FAQ Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.


» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

Go Back   Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Development

 
 
LinkBack Thread Tools
 
Old 11-27-2010, 07:04 AM
Jens Petersen
 
Default headsup: ghc 7 lands in rawhide

Hi,

I have just moved ghc-7.0.1 and a large set
of Haskell ghc package rebuilds into dist-f15
(from dist-f15-ghc).

The main stacks have been rebuilt: darcs,
haskell-platform, xmonad, and gtk2hs.

Rebuilds still pending include xmobar, hlint,
and various libraries (currently with one or less dependents).
Any rawhide package that depends on a Haskell library
and hasn't already been rebuilt, must be rebuilt with ghc-7.0.1.

You can read more about ghc-7.0.1's new features in the release-notes:
http://new-www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/7.0.1/html/users_guide/release-7-0-1.html

This work is part of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/GHC70

If you need help with rebuilding a package with ghc-7.0.1
please contact me, #fedora-haskell or haskell-devel list.

Testing and feedback of the new packages in rawhide is most welcome
in bugzilla or mailing-list.

Thanks, Jens
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 11-27-2010, 03:39 PM
Bruno Wolff III
 
Default headsup: ghc 7 lands in rawhide

On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 03:04:30 -0500,
Jens Petersen <petersen@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> If you need help with rebuilding a package with ghc-7.0.1
> please contact me, #fedora-haskell or haskell-devel list.

I need ghc-hslogger rebuilt in order to rebuild hedgewars.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 11-27-2010, 05:12 PM
"Bryan O'Sullivan"
 
Default headsup: ghc 7 lands in rawhide

On Sat, Nov 27, 2010 at 12:04 AM, Jens Petersen <petersen@redhat.com> wrote:

I have just moved ghc-7.0.1 and a large set

of Haskell ghc package rebuilds into dist-f15

(from dist-f15-ghc).

Thanks for doing this work, Jens!*

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 11-28-2010, 05:24 PM
John Reiser
 
Default headsup: ghc 7 lands in rawhide

On 11/27/2010 12:04 AM, Jens Petersen wrote:
> I have just moved ghc-7.0.1 and a large set
> of Haskell ghc package rebuilds into dist-f15
> (from dist-f15-ghc).

> Rebuilds still pending include xmobar, hlint,
> and various libraries (currently with one or less dependents).

> Testing and feedback of the new packages in rawhide is most welcome
> in bugzilla or mailing-list.

How can this testing take place when a very long list of dependencies
has not yet appeared in rawhide? A sample (6 of *hundreds*):

ghc-csv-devel-0.1.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires ghc = 0:6.12.3
ghc-csv-devel-0.1.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires ghc-doc = 0:6.12.3
ghc-csv-prof-0.1.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires ghc-prof = 0:6.12.3
ghc-haskell-src-exts-1.9.0-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libHShaskell98-1.0.1.1-ghc6.12.3.so()(64bit)
ghc-haskell-src-exts-1.9.0-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libHSrandom-1.0.0.2-ghc6.12.3.so()(64bit)
ghc-haskell-src-exts-1.9.0-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libHSfilepath-1.1.0.4-ghc6.12.3.so()(64bit)

Please explain why such changes are not done in dependency order
(bottom up). Other collections of packages have made similar messes
from time to time. I don't understand the reasoning for top-down
dribbling, particularly when the same subset of packagers is responsible
for the entire suite.

--
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 11-28-2010, 05:41 PM
Adam Williamson
 
