Should gpg use alternatives? - Linux Archive

Mark Forums Read

» Video Reviews

» Linux Archive

Linux-archive is a website aiming to archive linux email lists and to make them easily accessible for linux users/developers.

» Sponsor

» Partners

» Sponsor

		Linux Archive > Redhat > Fedora Development
Should gpg use alternatives?

Old

11-06-2010, 08:20 PM

Sam Varshavchik

Default

Should gpg use alternatives?

Should gpg 1.x be installed as /usr/bin/gpg1, gpg 2.x be installed as
/usr/bin/gpg2 (as is already the case), and /usr/bin/gpg replaced with a
symlink managed by alternatives?

--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page

All times are GMT. The time now is 06:50 PM.

VBulletin, Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO ©2007, Crawlability, Inc.

Copyright ©2007 - 2008, www.linux-archive.org