-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

JaromÃ*r MikeÅ¡ wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've found this link http://irqbalance.org/ which seems to be interesting.
> Maybe irqbalance can be useful for 64studio.
>
It is already packaged in Debian. I am not sure if it is a part of
64Studio, but you can download the .deb here:

http://packages.debian.org/etch/irqbalance
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIyEx7wRXgH3rKGfMRAsd1AJ9FK2H/QdToZ89lVPKGqxn1x3nCqQCfcpx1
959VYh9+a8eSgpN1tu2E6AY=
=cqii
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
64studio-devel mailing list
64studio-devel@64studio.com
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-devel

Hi Gustin,

what is your experience with this package? As regards performance.
Can be "irqbalance" useful for single core processor too?

Cheers

Mira



< >
< > I've found this link http://irqbalance.org/ which seems to be interesting.
< > Maybe irqbalance can be useful for 64studio.
< >
< It is already packaged in Debian. I am not sure if it is a part of
< 64Studio, but you can download the .deb here:
<
< http://packages.debian.org/etch/irqbalance
< -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
< Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
< Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
<
< iD8DBQFIyEx7wRXgH3rKGfMRAsd1AJ9FK2H/QdToZ89lVPKGqxn1x3nCqQCfcpx1
< 959VYh9+a8eSgpN1tu2E6AY=
< =cqii
< -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
<
<
<

_______________________________________________
64studio-devel mailing list
64studio-devel@64studio.com
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-devel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

JaromÃ*r MikeÅ¡ wrote:
> Hi Gustin,
>
> what is your experience with this package? As regards performance.
> Can be "irqbalance" useful for single core processor too?
>
Honestly, I can't "feel" the difference, at least in a proper double
blind. That was a depressing experiment

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFIyF8xwRXgH3rKGfMRAoAQAKCEpCCk4sS2iI1qZXvCFc 0Fc3c1gQCfcifu
jJnRvQz1QBFZIkDrNtNFYVU=
=rbuB
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

_______________________________________________
64studio-devel mailing list
64studio-devel@64studio.com
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-devel

< >
< > what is your experience with this package? As regards performance.
< > Can be "irqbalance" useful for single core processor too?
< >
< Honestly, I can't "feel" the difference, at least in a proper double
< blind. That was a depressing experiment


I will try it ... hopefully without any depression :-)
Thanks for link.

M.

_______________________________________________
64studio-devel mailing list
64studio-devel@64studio.com
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-devel

On Wed, Sep 10, 2008 at 05:58:41PM -0600, Gustin Johnson wrote:
> Honestly, I can't "feel" the difference, at least in a proper double
> blind. That was a depressing experiment

The web site says it's use should be "invisible" to the user. I don't
think you're supposed to feel any difference!
--
Michael

_______________________________________________
64studio-devel mailing list
64studio-devel@64studio.com
http://lists.64studio.com/mailman/listinfo/64studio-devel

Hi all..

I have centos 5.2

There is a cron file that is commented out to auto update the rules of
spamassassin
Location: /etc/cron.d/sa-update

This file is chmod 600, should it not be 755? All the other crons are 755

This line is commented.
#10 4 * * * root /usr/share/spamassassin/sa-update.cron 2>&1 | tee -a
/var/log/sa-update.log


Questions

1- should I re chmod it to 600 or leave it at 755?

Is anyone else using this? The cron file says to read a certain wiki page
and do this cron at your own peril. Yet I find no warnings on that wiki page
that would make me think this was bad.


Thanks all

_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Bob Hoffman <bob@bobhoffman.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all..
>
> I have centos 5.2
>
> There is a cron file that is commented out to auto update the rules of
> spamassassin
> Location: /etc/cron.d/sa-update
>
> This file is chmod 600, should it not be 755? All the other crons are 755
>
> This line is commented.
> #10 4 * * * root /usr/share/spamassassin/sa-update.cron 2>&1 | tee -a
> /var/log/sa-update.log
>
>
> Questions
>
> 1- should I re chmod it to 600 or leave it at 755?
>
> Is anyone else using this? The cron file says to read a certain wiki page
> and do this cron at your own peril. Yet I find no warnings on that wiki page
> that would make me think this was bad.
>
>
> Thanks all

Bob: In the future, please include something in the Subject line, that
will give the list an idea of what your message is about. I think you
will get more replies if you do that.. Lanny
_______________________________________________
CentOS mailing list
CentOS@centos.org
http://lists.centos.org/mailman/listinfo/centos

Hi,

As explained here , I'd like to take over the fsaa1655g package - but it needs to be orphaned first. Can this be done?


- Mads

2008/9/23 Mads Michelsen <chochem@gmail.com>:
> but it needs to be orphaned first. Can this be done?
done


--
Andrea `BaSh` Scarpino
Arch Linux Trusted User
Linux User: #430842

On 9/23/08, Mads Michelsen <chochem@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As explained here <http://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=55635> , I'd
> like to take over the
> fsaa1655g<http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=8281>package - but
> it needs to be orphaned first. Can this be done?
>
> - Mads
>
done