FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 07-02-2011, 05:07 PM
Michał Piotrowski
 
Default PostgreSQL 9.1 and Lucene Core for F16

Hi,

Are there any plans to provide PostgreSQL 9.1 in Fedora 16? PostgreSQL
9.1 is in beta2 now and it's scheduled for Q3 2011.

It would be nice to see Lucene Core in F16. There is an old Lucene
2.9.x for F16 - the latest upstream version is 3.3.

--
Best regards,
Michal

http://eventhorizon.pl/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 07-02-2011, 06:23 PM
Tom Lane
 
Default PostgreSQL 9.1 and Lucene Core for F16

=?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= <mkkp4x4@gmail.com> writes:
> Are there any plans to provide PostgreSQL 9.1 in Fedora 16? PostgreSQL
> 9.1 is in beta2 now and it's scheduled for Q3 2011.

If upstream releases it in time, it'll be in F16. I would put the odds
of that no better than 50-50, though. I'm not going to push a new major
PG release into F16 post-beta, and with the F16 beta change deadline
only 2 months away, it's pretty iffy.

Of course, you could always use the PGDG RPMs whenever you think 9.1 is
stable enough for your taste. I'm sure Devrim will be producing RPMs
for F16 as soon as it's released.

regards, tom lane
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 07-02-2011, 09:05 PM
Michał Piotrowski
 
Default PostgreSQL 9.1 and Lucene Core for F16

2011/7/2 Tom Lane <tgl@redhat.com>:
> =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= <mkkp4x4@gmail.com> writes:
>> Are there any plans to provide PostgreSQL 9.1 in Fedora 16? PostgreSQL
>> 9.1 is in beta2 now and it's scheduled for Q3 2011.
>
> If upstream releases it in time, it'll be in F16. *I would put the odds
> of that no better than 50-50, though. *I'm not going to push a new major
> PG release into F16 post-beta, and with the F16 beta change deadline
> only 2 months away, it's pretty iffy.

Ok, thanks for the information.

>
> Of course, you could always use the PGDG RPMs whenever you think 9.1 is
> stable enough for your taste. *I'm sure Devrim will be producing RPMs
> for F16 as soon as it's released.

I'm tracking his svn repo, but PGSQL 9.1 wasn't updated from alpha3 so
I guess that he has a lot of other activities than providing latest
and greatest PostgreSQL version

>
> * * * * * * * * * * * *regards, tom lane
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>



--
Best regards,
Michal

http://eventhorizon.pl/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 07-04-2011, 06:42 AM
Alexander Kurtakov
 
Default PostgreSQL 9.1 and Lucene Core for F16

On 09:34:10 AM Saturday, July 02, 2011 Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Are there any plans to provide PostgreSQL 9.1 in Fedora 16? PostgreSQL
> 9.1 is in beta2 now and it's scheduled for Q3 2011.
>
> It would be nice to see Lucene Core in F16. There is an old Lucene
> 2.9.x for F16 - the latest upstream version is 3.3.
As the Lucene maintainer I feel obligated to answer the Lucene part of the
question.
No, there won't be 3.3 in F16 unless someone else steps as the official
maintainer or a miracle happens and more people start to work on the
underlying Java stack. Updating Lucene is so low in my todo list that I don't
envision it happening soon. Note that I don't mind Lucene update actually I'm
all for it but I don't have the time(now) to deal with bugs caused by API
breaking release so if someone wants to update he will have to sign up for
them - i.e. becoming the official maintainer.

Alex
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 07-04-2011, 11:11 AM
Michał Piotrowski
 
Default PostgreSQL 9.1 and Lucene Core for F16

Hi,

2011/7/4 Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako@redhat.com>:
> On 09:34:10 AM Saturday, July 02, 2011 Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Are there any plans to provide PostgreSQL 9.1 in Fedora 16? PostgreSQL
>> 9.1 is in beta2 now and it's scheduled for Q3 2011.
>>
>> It would be nice to see Lucene Core in F16. There is an old Lucene
>> 2.9.x for F16 - the latest upstream version is 3.3.
> As the Lucene maintainer I feel obligated to answer the Lucene part of the
> question.
> No, there won't be 3.3 in F16 unless someone else steps as the official
> maintainer or a miracle happens and more people start to work on the
> underlying Java stack. Updating Lucene is so low in my todo list that I don't
> envision it happening soon. Note that I don't mind Lucene update actually I'm
> all for it but I don't have the time(now) to deal with bugs caused by API
> breaking release so if someone wants to update he will have to sign up for
> them - i.e. becoming the official maintainer.

Unfortunately I do not have enough java programming experience to help
you in fixing problems.

Thanks for your answer.

