Because we still want to be _Fedora_, not a tiny-linux distro but what speaks against sub-packages and a mtea-packge installed as default which pulls all the packages in to have the same state as now but leave the option to remove meta-package and unneeded locale to the administrator? one may say "disk storage is nothing these days" iw ould say: mulitply it with 20, 50, 100 virtual machines on really expensive SAN-storage where "disk space is cheap" is not true -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel |
minimal install
On Oct 15, 2012, at 1:47 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 03:24:09PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: >>>> Total download size: 94 M >>>> Installed size: 401 M >>> Of which one quarter is the kernel and the other quarter is glibc locale >>> support, right? >> Or more: >> 122659574 kernel >> 117821428 glibc-common >> 35623360 linux-firmware >> 14233540 coreutils >> 13845828 glibc > > So, if a minimal image is a very high priority, this could be shrunk. > Handwaving aside the difficulty for a moment, if the default kernel split > out some of the drivers, maybe that could get down to 60MB. Leave out > linux-firmware.... And glibc-common is almost _entirely_ locale and i18n. > Because we still want to be _Fedora_, not a tiny-linux distro, let's leave > coreutils and glibc as-is. Still, though, we've shaved off 200+ MB. > > With this, the three versions of "minimal" you give come down to about: > > @core + kernel: 300MB > systemd [...] yum: 240MB 20% savings > systemd + not yum: 195M 35% savings > > Chew away at the dependencies and at the size of some of the other packages > (python 2to3, I'm looking at you), and we could get the middle option down > below 200MB. In my opinion, Minimal should include yum. Without yum, Minimal is suddenly not Fedora. It's like the brim is totally missing. Chris Murphy -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel |
minimal install
Am 15.10.2012 22:02, schrieb Chris Murphy:
> On Oct 15, 2012, at 1:47 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: >> With this, the three versions of "minimal" you give come down to about: >> >> @core + kernel: 300MB >> systemd [...] yum: 240MB 20% savings >> systemd + not yum: 195M 35% savings >> >> Chew away at the dependencies and at the size of some of the other packages >> (python 2to3, I'm looking at you), and we could get the middle option down >> below 200MB. > > In my opinion, Minimal should include yum. Without yum, Minimal is suddenly not Fedora. It's like the brim is totally missing. +1 yum/rpm is the core of a linux-distribution all other dependencies in my opinion should be as less as possible - if you decide "minimal" you should be aware if some packages are missing, in the worst case the firmware of your NIC but even this is solveable easy by put it on a CD/USB or mount a ISO in a VM to get network access - on the other side if you have no firmwares, apckages you are not active using you are able to make really tight systems having 20 of them affects how large the roofs has to be for your needs x count of instalaltions in a virtual environment after the setup it affects the amount of downloads for updates * mirror load * time for the updates * possible temporary dependency-problems * space fpr full vm-images (backups) * time for restore of the backups * time for cloning test-VMs cunclusion: even in days of really large and cheap disks there are many reasons fro as small as possible system footprints and in days of more and more VM/cloud setups this becomes meaningful in many cases -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 09:07 AM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.