FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 04-03-2008, 02:34 PM
Josh Boyer
 
Default F8->F9 upgrade check

Hi All,

Below you'll find the current list of packages that have F8->F9 upgrade
problems. Maintainers, please look this over and try to fix this up
before final development freeze.

josh

ardour:
F8-updates > F9 (0:2.3.1-3.fc8 > 0:2.2-3.fc9)

blam:
F8-updates > F9 (0:1.8.3-14.fc8 > 0:1.8.3-13.fc9)

bouml-doc:
F8-updates > F9 (0:3.4-1 > 0:3.0-2)

dejagnu:
F8-updates > F9 (1:1.4.4-11.fc8 > 1:1.4.4-11)

driftnet:
F8-updates > F9 (0:0.1.6-19.20040426cvs.fc8 > 0:0.1.6-16.20040426cvs.fc9)

eclipse-changelog:
F8-updates > F9 (1:2.6.1-3.fc8 > 1:2.6.0-2.fc9)

ElectricFence:
F8-updates > F9 (0:2.2.2-25.fc8 > 0:2.2.2-25)

evolution-rss:
F8-updates > F9 (0:0.0.8-7.fc8 > 0:0.0.8-6.fc9)

ghc:
F8-updates > F9 (0:6.8.2-8.fc8 > 0:6.8.2-2.fc9)

gtkmozembedmm:
F8-updates > F9 (0:1.4.2.cvs20060817-19.fc8 > 0:1.4.2.cvs20060817-17.fc9)

haproxy:
F8-updates > F9 (0:1.3.14.3-2.fc8 > 0:1.3.14.3-1.fc9)

imlib2:
F8-updates > F9 (0:1.4.0-6.fc8 > 0:1.4.0-5.fc9)

kazehakase:
F8-updates > F9 (0:0.5.4-1.fc8 > 0:0.5.0-1.fc9.2)

liferea:
F8-updates > F9 (0:1.4.13-2.fc8 > 0:1.4.13-1.fc9)

mono-zeroconf:
F8-updates > F9 (0:0.7.5-4.fc8 > 0:0.7.5-3.fc9)

namazu:
F8-updates > F9 (0:2.0.18-2.fc8 > 0:2.0.18-1.fc9)

nx:
F8-updates > F9 (0:3.1.0-25.1.fc8 > 0:2.1.0-24.fc9)

openvrml:
F8-updates > F9 (0:0.17.5-4.fc8 > 0:0.17.5-1.fc9)

perl-Device-SerialPort:
F8 > F9 (0:1.003001-1.fc8 > 0:1.04-3.fc9)

php-magickwand:
F8-updates > F9 (0:1.0.6-2.fc8 > 0:1.0.6-1.fc9)

pybluez:
F8 > F9 (0:0.9.2-1.fc7 > 0:0.9.1-4.fc9)

setroubleshoot-plugins:
F8-updates > F9 (0:2.0.4-4.fc8 > 0:2.0.4-1.fc9)

streamtuner:
F8-updates > F9 (0:0.99.99-19.fc8 > 0:0.99.99-17.fc9)

vtk:
F8-updates > F9 (0:5.0.4-19.fc8 > 0:5.0.3-22.fc9)


--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 04-03-2008, 02:41 PM
"Stephen John Smoogen"
 
Default F8->F9 upgrade check

On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Below you'll find the current list of packages that have F8->F9 upgrade
> problems. Maintainers, please look this over and try to fix this up
> before final development freeze.
>

Wow.. thats a pretty short list from some earlier releases. Congrats
on that people.



--
Stephen J Smoogen. -- CSIRT/Linux System Administrator
How far that little candle throws his beams! So shines a good deed
in a naughty world. = Shakespeare. "The Merchant of Venice"

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 04-03-2008, 02:45 PM
"Jon Ciesla"
 
Default F8->F9 upgrade check

> Hi All,
>
> Below you'll find the current list of packages that have F8->F9 upgrade
> problems. Maintainers, please look this over and try to fix this up
> before final development freeze.
>

> nx:
> F8-updates > F9 (0:3.1.0-25.1.fc8 > 0:2.1.0-24.fc9)

I believe The version in F8-updates is in rawhide, should just need the
proper tag applied.

--
novus ordo absurdum

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 04-03-2008, 02:46 PM
"Debarshi Ray"
 
Default F8->F9 upgrade check

> bouml-doc:
> F8-updates > F9 (0:3.4-1 > 0:3.0-2)

It does not use a DistTag so the package in F-8 updates should be
inherited in F-9/Rawhide too. Jesse Keating usually does some magic
and takes care of this every time there is a new update.

I have just requested a new bouml-doc-4.2-1 to be pushed into F-7 updates:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F7/FEDORA-2008-2856

So it might be better if we made sure this one gets inherited
correctly into F-8 and F-9/Rawhide instead of bothering with the older
package.

Cheerio,
Debarshi
--
"From what we get, we can make a living; what we give, however, makes a life."
-- Arthur Ashe

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 04-03-2008, 02:47 PM
Josh Boyer
 
Default F8->F9 upgrade check

On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 09:45 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Below you'll find the current list of packages that have F8->F9 upgrade
> > problems. Maintainers, please look this over and try to fix this up
> > before final development freeze.
> >
>
> > nx:
> > F8-updates > F9 (0:3.1.0-25.1.fc8 > 0:2.1.0-24.fc9)
>
> I believe The version in F8-updates is in rawhide, should just need the
> proper tag applied.

I believe you're wrong:

[jwboyer@vader releng]$ koji latest-pkg dist-rawhide nx
Build Tag Built by
---------------------------------------- --------------------
----------------
nx-2.1.0-24.fc9 dist-f9 athimm

josh

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 04-03-2008, 02:49 PM
Josh Boyer
 
Default F8->F9 upgrade check

On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 08:41 -0600, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 8:34 AM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Below you'll find the current list of packages that have F8->F9 upgrade
> > problems. Maintainers, please look this over and try to fix this up
> > before final development freeze.
> >
>
> Wow.. thats a pretty short list from some earlier releases. Congrats
> on that people.

Yes, indeed. I was quite pleased as well. Good job! We'll need to be
diligent about keeping the list as close to 0 as possible once final
freeze hits.

josh

note: i just dusted off the checker this morning so there could be some
issues but some brief sanity checking seemed to validate the results.

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 04-03-2008, 03:02 PM
"Jon Ciesla"
 
Default F8->F9 upgrade check

> On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 09:45 -0500, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> > Hi All,
>> >
>> > Below you'll find the current list of packages that have F8->F9
>> upgrade
>> > problems. Maintainers, please look this over and try to fix this up
>> > before final development freeze.
>> >
>>
>> > nx:
>> > F8-updates > F9 (0:3.1.0-25.1.fc8 > 0:2.1.0-24.fc9)
>>
>> I believe The version in F8-updates is in rawhide, should just need the
>> proper tag applied.
>
> I believe you're wrong:
>
> [jwboyer@vader releng]$ koji latest-pkg dist-rawhide nx
> Build Tag Built by
> ---------------------------------------- --------------------
> ----------------
> nx-2.1.0-24.fc9 dist-f9 athimm
>
> josh
>

I see, the build failed for that one. I assume Axel is on it. I don't
see the build log.

--
novus ordo absurdum

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 04-03-2008, 03:14 PM
Josh Boyer
 
Default F8->F9 upgrade check

On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 20:16 +0530, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> > bouml-doc:
> > F8-updates > F9 (0:3.4-1 > 0:3.0-2)
>
> It does not use a DistTag so the package in F-8 updates should be
> inherited in F-9/Rawhide too. Jesse Keating usually does some magic
> and takes care of this every time there is a new update.

Erm... no. disttag has nothing to do with koji inheritance. The only
time rawhide will inherit a package from dist-f8-updates is if there
isn't already any form of that package in dist-rawhide.

And you _really_ shouldn't be relying on inheritance anyway. We want
packages in F9 to be built against F9, not F8.

> I have just requested a new bouml-doc-4.2-1 to be pushed into F-7 updates:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F7/FEDORA-2008-2856
>
> So it might be better if we made sure this one gets inherited
> correctly into F-8 and F-9/Rawhide instead of bothering with the older
> package.

No. Build the package properly for each release.

josh

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 04-03-2008, 08:37 PM
Jesse Keating
 
Default F8->F9 upgrade check

On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 10:14 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 20:16 +0530, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> > > bouml-doc:
> > > F8-updates > F9 (0:3.4-1 > 0:3.0-2)
> >
> > It does not use a DistTag so the package in F-8 updates should be
> > inherited in F-9/Rawhide too. Jesse Keating usually does some magic
> > and takes care of this every time there is a new update.
>
> Erm... no. disttag has nothing to do with koji inheritance. The only
> time rawhide will inherit a package from dist-f8-updates is if there
> isn't already any form of that package in dist-rawhide.
>
> And you _really_ shouldn't be relying on inheritance anyway. We want
> packages in F9 to be built against F9, not F8.
>
> > I have just requested a new bouml-doc-4.2-1 to be pushed into F-7 updates:
> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F7/FEDORA-2008-2856
> >
> > So it might be better if we made sure this one gets inherited
> > correctly into F-8 and F-9/Rawhide instead of bothering with the older
> > package.
>
> No. Build the package properly for each release.
>
> josh

To be fair, this is one of those packages that we do want inheritance to
work. It's a noarch doc package that really doesn't need to be
"rebuilt" X times and be upgraded needlessly for people when moving from
one dist to another. I'll look into why the inheritance isn't working
right.

--
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- All my bits are free, are yours?
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 
Old 04-03-2008, 09:25 PM
Josh Boyer
 
Default F8->F9 upgrade check

On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 16:37 -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 10:14 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-04-03 at 20:16 +0530, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> > > > bouml-doc:
> > > > F8-updates > F9 (0:3.4-1 > 0:3.0-2)
> > >
> > > It does not use a DistTag so the package in F-8 updates should be
> > > inherited in F-9/Rawhide too. Jesse Keating usually does some magic
> > > and takes care of this every time there is a new update.
> >
> > Erm... no. disttag has nothing to do with koji inheritance. The only
> > time rawhide will inherit a package from dist-f8-updates is if there
> > isn't already any form of that package in dist-rawhide.
> >
> > And you _really_ shouldn't be relying on inheritance anyway. We want
> > packages in F9 to be built against F9, not F8.
> >
> > > I have just requested a new bouml-doc-4.2-1 to be pushed into F-7 updates:
> > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F7/FEDORA-2008-2856
> > >
> > > So it might be better if we made sure this one gets inherited
> > > correctly into F-8 and F-9/Rawhide instead of bothering with the older
> > > package.
> >
> > No. Build the package properly for each release.
> >
> > josh
>
> To be fair, this is one of those packages that we do want inheritance to
> work. It's a noarch doc package that really doesn't need to be
> "rebuilt" X times and be upgraded needlessly for people when moving from
> one dist to another. I'll look into why the inheritance isn't working
> right.

Ah crap. I totally missed that because I'm a moron.

Sorry Debarshi.

josh

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 11:33 AM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org