Broken dependency for RHEL6
Hi,
I am receiving the following email from Koji: ---------------------------------------------------------------- fmtools has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On x86_64: * * * *fmtools-tkradio-2.0.1-2.el6.noarch requires python-lirc On i386: * * * *fmtools-tkradio-2.0.1-2.el6.noarch requires python-lirc On ppc64: * * * *fmtools-tkradio-2.0.1-2.el6.noarch requires python-lirc Please resolve this as soon as possible. --------------------------------------------------------------- It is just a question of buiding python-lirc, which builds fine even on RHEL 5. I have never built anything for RHEL (epel). Can I do that? What is the procedure? Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel |
Broken dependency for RHEL6
On 12/19/2010 03:43 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
> > Hi, > > I am receiving the following email from Koji: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > fmtools has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: > On x86_64: > fmtools-tkradio-2.0.1-2.el6. > noarch requires python-lirc > On i386: > fmtools-tkradio-2.0.1-2.el6.noarch requires python-lirc > On ppc64: > fmtools-tkradio-2.0.1-2.el6.noarch requires python-lirc > Please resolve this as soon as possible. > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > It is just a question of buiding python-lirc, which > builds fine even on RHEL 5. > > I have never built anything for RHEL (epel). > Can I do that? What is the procedure? > > Thanks. > > > -- > Paulo Roma Cavalcanti > LCG - UFRJ > If the el6 branch exists, which it might if it had an el5 branch, just: fedpkg clone python-lirc ; cd python-lirc ; fedpkg switch-branch el6 ; fedpkg build If it doesn't exist, find the review bug and file a SCM maintenence request there, complete with cvs-admin flag=?, for an el6 branch. Once that's fulfilled, do the above. J -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel |
Broken dependency for RHEL6
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:13 PM, Jon Ciesla <limb@jcomserv.net> wrote:
On 12/19/2010 03:43 AM, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: > > Hi, > > I am receiving the following email from Koji: > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > fmtools has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: > On x86_64: > * * * * fmtools-tkradio-2.0.1-2.el6. > noarch requires python-lirc > On i386: > * * * * fmtools-tkradio-2.0.1-2.el6.noarch requires python-lirc > On ppc64: > * * * * fmtools-tkradio-2.0.1-2.el6.noarch requires python-lirc > Please resolve this as soon as possible. > > --------------------------------------------------------------- > > It is just a question of buiding python-lirc, which > builds fine even on RHEL 5. > > I have never built anything for RHEL (epel). > Can I do that? What is the procedure? > > Thanks. > > > -- > Paulo Roma Cavalcanti > LCG - UFRJ > If the el6 branch exists, which it might if it had an el5 branch, just: fedpkg clone python-lirc ; cd python-lirc ; fedpkg switch-branch el6 ; fedpkg build If it doesn't exist, find the review bug and file a SCM maintenence request there, complete with cvs-admin flag=?, for an el6 branch. That is the problem. python-lirc has never been built for RHEL. I know it works because I built it myself on rhel5 a long time ago, and I run it there just fine. I will do the request as you suggested. Thanks. -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel |
Broken dependency for RHEL6
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 12:31:16 -0200
Paulo Cavalcanti <promac@gmail.com> wrote: > That is the problem. python-lirc has never been built for RHEL. > > I know it works because I built it myself on rhel5 a long time ago, > and I run it there just fine. > > I will do the request as you suggested. You may also wish to request co-maintainer status in pkgdb if you would like to help maintain this package. It looks like it's owned by thias. kevin -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel |
Broken dependency for RHEL6
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@scrye.com> wrote:
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 12:31:16 -0200 Paulo Cavalcanti <promac@gmail.com> wrote: > That is the problem. python-lirc has never been built for RHEL. > > I know it works because I built it myself on rhel5 a long time ago, > and I run it there just fine. > > I will do the request as you suggested. You may also wish to request co-maintainer status in pkgdb if you would like to help maintain this package. It looks like it's owned by thias. Well, I changed the code for not requiring python-lirc and updated rawhide successfully. But it seems I can not build for RHEL6* (but rhel6 is listed on packagedb for fmtools ...) [cascavel:~/cvs/fmtools] git push Counting objects: 13, done. Delta compression using up to 4 threads. Compressing objects: 100% (7/7), done. Writing objects: 100% (7/7), 1.20 KiB, done. Total 7 (delta 5), reused 0 (delta 0) remote: W refs/heads/el6/master roma DENIED by refs/heads/el[0-9] remote: error: hook declined to update refs/heads/el6/master To ssh://roma@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/fmtools *! [remote rejected] el6 -> el6/master (hook declined) error: failed to push some refs to 'ssh://roma@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/fmtools' -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel |
Broken dependency for RHEL6
Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
> > > On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@scrye.com > <mailto:kevin@scrye.com>> wrote: > > On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 12:31:16 -0200 > Paulo Cavalcanti <promac@gmail.com <mailto:promac@gmail.com>> wrote: > > > That is the problem. python-lirc has never been built for RHEL. > > > > I know it works because I built it myself on rhel5 a long time ago, > > and I run it there just fine. > > > > I will do the request as you suggested. > > You may also wish to request co-maintainer status in pkgdb if you > would > like to help maintain this package. It looks like it's owned by thias. > > > > Well, I changed the code for not requiring python-lirc and updated > rawhide successfully. > > But it seems I can not build for RHEL6 (but rhel6 is listed on > packagedb for fmtools ...) > > [cascavel:~/cvs/fmtools] git push > Counting objects: 13, done. > Delta compression using up to 4 threads. > Compressing objects: 100% (7/7), done. > Writing objects: 100% (7/7), 1.20 KiB, done. > Total 7 (delta 5), reused 0 (delta 0) > remote: W refs/heads/el6/master roma DENIED by refs/heads/el[0-9] > remote: error: hook declined to update refs/heads/el6/master > To ssh://roma@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/fmtools > <http://roma@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/fmtools> > ! [remote rejected] el6 -> el6/master (hook declined) > error: failed to push some refs to > 'ssh://roma@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/fmtools > <http://roma@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/fmtools>' > > > -- > Paulo Roma Cavalcanti > LCG - UFRJ You don't have access in pkgdb for el6. You'll need to request it. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/fmtools J -- in your fear, seek only peace in your fear, seek only love -d. bowie -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel |
Broken dependency for RHEL6
2010/12/20 Paulo Cavalcanti <promac@gmail.com>:
> > > On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@scrye.com> wrote: >> >> On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 12:31:16 -0200 >> Paulo Cavalcanti <promac@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > That is the problem. python-lirc has never been built for RHEL. >> > >> > I know it works because I built it myself on rhel5 a long time ago, >> > and I run it there just fine. >> > >> > I will do the request as you suggested. >> >> You may also wish to request co-maintainer status in pkgdb if you would >> like to help maintain this package. It looks like it's owned by thias. >> > > > Well, I changed the code for not requiring python-lirc and updated rawhide > successfully. Can you revert that, rawhide has python-lirc so it doesn't help to remove it there. > But it seems I can not build for RHEL6* (but rhel6 is listed on packagedb > for fmtools ...) You need to request it for EPEL-6, but it's weird that you have been warned about a broken depedency on a branch that you wasn't a commiter yet. Nicolas (kwizart) -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel |
Broken dependency for RHEL6
On Mon, Dec 20, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@gmail.com> wrote:
2010/12/20 Paulo Cavalcanti <promac@gmail.com>: > > > On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 4:02 PM, Kevin Fenzi <kevin@scrye.com> wrote: >> >> On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 12:31:16 -0200 >> Paulo Cavalcanti <promac@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > That is the problem. python-lirc has never been built for RHEL. >> > >> > I know it works because I built it myself on rhel5 a long time ago, >> > and I run it there just fine. >> > >> > I will do the request as you suggested. >> >> You may also wish to request co-maintainer status in pkgdb if you would >> like to help maintain this package. It looks like it's owned by thias. >> > > > Well, I changed the code for not requiring python-lirc and updated rawhide > successfully. Can you revert that, rawhide has python-lirc so it doesn't help to remove it there. It is not necessary. If python-lirc is installed it will be used (it is only not installed by default). I think Requires(hint) should have this function, but in fact it enforces the same way as just an ordinary Requires. * > But it seems I can not build for RHEL6* (but rhel6 is listed on packagedb > for fmtools ...) You need to request it for EPEL-6, but it's weird that you have been warned about a broken depedency on a branch that you wasn't a commiter yet. I think other people in a similar situation are also receiving these warnings. * -- Paulo Roma Cavalcanti LCG - UFRJ -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel |
Broken dependency for RHEL6
Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
> I think Requires(hint) should have this function, but in fact it enforces > the same way as just an ordinary Requires. RPM (at least rpm.org RPM, which we use; I have no idea about what rpm5.org does) doesn't actually support Requires(hint). It just treats this as a regular Requires, and future versions are likely to error entirely when they see it. Kevin Kofler -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel |
Broken dependency for RHEL6
On Mon, 20 Dec 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Paulo Cavalcanti wrote: >> I think Requires(hint) should have this function, but in fact it enforces >> the same way as just an ordinary Requires. > > RPM (at least rpm.org RPM, which we use; I have no idea about what rpm5.org > does) doesn't actually support Requires(hint). It just treats this as a > regular Requires, and future versions are likely to error entirely when they > see it. More precisely, there's an ancient flaw in the spec parser which allows unknown dependency qualifiers to slip through in some situations. Requires(hint) is just as meaningful to rpm as Requires(iwantmypony), literally, and both will report an error in some combinations of and on others (such as when they're the only qualifier) it'll slip through and end up treated as regular requires. And future versions WILL error out on them. - Panu - -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel |
| All times are GMT. The time now is 04:08 AM. |
VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.