FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 04-10-2011, 01:44 PM
Andrea Francia
 
Default About the rename of restore-trash in trash-cli package

Dear Fedora developers,* *I'm the upstream developer of trash-cli.I saw in package announce[1] that you decided to change of restore-trash into trash-restore.I appreciate your work but in this case I'm*not happy with one of the last change.*




I'm preparing [4] a program called trash-restore to be included in trash-cli that would behave in a different way that restore-trash. So your decision could cause me problems.




I'd better liked if this type of change will be discussed with me before to be implemented in a so famous distribution.
In the time that was published it was using these command names:



*- trash (for trashing a file)*- empty-trash (for empty the trashcan)*- list-trash (for listing the contents of the trashcan)*- restore-trash (for put back a trashed file)




I was happy about my command name choice as the packagers of Debian and Ubuntu were. So they packaged my application for those*distributions.
Instead, during the first packaging for Fedora, some problems happen.*The name 'trash' wasn't accepted by the*package reviewer so after a long discussion (see [2], and [3]) and I end up to change the names into: trash-put, trash-empty, trash-list. But I left alone restore-trash for reserving trash-restore for future development as described in the wiki [4].*




All the trash-* are supposed to ben non interactive, the new trash-restore will be but the old restore-trash is not.
Thank you

[1] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-March/057122.html[2] http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2008-October/011247.html



[3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122[4] http://code.google.com/p/trash-cli/wiki/ProposedUserinterface




--
Andrea Francia

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 04-10-2011, 02:07 PM
Ankur Sinha
 
Default About the rename of restore-trash in trash-cli package

Hello Andrea,

On Sun, 2011-04-10 at 15:39 +0200, Andrea Francia wrote:
> Dear Fedora developers,
> I'm the upstream developer of trash-cli.
> I saw in package announce[1] that you decided to change of
> restore-trash into trash-restore.
> I appreciate your work but in this case I'm not happy with one of the
> last change.
>
>
> I'm preparing [4] a program called trash-restore to be included in
> trash-cli that would behave in a different way that restore-trash. So
> your decision could cause me problems.
>
>
> I'd better liked if this type of change will be discussed with me
> before to be implemented in a so famous distribution.
>
>
> In the time that was published it was using these command names:
> - trash (for trashing a file)
> - empty-trash (for empty the trashcan)
> - list-trash (for listing the contents of the trashcan)
> - restore-trash (for put back a trashed file)
>
>
> I was happy about my command name choice as the packagers of Debian
> and Ubuntu were. So they packaged my application for
> those distributions.
>
>
> Instead, during the first packaging for Fedora, some problems happen.
> The name 'trash' wasn't accepted by the package reviewer so after a
> long discussion (see [2], and [3]) and I end up to change the names
> into: trash-put, trash-empty, trash-list. But I left alone
> restore-trash for reserving trash-restore for future development as
> described in the wiki [4].

The name change was only temporary. Once you release a new version, I
can rectify this with the update that I push (it's one line in the
spec). I really wasn't aware that you weren't using it because you had
it reserved for future use. I did file a ticket on the trac before
implementing this change (which was closed with a WONTFIX). If you'd
like, I could push an update to remove the name change, or I could do it
when you release a new version. Please do let me know.

>
>
> All the trash-* are supposed to ben non interactive, the new
> trash-restore will be but the old restore-trash is not.
>
>
> Thank you
>
>
> [1]
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/package-announce/2011-March/057122.html
> [2]
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2008-October/011247.html
> [3] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448122
> [4] http://code.google.com/p/trash-cli/wiki/ProposedUserinterface
>
>
> --
> Andrea Francia
>

Regards,
Thanks,
Ankur

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 04:39 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org