On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 05:20:02PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Should gpg 1.x be installed as /usr/bin/gpg1, gpg 2.x be installed as
> /usr/bin/gpg2 (as is already the case), and /usr/bin/gpg replaced
> with a symlink managed by alternatives?
If you check the list archives, this has come up before and the answer was
no. gpg1 and gpg2 are intended to provide separate functionality.
devel mailing list