Default headsup: ghc 7 lands in rawhide

On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 10:24 -0800, John Reiser wrote:
> On 11/27/2010 12:04 AM, Jens Petersen wrote:
> > I have just moved ghc-7.0.1 and a large set
> > of Haskell ghc package rebuilds into dist-f15
> > (from dist-f15-ghc).
>
> > Rebuilds still pending include xmobar, hlint,
> > and various libraries (currently with one or less dependents).
>
> > Testing and feedback of the new packages in rawhide is most welcome
> > in bugzilla or mailing-list.
>
> How can this testing take place when a very long list of dependencies
> has not yet appeared in rawhide? A sample (6 of *hundreds*):
>
> ghc-csv-devel-0.1.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires ghc = 0:6.12.3
> ghc-csv-devel-0.1.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires ghc-doc = 0:6.12.3
> ghc-csv-prof-0.1.2-2.fc15.x86_64 requires ghc-prof = 0:6.12.3
> ghc-haskell-src-exts-1.9.0-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libHShaskell98-1.0.1.1-ghc6.12.3.so()(64bit)
> ghc-haskell-src-exts-1.9.0-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libHSrandom-1.0.0.2-ghc6.12.3.so()(64bit)
> ghc-haskell-src-exts-1.9.0-2.fc14.x86_64 requires libHSfilepath-1.1.0.4-ghc6.12.3.so()(64bit)
>
> Please explain why such changes are not done in dependency order
> (bottom up). Other collections of packages have made similar messes
> from time to time. I don't understand the reasoning for top-down
> dribbling, particularly when the same subset of packagers is responsible
> for the entire suite.

Agreed. I really don't see a reason to break so many packages, even if
it is 'only Rawhide'. Was there a reason all these rebuilds could not be
completed in the tag?
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 11-28-2010, 10:52 PM
Jens Petersen
 
Default headsup: ghc 7 lands in rawhide

----- "Bruno Wolff III" <bruno@wolff.to> wrote:
> I need ghc-hslogger rebuilt in order to rebuild hedgewars.

It is in dist-f15-build now, so you can go ahead.

Thanks, Jens
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 11-29-2010, 01:39 AM
Jens Petersen
 
Default headsup: ghc 7 lands in rawhide

----- "John Reiser" <jreiser@bitwagon.com> wrote:
> How can this testing take place when a very long list of dependencies
> has not yet appeared in rawhide?

Well I meant after the rebuilds were completed, but
the majority of the packages had already been rebuilt
at the time of writing. Which one was interrupting
you testing?

> A sample (6 of *hundreds*):

Mathstuf, Lakshmi, and I have now rebuilt
nearly all (15) of the remaining packages.

The only remaining pending rebuilds I am aware
of now are xmobar and hedgewars (which Bruno is working on).

> I don't understand the reasoning for top-down
> dribbling, particularly when the same subset of packagers is
> responsible for the entire suite.

Not sure what you are talking about.
Obviously it is impossible to rebuild top-down.

Anyway sorry for the rawhide report noise,
hope it didn't spoil your weekend too much.

Jens
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 11-29-2010, 01:43 AM
Jens Petersen
 
Default headsup: ghc 7 lands in rawhide

----- "Adam Williamson" <awilliam@redhat.com> wrote:
> Agreed. I really don't see a reason to break so many packages, even
> if it is 'only Rawhide'. Was there a reason all these rebuilds could not
> be completed in the tag?

Well mostly me being a slacker (I only rebuilt 50+ packages)
and hoping to engage some of the rest of the Haskell SIG
to help with the rebuilds. But I will try to coordinate
better next time and make sure all packages get rebuild
in the -ghc tag to avoid any broken deps.

Thanks, Jens
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 11-29-2010, 02:34 AM
Jens Petersen
 
Default headsup: ghc 7 lands in rawhide

> The only remaining pending rebuilds I am aware
> of now are xmobar and hedgewars (which Bruno is working on).

Ok, I missed one more: ghc-feldspar-language,
which like xmobar also seems to need a little work for ghc7.

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 
Old 11-29-2010, 03:55 PM
Adam Williamson
 
Default headsup: ghc 7 lands in rawhide

On Sun, 2010-11-28 at 21:43 -0500, Jens Petersen wrote:
> ----- "Adam Williamson" <awilliam@redhat.com> wrote:
> > Agreed. I really don't see a reason to break so many packages, even
> > if it is 'only Rawhide'. Was there a reason all these rebuilds could not
> > be completed in the tag?
>
> Well mostly me being a slacker (I only rebuilt 50+ packages)

If you set off a process which requires a ton of work to be done, and
you only do 500kg of work, then you're still creating a problem, even
though you did a lot of work.

> and hoping to engage some of the rest of the Haskell SIG
> to help with the rebuilds. But I will try to coordinate
> better next time and make sure all packages get rebuild
> in the -ghc tag to avoid any broken deps.

thanks, that'd be great.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
 

Thread Tools




All times are GMT. The time now is 05:09 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.
Copyright 2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org