Xfce SIG?
Greetings.
I'd like to do a bit of informal polling here and see if there is enough interest in forming a Xfce SIG. Right now, I maintain the Xfce packages and help with plugins, Christoph Wickert maintains all the plugins and helps with the main packages, and Rahul Sundaram maintains the Xfce spin. Are there enough other people out there interested in Xfce to make forming a SIG worthwhile? I have been really busy of late and would love some help with a few of the Xfce enhancement bugs at least: 433573 - RFE: add mixer and trash applett to the default panel config (needs clean patch) 433838 - RFE: Fedora icon in desktop menu (has a patch, but somehow is not working fully right). Ideas, patches, suggestions are always welcome, but if there are enough folks out there that want to contribute we can form up a SIG. Feel free to email me directly or followup to this post to show your interest. Thanks, kevin -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list |
Xfce SIG?
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Xfce SIG? From: Kevin Fenzi <kevin@scrye.com> To: fedora-devel-list@redhat.com Date: 04/07/2008 03:33 PM Greetings. Hi Kevin, I was thinking about this for a while, and I would like to show my interest. You may or may not remember me from the times I've emailed you about XFCE, but I am a full time XFCE user. I've also dabbed at directly communicating with the XFCE group (bug reports, etc). Unfortunately my time for actual coding is light, so I may not be able to be productive but I would like to be involved. Also something to consider is to reach out to the XFCE group and the Xubutnu group to collaborate more uniformly. It seems that the Xubuntu group rarely talks to the XFCE group, and the XFCE group rarely speaks to anyone outside. XFCE has good design models in place and it would be a shame for KDE and Gnome to keep this good project buried in publicity. Regards, Mike -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list |
Xfce SIG?
On Tue, 08 Apr 2008 15:18:53 -0500
mike@cchtml.com (Mike Cronenworth) wrote: > Hi Kevin, > > I was thinking about this for a while, and I would like to show my > interest. Excellent. > You may or may not remember me from the times I've emailed you about > XFCE, but I am a full time XFCE user. I've also dabbed at directly > communicating with the XFCE group (bug reports, etc). Unfortunately > my time for actual coding is light, so I may not be able to be > productive but I would like to be involved. Every bit helps. ;) > Also something to consider is to reach out to the XFCE group and the > Xubutnu group to collaborate more uniformly. It seems that the > Xubuntu group rarely talks to the XFCE group, and the XFCE group > rarely speaks to anyone outside. XFCE has good design models in place > and it would be a shame for KDE and Gnome to keep this good project > buried in publicity. Yeah, it would be good for everyone to work closely with upstream. :) Lets see if there is enough interest for a SIG here, and no matter what, please do keep reporting bugs and helping when and where you can. All contributions welcome. > Regards, > Mike kevin -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list |
Xfce SIG?
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 02:33:18PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Are there enough other people out there interested in Xfce to make > forming a SIG worthwhile? I would like to be a lurker. -- Matthew Miller mattdm@mattdm.org <http://mattdm.org/> Boston University Linux ------> <http://linux.bu.edu/> -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list |
Xfce SIG?
Matthew Miller wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 02:33:18PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: Are there enough other people out there interested in Xfce to make forming a SIG worthwhile? I would like to be a lurker. Ditto. I like to use XFCE on my virtual machine on my laptop, but I don't know whether I'll be able to contribute any serious time other than bug reports. If an effort to improve xfce gets started I'll focus more of my bug reporting time to it though. /sighs last quarter of grad school. -- Andrew Farris <lordmorgul@gmail.com> www.lordmorgul.net gpg 0x8300BF29 fingerprint 071D FFE0 4CBC 13FC 7DEB 5BD5 5F89 8E1B 8300 BF29 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list |
Xfce SIG?
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Greetings. I'd like to do a bit of informal polling here and see if there is enough interest in forming a Xfce SIG. Right now, I maintain the Xfce packages and help with plugins, Christoph Wickert maintains all the plugins and helps with the main packages, and Rahul Sundaram maintains the Xfce spin. I thought there was enough interest expressed that I went ahead and created the Xfce SIG. http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Xfce Feel free to join folks. If you are listed, make sure you contribute something though ;-) Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@redhat.com https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 05:49 AM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.