>
> Alex
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel



--
Best regards,
Michal

http://eventhorizon.pl/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 07-04-2011, 03:58 PM
Stanislav Ochotnicky
 
Default PostgreSQL 9.1 and Lucene Core for F16

Excerpts from Michał Piotrowski's message of Mon Jul 04 13:11:06 +0200 2011:
> Hi,
>
> 2011/7/4 Alexander Kurtakov <akurtako@redhat.com>:
> > On 09:34:10 AM Saturday, July 02, 2011 Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Are there any plans to provide PostgreSQL 9.1 in Fedora 16? PostgreSQL
> >> 9.1 is in beta2 now and it's scheduled for Q3 2011.
> >>
> >> It would be nice to see Lucene Core in F16. There is an old Lucene
> >> 2.9.x for F16 - the latest upstream version is 3.3.
> > As the Lucene maintainer I feel obligated to answer the Lucene part of the
> > question.
> > No, there won't be 3.3 in F16 unless someone else steps as the official
> > maintainer or a miracle happens and more people start to work on the
> > underlying Java stack. Updating Lucene is so low in my todo list that I don't
> > envision it happening soon. Note that I don't mind Lucene update actually I'm
> > all for it but I don't have the time(now) to deal with bugs caused by API
> > breaking release so if someone wants to update he will have to sign up for
> > them - i.e. becoming the official maintainer.
>
> Unfortunately I do not have enough java programming experience to help
> you in fixing problems.

There might be a more simple way to do it though. There was already a
started lucene3 review that would be able to live in parallel with
current lucene 2.x. In the end it wasn't finished, but if you feel up
to it you can continue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664826

Good luck,

--
Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@redhat.com>
Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno

PGP: 7B087241
Red Hat Inc. http://cz.redhat.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 07-05-2011, 03:55 PM
Michał Piotrowski
 
Default PostgreSQL 9.1 and Lucene Core for F16

2011/7/4 Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@redhat.com>:
> Excerpts from Michał Piotrowski's message of Mon Jul 04 13:11:06 +0200 2011:
>> Unfortunately I do not have enough java programming experience to help
>> you in fixing problems.
>
> There might be a more simple way to do it though. There was already a
> started lucene3 review that would be able to live in parallel with
> current lucene 2.x. In the end it wasn't finished, but if you feel up
> to it you can continue:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=664826

Thanks for the link, I'll look at this tonight and see if I can help.
(Although I have no experience with creating spec files, but I will
try to remove at least a few rpmlint warnings)

>
> Good luck,
>
> --
> Stanislav Ochotnicky <sochotnicky@redhat.com>
> Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno
>
> PGP: 7B087241
> Red Hat Inc. * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * http://cz.redhat.com
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>



--
Best regards,
Michal

http://eventhorizon.pl/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 09-11-2011, 09:13 AM
Michał Piotrowski
 
Default PostgreSQL 9.1 and Lucene Core for F16

Hi,

2011/7/2 Tom Lane <tgl@redhat.com>:
> =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= <mkkp4x4@gmail.com> writes:
>> Are there any plans to provide PostgreSQL 9.1 in Fedora 16? PostgreSQL
>> 9.1 is in beta2 now and it's scheduled for Q3 2011.
>
> If upstream releases it in time, it'll be in F16. *I would put the odds
> of that no better than 50-50, though. *I'm not going to push a new major
> PG release into F16 post-beta, and with the F16 beta change deadline
> only 2 months away, it's pretty iffy.

I see a new tag in git repo REL9_1_0

F16 beta is targeted at 2011-09-27, so there is still a little time to
upgrade PostgreSQL for this release.

>
> Of course, you could always use the PGDG RPMs whenever you think 9.1 is
> stable enough for your taste. *I'm sure Devrim will be producing RPMs
> for F16 as soon as it's released.
>
> * * * * * * * * * * * *regards, tom lane
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>



--
Best regards,
Michal

http://eventhorizon.pl/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 09-11-2011, 12:31 PM
Bruno Wolff III
 
Default PostgreSQL 9.1 and Lucene Core for F16

On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 11:13:03 +0200,
Michał Piotrowski <mkkp4x4@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2011/7/2 Tom Lane <tgl@redhat.com>:
> > =?ISO-8859-2?Q?Micha=B3_Piotrowski?= <mkkp4x4@gmail.com> writes:
> >> Are there any plans to provide PostgreSQL 9.1 in Fedora 16? PostgreSQL
> >> 9.1 is in beta2 now and it's scheduled for Q3 2011.
> >
> > If upstream releases it in time, it'll be in F16. *I would put the odds
> > of that no better than 50-50, though. *I'm not going to push a new major
> > PG release into F16 post-beta, and with the F16 beta change deadline
> > only 2 months away, it's pretty iffy.
>
> I see a new tag in git repo REL9_1_0
>
> F16 beta is targeted at 2011-09-27, so there is still a little time to
> upgrade PostgreSQL for this release.

The beta freeze starts two weeks before that and even if it gets in the next
couple of days it is going to need testing to get positive karma before
making it to updates on time. So there is really extremely little time to
get 9.1 in in time for f16 beta.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 09-11-2011, 03:27 PM
Tom Lane
 
Default PostgreSQL 9.1 and Lucene Core for F16

Bruno Wolff III <bruno@wolff.to> writes:
> On Sun, Sep 11, 2011 at 11:13:03 +0200,
> Micha? Piotrowski <mkkp4x4@gmail.com> wrote:
>> F16 beta is targeted at 2011-09-27, so there is still a little time to
>> upgrade PostgreSQL for this release.

> The beta freeze starts two weeks before that and even if it gets in the next
> couple of days it is going to need testing to get positive karma before
> making it to updates on time. So there is really extremely little time to
> get 9.1 in in time for f16 beta.

Yeah. I have done test packaging of 9.1rc1 already, so it's pretty much
ready to go on my end. I would be prepared to push 9.1 into f16 on
Monday if there were enough people willing to test and up-karma it
before the freeze ... any volunteers out there?

regards, tom lane
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 09:41 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org