1000 Bug reports
 

I apologize for this little bit of hubris. I recently filed my 1000th bug
report at bugzilla.redhat.com (unfortunately closed NOTABUG). I thought I'd
take a look at my statistics.

First bug filed 2002-12-07 (RHL 8.0)
Avg rate of bugs - 1 / 2.85 days
Most bugs filed in a day: 7
7 2008-03-18
7 2009-03-17
(Hmm, what is it about the ides of March! (probably testing new releases))
Top months:
29 2009-03
33 2008-03
By year:
1 2002
5 2003
18 2004
123 2005
198 2006
145 2007
197 2008
192 2009
121 2010 (a little slow to hit my ~200/year pace)

Top components:
19 autofs (we automount home and data dirs)
21 NetworkManager
32 selinux-policy-targeted
73 Package Review
91 selinux-policy ( I like quiet logwatch reports! )
104 kernel
112 anaconda (I do a lot of automated installs)

6 palindrome bugs:
523325
528825
587785
523325
528825
587785

Open:
24 ASSIGNED
4 MODIFIED
73 NEW
4 ON_QA

Resolved:
"valid":
10 CLOSED CANTFIX
134 CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
2 CLOSED DEFERRED
75 CLOSED ERRATA
125 CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
265 CLOSED RAWHIDE
19 CLOSED UPSTREAM

"invalid":
70 CLOSED DUPLICATE
8 CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA
99 CLOSED NOTABUG
70 CLOSED WONTFIX
18 CLOSED WORKSFORME

So 26.5% (so far) of my reports are no so useful. I shall have to try harder!

Here's to the next 1000!

--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion@cora.nwra.com
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

1000 Bug reports
 

Greetings,

This is great data, thanks for sharing Orion! I've cc'd the test@ list
as well since I think this is of value there.

On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 11:10 -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I apologize for this little bit of hubris. I recently filed my 1000th bug
> report at bugzilla.redhat.com (unfortunately closed NOTABUG). I thought I'd
> take a look at my statistics.
>
> First bug filed 2002-12-07 (RHL 8.0)
> Avg rate of bugs - 1 / 2.85 days
> Most bugs filed in a day: 7
> 7 2008-03-18
> 7 2009-03-17
> (Hmm, what is it about the ides of March! (probably testing new releases))
> Top months:
> 29 2009-03
> 33 2008-03
> By year:
> 1 2002
> 5 2003
> 18 2004
> 123 2005
> 198 2006
> 145 2007
> 197 2008
> 192 2009

I'm wondering if this was related to the anaconda storage re-write?
That doesn't explain the similar numbers from previous years, but it
would be interesting+difficult to map these trends to releases/features.

> 121 2010 (a little slow to hit my ~200/year pace)
>
> Top components:
> 19 autofs (we automount home and data dirs)
> 21 NetworkManager
> 32 selinux-policy-targeted
> 73 Package Review
> 91 selinux-policy ( I like quiet logwatch reports! )
> 104 kernel
> 112 anaconda (I do a lot of automated installs)

I've said this to you before, but I'll say it again ... thank you for
your contributions to Fedora installation validation.

> 6 palindrome bugs:
> 523325
> 528825
> 587785
> 523325
> 528825
> 587785

Heh, cute statistic. It's a shame there are no door prizes for the
number of palindrome bugs. Otherwise, you would win them. :P

> Open:
> 24 ASSIGNED
> 4 MODIFIED
> 73 NEW
> 4 ON_QA
>
> Resolved:
> "valid":
> 10 CLOSED CANTFIX
> 134 CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
> 2 CLOSED DEFERRED
> 75 CLOSED ERRATA
> 125 CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
> 265 CLOSED RAWHIDE
> 19 CLOSED UPSTREAM
>
> "invalid":
> 70 CLOSED DUPLICATE
> 8 CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA
> 99 CLOSED NOTABUG
> 70 CLOSED WONTFIX
> 18 CLOSED WORKSFORME
>
> So 26.5% (so far) of my reports are no so useful. I shall have to try harder!

I don't think I'd call them 'not useful'. I subscribe to having more
data, than no data. Of course, as a maintainer I've never had to
DUPLICATE a large number of bugs. Your duplicate numbers above, while
yes they add time spent triaging and duplicating related issues, they
also impress upon the prevalence of the problem.

> Here's to the next 1000!

Congrats and cheers! :)

Thanks,
James
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

1000 Bug reports
 

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 09/29/2010 01:10 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I apologize for this little bit of hubris. I recently filed my 1000th bug
> report at bugzilla.redhat.com (unfortunately closed NOTABUG). I thought I'd
> take a look at my statistics.
>
> First bug filed 2002-12-07 (RHL 8.0)
> Avg rate of bugs - 1 / 2.85 days
> Most bugs filed in a day: 7
> 7 2008-03-18
> 7 2009-03-17
> (Hmm, what is it about the ides of March! (probably testing new releases))
> Top months:
> 29 2009-03
> 33 2008-03
> By year:
> 1 2002
> 5 2003
> 18 2004
> 123 2005
> 198 2006
> 145 2007
> 197 2008
> 192 2009
> 121 2010 (a little slow to hit my ~200/year pace)
>
> Top components:
> 19 autofs (we automount home and data dirs)
> 21 NetworkManager
> 32 selinux-policy-targeted
> 73 Package Review
> 91 selinux-policy ( I like quiet logwatch reports! )
> 104 kernel
> 112 anaconda (I do a lot of automated installs)
>
> 6 palindrome bugs:
> 523325
> 528825
> 587785
> 523325
> 528825
> 587785
>
> Open:
> 24 ASSIGNED
> 4 MODIFIED
> 73 NEW
> 4 ON_QA
>
> Resolved:
> "valid":
> 10 CLOSED CANTFIX
> 134 CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE
> 2 CLOSED DEFERRED
> 75 CLOSED ERRATA
> 125 CLOSED NEXTRELEASE
> 265 CLOSED RAWHIDE
> 19 CLOSED UPSTREAM
>
> "invalid":
> 70 CLOSED DUPLICATE
> 8 CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA
> 99 CLOSED NOTABUG
> 70 CLOSED WONTFIX
> 18 CLOSED WORKSFORME
>
> So 26.5% (so far) of my reports are no so useful. I shall have to try harder!
>
> Here's to the next 1000!
>
You have greatly helped out with SELinux testing. Thanks a lot.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkyjp54ACgkQrlYvE4MpobNIsgCfdq/4JzzeHtVmizV4qJzHVLpO
aQ8AniT0bnzOKLsysKMM7AvZsU8BjQQW
=mg06
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel