FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 04-04-2008, 07:38 PM
"Chris Weyl"
 
Default How to get the cvs flag

On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Tom spot Callaway <tcallawa@redhat.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 12:55 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> > What feature of a bug report makes the cvs flag show up? I need that flag here:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440639
> >
> > I see the flag on bugs with the "Package Review" component, but that
> > component doesn't seem to be available when the product is "Fedora
> > EPEL". This question is not answered in the text I get when pressing
> > the "Help" button, either.
>
> Weird. Maybe bugs under Fedora EPEL don't expose that. Dave?

Shouldn't all branch requests be handled through the master review
bug, which would only live on the Fedora side?

-Chris
--
Chris Weyl
Ex astris, scientia

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 04-04-2008, 07:40 PM
"Tom "spot" Callaway"
 
Default How to get the cvs flag

On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 12:38 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Tom spot Callaway <tcallawa@redhat.com> wrote:
> > On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 12:55 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> > > What feature of a bug report makes the cvs flag show up? I need that flag here:
> > >
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440639
> > >
> > > I see the flag on bugs with the "Package Review" component, but that
> > > component doesn't seem to be available when the product is "Fedora
> > > EPEL". This question is not answered in the text I get when pressing
> > > the "Help" button, either.
> >
> > Weird. Maybe bugs under Fedora EPEL don't expose that. Dave?
>
> Shouldn't all branch requests be handled through the master review
> bug, which would only live on the Fedora side?

In this specific case, yes, but it is possible to hit the following
scenarios:

1. Package only lives in EPEL
2. No master review bug exists.

~spot

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 04-04-2008, 07:50 PM
"Jon Ciesla"
 
Default How to get the cvs flag

> On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 12:38 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Tom spot Callaway <tcallawa@redhat.com>
>> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 12:55 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
>> > > What feature of a bug report makes the cvs flag show up? I need
>> that flag here:
>> > >
>> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440639
>> > >
>> > > I see the flag on bugs with the "Package Review" component, but
>> that
>> > > component doesn't seem to be available when the product is "Fedora
>> > > EPEL". This question is not answered in the text I get when
>> pressing
>> > > the "Help" button, either.
>> >
>> > Weird. Maybe bugs under Fedora EPEL don't expose that. Dave?
>>
>> Shouldn't all branch requests be handled through the master review
>> bug, which would only live on the Fedora side?
>
> In this specific case, yes, but it is possible to hit the following
> scenarios:
>
> 1. Package only lives in EPEL
> 2. No master review bug exists.

Bug filer here. It's situation 2.

> ~spot
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
>


--
novus ordo absurdum

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 04-04-2008, 07:51 PM
"Tom "spot" Callaway"
 
Default How to get the cvs flag

On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 14:50 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:

> Bug filer here. It's situation 2.

As a temporary workaround, you might try changing the product to
"Fedora".

~spot

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 04-04-2008, 08:23 PM
Toshio Kuratomi
 
Default How to get the cvs flag

Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:

On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 12:38 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote:

On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Tom spot Callaway <tcallawa@redhat.com> wrote:

On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 12:55 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> What feature of a bug report makes the cvs flag show up? I need that flag here:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440639
>
> I see the flag on bugs with the "Package Review" component, but that
> component doesn't seem to be available when the product is "Fedora
> EPEL". This question is not answered in the text I get when pressing
> the "Help" button, either.

Weird. Maybe bugs under Fedora EPEL don't expose that. Dave?

Shouldn't all branch requests be handled through the master review
bug, which would only live on the Fedora side?


In this specific case, yes, but it is possible to hit the following
scenarios:

1. Package only lives in EPEL
2. No master review bug exists.

I am somewhat inclined to disagree with a package living only in EPEL.
EPEL packages are Fedora packages built and/or modified for Enterprise
Linux.


If someone would like to code it, or even just provide a mockup (where
it belongs in the URL hierarchy, form elements, who should be allowed
etc), there's an open ticket to do this via the packagedb in the future.
Having the fields added to a web form means that cvsadmins wouldn't
have to spend time cut and pasting the values which would be greatly
appreciated by all the cvsadmins I know.


-Toshio

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 04-07-2008, 12:25 PM
"Jon Ciesla"
 
Default How to get the cvs flag

> Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
>> On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 12:38 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote:
>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 12:00 PM, Tom spot Callaway
>>> <tcallawa@redhat.com> wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 2008-04-04 at 12:55 -0600, Jerry James wrote:
>>>> > What feature of a bug report makes the cvs flag show up? I need
>>>> that flag here:
>>>> >
>>>> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=440639
>>>> >
>>>> > I see the flag on bugs with the "Package Review" component, but
>>>> that
>>>> > component doesn't seem to be available when the product is "Fedora
>>>> > EPEL". This question is not answered in the text I get when
>>>> pressing
>>>> > the "Help" button, either.
>>>>
>>>> Weird. Maybe bugs under Fedora EPEL don't expose that. Dave?
>>> Shouldn't all branch requests be handled through the master review
>>> bug, which would only live on the Fedora side?
>>
>> In this specific case, yes, but it is possible to hit the following
>> scenarios:
>>
>> 1. Package only lives in EPEL
>> 2. No master review bug exists.
>>
> I am somewhat inclined to disagree with a package living only in EPEL.
> EPEL packages are Fedora packages built and/or modified for Enterprise
> Linux.
>
> If someone would like to code it, or even just provide a mockup (where
> it belongs in the URL hierarchy, form elements, who should be allowed
> etc), there's an open ticket to do this via the packagedb in the future.
> Having the fields added to a web form means that cvsadmins wouldn't
> have to spend time cut and pasting the values which would be greatly
> appreciated by all the cvsadmins I know.

I changed the bug to rawhide, and it's fine now. Thanks, all!

> -Toshio
>
> --
> fedora-devel-list mailing list
> fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list


--
novus ordo absurdum

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 07:32 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org