I'll take this one to keep freetennis, which seems to be a fairly highly
rated game. gdk-pixbuf is FTBFS, but I think I can get it building before
alpha.
I have already updated the package database to become owner of these three.
Only the gdk-pixbuf FTBFS fixing needs to get done ASAP.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Am Dienstag, den 12.07.2011, 15:28 -0400 schrieb Bill Nottingham:
> Orphan link-grammar
I am taking this one. As parsing stuff is always a fancy thing
- fabian
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
07-12-2011, 08:14 PM
Bruno Wolff III
Retiring packages in F-16
On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 16:22:05 -0400,
Bill Nottingham <notting@redhat.com> wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III (bruno@wolff.to) said:
> > > Orphan: gdk-pixbuf
> > > freetennis requires gdk-pixbuf-devel = 1:0.22.0-38.fc12
> >
> > I'll take this one to keep freetennis, which seems to be a fairly highly
> > rated game. gdk-pixbuf is FTBFS, but I think I can get it building before
> > alpha.
>
> This looks like a rather bogus dep, IMO - gdk-pixbuf is for GTK1 apps,
> and freetennis is gtk2.
Thanks. For the time being I'll still take it. I'll also ask for access
to freetennis so I can do a freetennis build that doesn't require it.
If I can fix the FTBFS I am willing to hang on to it for a while, though
people interested in protecting the other dependencies are strongly
encouraged to sign on as comaintainers.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
07-12-2011, 08:22 PM
Bill Nottingham
Retiring packages in F-16
Bruno Wolff III (bruno@wolff.to) said:
> > Orphan: gdk-pixbuf
> > freetennis requires gdk-pixbuf-devel = 1:0.22.0-38.fc12
>
> I'll take this one to keep freetennis, which seems to be a fairly highly
> rated game. gdk-pixbuf is FTBFS, but I think I can get it building before
> alpha.
This looks like a rather bogus dep, IMO - gdk-pixbuf is for GTK1 apps,
and freetennis is gtk2.
Bill
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
07-12-2011, 08:28 PM
Bill Nottingham
Retiring packages in F-16
Bill Nottingham (notting@redhat.com) said:
> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> It's that time again for Fedora 16.
>
> New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
> failed to build since before Fedora 14.
>
> The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If
> you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up.
Note that due to the pkgdb issue Toshio mentions in a later thread,
this list is incomplete. I'll send a new one shortly.
Bill
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
07-12-2011, 08:30 PM
Bill Nottingham
Retiring packages in F-16
Bruno Wolff III (bruno@wolff.to) said:
> > > I'll take this one to keep freetennis, which seems to be a fairly highly
> > > rated game. gdk-pixbuf is FTBFS, but I think I can get it building before
> > > alpha.
> >
> > This looks like a rather bogus dep, IMO - gdk-pixbuf is for GTK1 apps,
> > and freetennis is gtk2.
>
> Thanks. For the time being I'll still take it. I'll also ask for access
> to freetennis so I can do a freetennis build that doesn't require it.
> If I can fix the FTBFS I am willing to hang on to it for a while, though
> people interested in protecting the other dependencies are strongly
> encouraged to sign on as comaintainers.
I should be more clear - the fact that it's showing up as a dep at all
in the report appears to be a script error, although one I haven't tracked
down yet.
Bill
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
07-12-2011, 08:39 PM
Bill Nottingham
Retiring packages in F-16
Bill Nottingham (notting@redhat.com) said:
> > Thanks. For the time being I'll still take it. I'll also ask for access
> > to freetennis so I can do a freetennis build that doesn't require it.
> > If I can fix the FTBFS I am willing to hang on to it for a while, though
> > people interested in protecting the other dependencies are strongly
> > encouraged to sign on as comaintainers.
>
> I should be more clear - the fact that it's showing up as a dep at all
> in the report appears to be a script error, although one I haven't tracked
> down yet.
All of these except for xmms-xosd and xosd are bad BuildRequires in the
source package.
Bill
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
07-12-2011, 08:47 PM
Kalev Lember
Retiring packages in F-16
On 07/12/2011 11:30 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Bruno Wolff III (bruno@wolff.to) said:
>>>> I'll take this one to keep freetennis, which seems to be a fairly highly
>>>> rated game. gdk-pixbuf is FTBFS, but I think I can get it building before
>>>> alpha.
>>>
>>> This looks like a rather bogus dep, IMO - gdk-pixbuf is for GTK1 apps,
>>> and freetennis is gtk2.
>>
>> Thanks. For the time being I'll still take it. I'll also ask for access
>> to freetennis so I can do a freetennis build that doesn't require it.
>> If I can fix the FTBFS I am willing to hang on to it for a while, though
>> people interested in protecting the other dependencies are strongly
>> encouraged to sign on as comaintainers.
>
> I should be more clear - the fact that it's showing up as a dep at all
> in the report appears to be a script error, although one I haven't tracked
> down yet.
Freetennis apparently buildrequires gdk-pixbuf-devel and that's showing
up in the report; I think the script is doing the right thing here.
In any case, I'm pretty confident that freetennis doesn't actually make
any use of old gdk-pixbuf, but uses gdk-pixbuf2 instead:
$ repoquery -q --requires freetennis | grep pixbuf
libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
--
Kalev
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Retiring packages in F-16
