OO updates - no presto support?
 

Hello all,

I've noticed that since the release of F14 a fairly large [1] number of
OO updates came down the wire - non of them in deltarpm/presto form
(read: a >100MB download per release).

Is it bug or intended behavior?
If its a bug, wouldn't it be wise to hold off on releasing
non-security-fixes until its resolved?

FWIW, I'm on Fedora 14, x86_64.

- Gilboa
[1]
$ cat /var/log/yum.log | grep openoffice.org-core | grep fc14
Nov 09 11:12:38 Updated: 1:openoffice.org-core-3.3.0-13.3.fc14.x86_64
Nov 21 13:35:30 Updated: 1:openoffice.org-core-3.3.0-14.1.fc14.x86_64
Nov 24 09:18:57 Updated: 1:openoffice.org-core-3.3.0-15.2.fc14.x86_64
Dec 04 14:02:43 Updated: 1:openoffice.org-core-3.3.0-17.2.fc14.x86_64


--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

OO updates - no presto support?
 

On 12/04/2010 06:54 PM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> I've noticed that since the release of F14 a fairly large [1] number of
> OO updates came down the wire - non of them in deltarpm/presto form
> (read: a >100MB download per release).
>
> Is it bug or intended behavior?
> If its a bug, wouldn't it be wise to hold off on releasing
> non-security-fixes until its resolved?
>
> FWIW, I'm on Fedora 14, x86_64.

It is a bug. Refer to

http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-November/387625.html

Rahul


--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

OO updates - no presto support?
 

On Sat, 2010-12-04 at 19:00 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 12/04/2010 06:54 PM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> > Hello all,
> >
> > I've noticed that since the release of F14 a fairly large [1] number of
> > OO updates came down the wire - non of them in deltarpm/presto form
> > (read: a >100MB download per release).
> >
> > Is it bug or intended behavior?
> > If its a bug, wouldn't it be wise to hold off on releasing
> > non-security-fixes until its resolved?
> >
> > FWIW, I'm on Fedora 14, x86_64.
>
> It is a bug. Refer to
>
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2010-November/387625.html
>
> Rahul
>

Thanks.
The ML post quite thin on details, any idea if this has been reported on
bugzilla?

- Gilboa

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel